The U.S. arms embargo of the Spanish Civil War, and FDR’s Illegal, bumbling attempt to send covert military aid to Spanish Reds in 1938.
🧵1 /17
As Spain was engulfed by civil war, both the American people and FDR’s State Department were firmly opposed to any U.S. intervention in the conflict. Secretary of State Cordell Hull was a strong advocate for an arms embargo. 2/17
FDR’s Ambassadors in Europe were suspicious the radicalism of Spain’s Loyalists, and their ties to the USSR. Many in the State Department believed that a victory by the Loyalists would be a victory for the Bolsheviks in Europe. 3/17
The American people were even more opposed than the State Department to any foreign intervention. The Nye Committee hearings had convinced many Americans that intervention in WW I had been “driven by bankers and munitions traders with business interests in Europe." 4/17
With strong public support, Congress passed a series of Neutrality Acts in the 1930s. The Spanish Arms Embargo bill passed unanimously in the Senate and by 411 votes to 1 in the House.
5/17
But the Spanish Reds were not without comrades in high places. In particular, Treasury Secretary Harold Morgenthau would come to oppose the embargo.
6/17
With FDR’s support, Morgenthau had moved to circumvent the Neutrality Act and FDR’s own State Department by purchasing Spanish silver from cash-strapped the Loyalists, despite General Francisco Franco’s claims that the Communists had stolen the silver from the Bank of Spain.
7/17
While U.S. Leftists strongly favored the Spanish Reds, American Catholics tended to be more sympathetic toward Franco and the Nationalists. Catholic opposition to the Loyalist had been driven by the Red Terror – the mass-killing of Catholic clerics and burning of churches.
8/17
As the war dragged on FDR increasingly feared that a Nationalist victory would undermine the Western Democracies. By 1938, FDR “clearly favored the Loyalists” and was searching for politically feasible ways a lifting the embargo.
9/17
Catholic anti-Communism seemed to insurmountable obstacle blocking FDR's desire to support the Spanish Reds. FDR feared an intense backlash in the 1938 elections if he pressed ahead with repeal of the embargo.
10/17
Faced with opposition from the American people, the Congress, and his own State Department, FDR nonetheless resolved to break U.S. law and send illegal covert military aid to the Spanish Reds. There seemed to be an opportunity as France had reopened its border with Spain.
11/17
Under the embargo act, “transshipment” was expressly illegal – meaning an arms dealer could not ship military aircraft to France, for the purpose of sending them on the Spain. Nevertheless, this is precisely what FDR proposed to do.
12/17
In May of 1938, an agent for Loyalist Spain began making arrangements for a large purchase of military aircraft. He seemed confident that he could evade the U.S. embargo. Aircraft industry informants immediately informed the State Department of the suspicions scheme.
13/17
In France, U.S. Ambassador Bullitt was stunned when the Spanish Ambassador to France informed him that FDR had personally had approved the illegal arms deal. Bullet sent a discreet warning to FDR and the State Department.
14/17
Bullitt soon received another shock, when he was contacted by FDR’s brother-in-law (Elenore’s brother Hall). Bullitt was informed that about 150 aircraft were ready to ship to Spain. Once again, Bullitt was assured that FDR has personally approved the illegal arms shipment.
15/17
Bullitt thew cold water on the scheme - informing Hall that France had again closed the frontier to arms shipments. Bullitt then sent another discreet, but stern warning to FDR, stating that he ‘‘could not imagine a moment more unpropitious’’ to organize covert arms sales. 16/17
With the frontier closed, and the State Department alert and opposed the embargo violation, FDR’s scheme to break U.S. law to help the Reds collapsed.
Main source:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Bombing Germany – From Douhet to Dresden: How British and American air forces came to employ a strategy of massacring civilians.
> Instead of engaging enemy forces, peak American technology and some of its best, bravest men were put to work killing women and children.
🧵/23
"Jus in Bello" traditions had endured for nearly two hundred years in the West. But after WW I, the new theories of air warfare and the new technology of the heavy four-engine bomber set the stage for the indiscriminate destruction of cities and the mass-killing of civilians.
/2
Pre-WW II air-power theorists like Douhet had argued that terror-bombing of civilians would actually *shorten* a war and save lives. Although bombing of military targets continued throughout the war, proponents of terror bombing were allowed to put their theory into practice.
/3
In 1974, in the second month of the disastrous court-ordered integration in Boston, violence spread and the crisis escalated, with national implications. President Ford weighed-in, and the 82nd Airborne Division at Fort Brag was put on standby alert.
🧵
In September of 1974, the often violent resistance in South Boston had grabbed national attention. Hopes that the turmoil could be contained to one neighborhood were soon shattered. In early October, Blacks rioted in neighborhoods across the city. 2/
On October 8, following news of a beating of a Haitian immigrant in South Boston, turmoil broke out at English High school. Blacks rioted and battled police around Mission Hill. "Some 1,500 black students began walking up Tremont Street "smashing windows and hurling rocks." 3/
> 1960: America seems to be entering an era of hope and prosperity.
> End of the 1960s: Complete break-down of law and order. Half the country afraid to go out at night. A crime wave of "epic proportions."
From 1960 to 1970, rates of violent crime (essentially, murder, rape, robbery, and serious assaults) in the U.S. more than doubled, from 161 per 100,000 to 364. Murder rates rose 55 percent, while robbery rates climbed over 91 percent. And it continued to rise into the 1990s.
There was some evidence of rising crime in other western countries. But crime was *falling* in Japan. And Korea, Hong Kong, and Singapore did not see a significant crime increase.
Catholic Irish v. Italian culture clash in 1890s Boston:
"In the old country, regular church attendance was expected only of females; Italian men in Boston
discovered that no Catholic was exempt from this obligation."
"The Irish priest, whose devotions centered around the all-male Holy Trinity, encountered the matriarchal Italian family, which focused on the Madonna and Child."
"No Irishman, for instance, would enter a church wearing a hat and puffing on a cigar; nor would he profess his human frailties prostrating himself before a crucifix or Station of the Cross."
FDR and the "Back Road" to War with Japan:
After WW I, with the Lansing–Ishii Agreement, the U.S. had acknowledged that Japan has legitimate security interests in Manchuria – the Bolsheviks were on the march, the spread of communism threatened China and Korea.
🧵/18
Lennin had shrewdly granted concessions to U.S. businesses in Manchuria, sowing the seeds for conflict – “In this way we incite American Imperialism against the Japanese bourgeoisie.”
2/18
By the 1930s, Japan had seized control of Manchuria. But it was clear that that the Soviets were hard at work laying the foundation for Communist revolution in the Far East.
3/18
Thread on Pat Buchanan’s “Where the Right Went Wrong.”
> Not one of his best books, but the discussion on Neocons is relevant as President Trump begins staffing his new administration:
🧵/12
Buchanan had been staunch conservative, and a loyal lieutenant in both the Nixon and Reagan administrations. In his view, the Bush-era ascendency of the Neocons was a dramatic and disastrous break from American conservative tradition. The Neocons had their own agenda.
2/12
Early Neocons like Irving Kristol were ex-Trotskyites. They admired FDR and LBJ. They were liberal internationalists - traditional foes of the America First movement. They later moved to the Republican party, believing it would be a useful tool to accomplish their agenda.
3/12