Richard Jean So Profile picture
Jun 19 10 tweets 3 min read Read on X
I wrote about the publishing industry's post #BLM diversity push - the largest transformation of its kind in US history - and their current attempts to dismantle it, for quite dubious reasons w/ @dan_sinykin at @TheAtlantic. A thread to summarize the article's main arguments >>>
US fiction publishing 1950-2018 was 95% white authors. We did some research and found - quite astonishingly - that number drops to 75% white authors within only 4 years post BLM. This is the largest race-based transformation of the book industry in history. It is unprecedented. Image
The bad news: over the past year, based on a series of firings of prominent Black/POC editors, it's clear that publishers want to end this trend. In terms of promoting fairness & equity, they have done something historically unprecedented & profound and decided it's not for them.
Why? The facile and oft-cited argument is that book sales of Black and POC authors have not sold as well as hoped. Defenders of this argument will say "publishing isn't a charity, it's a business." Here is why this argument is fallacious and is in fact bad business practice >>>
Publishers have not done the adequate market research & audience outreach to help these books succeed. They have set them up to fail. Check out this quote from Regina Brooks. If you don't thoughtfully promote your books and try to reach an audience, you will not sell books. Image
More so, fiction publishing still largely imagines its main & target audience as white women age 35-60. That's just a small part of the overall reading market & audience, however. Imagine if Netflix only made shows for white women 35-60. Not a great business model! Image
The most infuriating part of all this is this is a never-ending cycle: it happened in the 1980s, again in the early 2000s, and now again in 2020-2023. Every time publishers fail and try again in 20 years. Our suggestion: figure it out this time, rather than wait again to fail.
Thanks to @galbeckerman & the amazing editorial team at @TheAtlantic for giving us this opportunity + doing an amazing job with this piece. Thank you for giving us the chance to tell what we think is an important story.
@galbeckerman @TheAtlantic And thanks to my old friend and long time collaborator, @dan_sinykin for inviting me into this project. It's been a highlight of my career working on this material with you for the past decade, and it shows that good research can emerge from deep friendships.
@galbeckerman @TheAtlantic @dan_sinykin I forgot the link to the actual article!!!! Sorry!!!! theatlantic.com/books/archive/…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Richard Jean So

Richard Jean So Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @RichardJeanSo

Jun 26, 2021
I've been seeing the following a lot: "I'm OK with science but until I see digital research that teaches me SOMETHING NEW abt the novel, poetics etc I won't be interested in DH." Thing is there's a lot of work already out there that does that. Here's a thread w/ a lot of examples
Before I get going, just want to say: it's not like this work is obscure! Special issue of PMLA; special forum of @CriticalInquiry, monographs f/ @ColumbiaUP & @UChicagoPress. It's been at the center of the discipline! If you haven't noticed, perhaps you haven't been rly looking.
New interpretation of the contemporary English language novel and gender inequality/hierarchy from @helaeve and @_akpiper. Identifies hitherto unnoticed/unaccounted patterns of gender relations and dynamics in the novel. culturalanalytics.org/article/11055-…
Read 16 tweets
Dec 11, 2020
Hi friends, w/ Gus Wezerek, I wrote an op-ed for @nytimes on racial inequality and publishing, based on data and interviews. It builds on research in my forthcoming book, REDLINING CULTURE(Columbia UP). Here's a v short thread to underscore some of our key points --->
History says that periodically big publishers attempt to diversify by hiring POC editors but history also says, such efforts are often short lived, and they revert to a state of inequality within years. The current moment faces this same danger, if we don't have structural change
Looking at publishing in a long historical duree, 1950-present, it shows that whiteness is super intractable - like income inequality, the more it accumulates, the harder it is to reverse. We now have decades of accumulated whiteness in publishing. It will take decades to undo.
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(