Lots of responses to this post I made the other day laying out the case for why trans activism is homophobic, most of them supportive. For the few that weren't, here's a thread where I brought the receipts. If my earlier post was opening arguments,consider this the full case: 🧵
First up, the charities, such as Stonewall and GLAAD. These are the groups that were originally set up as gay rights advocates, but were retooled around 2015 into trans rights advocates, and - since trans activism seeks to erase homosexuality - promptly began to do exactly that
With the anti-gay activists now in charge and setting the tone, media now takes the reins and begins subtly erasing the very notion of same-sex attraction, suggesting that lesbians who don't want to date ppl with penises, and gay men not interested in vaginas are hateful bigots
And more of the same nonsense:
With the activists dictating, and the media following their lead,the homophobia inevitably trickles down. This manifests in different forms, but one of them is the psychological torture of homosexuals,some of whom have come to believe their innate orientation means they're bigots
But mostly the biggest effect is in the trans community itself, who have increasingly internalized the idea that same-sex attraction doesn't exist, and thus, any ppl who claim to be exclusively same-sex attracted are actually just transphobic bigots who can be abused at will
The rest is just gonna be a firehose of hate, as I try to dispel the idea that this homophobia is "just a few bad apples" instead of the truth: it's a core component underpinning the entire ideology transgenderism, as are the violent threats that often accompany it:
I could go on and on, but I think the point here is made.Homophobia doesn't just exist in the trans community, it's RIFE in it. It's a feature, not a bug, the erasure of sex (and by extension, homosexuals) is a core goal of trans activism. Hopefully this has opened some eyes /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One of the ways the genderatti have managed to be so successful in backdooring their hateful, misogynistic ideology is by using euphemistic language that often means the opposite of what is described ("trans women" to describe a type of man, for example).
In this 🧵, I'm going to repost many of the "trans voices" from JK's link below, only this time using accurate language for the things actually being described ("TERF" will become 'woman/female', "trans woman" will become 'man' etc).
Even for those of us well aware of the violent misogyny at the core of transgenderism, it still comes as a shock when you see it described accurately like that, and makes it even more baffling at how we allowed this malignant cancer to spread so far and so wide before we woke up to how dangerous it is.
Now that this report is finally starting to get some traction after a slow start last night, let's take a deep dive into some of these shocking examples of "care" that these butchers are describing.
It's literally proving everything we've been saying about the dangers of transitioning children, showing clearly we were right about what we've been screaming from the mountains, that these fucking idiots don't have any goddamn clue what they're doing. This is all one giant experiment with them, and they're doing it on profoundly vulnerable kids.
Reading between the lines, and granting that these ppl MIGHT have a shred of humanity in them, you can clearly see the doubt they're having about what they're doing to these kids, constantly needing reassurance from their Mengelian colleagues. Clearly everything they know about medicine and care is telling them this is wrong.
I'll paraphrase some of these in the usual snarky way, but this is deadly serious. For ease of understanding, I'll do away with their Orwellian double speak and nonsense pronoun usage and just refer to the patients they're talking about using correct pronouns.
This shit is bad.
"This boy has been transitioning since he was 4. He's now 14 and wants to have his healthy penis cut off. I don't want to sound like a transphobe but I admit I'm a little apprehensive because I've never castrated anyone so young before. Recommendations?"
Yes. Don't do it ffs.
"I've got a female 10 y/o patient who believes she's a male. Will blocking her puberty stunt her growth?"
Yes, you fucking idiot, of course it will. You don't need a medical degree to know that blocking the biggest period of growth in human development will stunt her growth.
As expected, the detransitioners are finally showing up in numbers, and they're going to be the knockout blow for gender ideology.
As more and more of them come out of the woodwork, they'll deliver a devastating 1-2 punch which this toxic cult won't recover from: on the one… https://t.co/ecTJKSNnTptwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Gonna take a deep dive into the specifics of this case from the article itself, cause holy shit, this is literally an itemized list of everything that GC ppl have been warning about.
Up first, we have the "It's a social contagion you idiots, and teenage girls are uniquely… https://t.co/1ysLfVukhktwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Up next, we have the ever popular "Kids and their parents cannot consent to these procedures because they simply are not being informed of the risks they're taking" argument.
Ms Aldaco was "not warned that [testosterone in females] could cause infertility, vaginal atrophy, loss… https://t.co/i4JUYPHpkutwitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Dunno who needs to hear this, but the idea that a "sexed soul" exists, which cannot be measured or identified in any empirical way outside of a person's "deeply held conviction" is a faith-based religious belief.
"Trans women are women!" is a textbook gnostic statement of faith
And like we've been telling the religious right for years, everyone is entitled to their own religious beliefs. But they ARE NOT entitled to force their religion on the rest of us, demand we swear fealty to their religious dogma, or use their religion to inform public policy/law
The idea that it's even POSSIBLE to be "born in the wrong body" is an extremist religious belief that teaches kids to hate themselves & their bodies.
And just like religious extremists throughout history,they are attempting to use the levers of state power to enforce their will
And with that, the erasure of women is complete. Women are now only allowed to define themselves relative to men. You are either a 'man', or a 'non-man'
Tuesdays words of the day wasn't much better. "Gay" is NOT "someone attracted to the same gender".
'gender' is a social construct, with ambiguous meaning, sexual preference is innate. Humans cannot innately be attracted to an abstract social construct.
"Some transgender ppl may change their appearance through clothing and surgery, but they do not need to change their appearance to validate their gender"
Translation: "the bearded man with the erection showering with the women and girls in their change room is just as… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Gender ideology is like an onion with multiple layers, and once you actually dig into it, and get past the "be kind" and "inclusivity!" And "diversity!" layers, you always end up at the same three layers at it's core:
Apropos of nothing (other than as a sign of how deeply this insanity has gripped all aspects of "respectable" society) Andrea Long Chu - he of the deeply misogynistic quote that the "asshole is the universal way to access femaleness" - just won the Pulitzer Prize a few weeks ago… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…