💥 In a letter to me late last week, the MoD has finally admitted that UK Special Forces were able to veto their Afghan counterparts coming by to the UK, where they could be called as witnesses in an inquiry into allegations of war crimes. This is an absolute scandal that the government spent months denying. thetimes.com/article/b9522b…
Last week, Minister Andrew Murrison sent me this letter. The bizarre part? The letter wasn’t sent to my parliamentary email - which is still receiving correspondence - but to the SNP’s generic HQ email. Clearly they hoped this would be missed entirely and go under the radar.
The veto power outlined in the letter represents a clear conflict of interest for UK Special Forces, as it gave them decision-making power over applications at a time when a public inquiry about alleged war crimes committed by UK Special Forces is underway.
The public inquiry, led by The Right Honourable Lord Justice-Cave, has the power to compel witnesses who are in the UK, but not non-UK nationals who are overseas. If the Afghan Special Forces members were in the UK they could be asked to provide potentially significant evidence.
This represents a 180º reversal of the public position advanced by the UK Government and comes after years of campaigning on the issue of Special Forces oversight - which I raised immediately on the floor of the House of Commons after the 2019 election.
This is an extraordinary admission by the UK Government, and a complete and utter betrayal of those Afghan men who fought alongside UK personnel and now face being hunted and executed by the Taliban.
That the letter has been sneaked out in the most underhand fashion - clearly in the hope that it would go under the radar during an election campaign - is unprecedented. I intend to share the letter with Lord Justice Haddon-Cave as it is clearly pertinent to his inquiry.
Throughout this Parliament, I have consistently campaigned for the UK Government to follow our European and NATO allies in allowing elected politicians to scrutinise the work of the Special Forces. I have consistently been met with stonewalling and lies."
From documents released during the Afghanistan inquiry which reveal that government Ministers knowingly gave false answers to my questions in the House of Commons to this latest attempt to cover their tracks during an election campaign, is it clear that the UK Government will defy the basic principles of honest government even to the bitter end.
For too long, the Westminster parties have agreed an omerta on the Special Forces. I will continue to stand up against this anti-democratic conspiracy of silence, which does nothing but undermine the long-term capability and safety of the Armed Forces and further damage this country's reputation abroad.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Over 300 residents would be forced down these stairs - no possessions, medicines or food - and not see daylight for 27 days. The youngest was just over one month old. The oldest was 93. Seven would be executed by soldiers. Ten would die due to the conditions in the basement.
This is the ‘big room’ of the basement. People were held here against their will without light, food, medicine or toilet facilities for 27 days. Russian soldiers refused to let people out. They would sometimes give tiny portions of food. People weren’t allowed to bring belongings
Over 60 children were held here - some of them babies. Their parents were unable to change them or feed them properly. On one occasion a Russian soldier came in drunk and handed a young child a live grenade purely for fun. Today I met a woman who was here with her 1yo grandchild.
Over the past couple of weeks I have been dealing with a sophisticated and targeted spear phishing hack of my personal email account, and the personal email account belonging to one of my staff. These hacks are a criminal offence. bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politi…
Although attempts to hack my parliamentary account are continuous - as is the case for all MPs - these have not been successful. I want to assure constituents that their information is secure. My private account is not used for constituency or parliamentary business.
Having spoken with officials from parliament's security team and also NCSC, I am confident that my inboxes are now secure. The private email account that was criminally hacked is now no longer actively used by me.
As ever, @AMSalamone is always worth listening to and this article is no different. I don't agree with all of it but I thought I'd chip in some of my own thoughts...
Anthony is right to say that the war will serve as a historical marker. We are approaching 6 weeks since this latest invasion started, and whilst the conflict does probably have some way to go, its implications are profound for every political party in Europe.
Defence and security will take on much more political significance in national debates, and here in Scotland will be no different - irrespective of your political allegiance, view on independence or Brexit, the public will expect us to offer a policy platform reflective of this.
The article rightly highlights the growing aggression and challenge to open societies presented by authoritarian states such as China and Russia. This is something that all liberal societies - not least in the EU - are struggling, and at times failing, to deal with robustly.
So the challenge for Scotland - and indeed the UK now - is to show how we would do so. It’s worth remembering that as we aspire to join multilaterals such as NATO and the EU, so our posture will be in concert with others. But we will still need our own doctrines and strategies.
1/ Okay say a bit of a thread on this. It seems that no matter how often I explain that this concept - which I’d hope to take to SNP conference - is not an equivalent to national service or training people in arms, picture desks still opt for armed marching soldiers.
2/ This pandemic has shown most brutally that traditional approaches security don’t always fit into the modern threat picture - and that our economic and personal security is as relevant to that as our physical security.
3/ During the early part of the pandemic, there was a brief flurry of excitement around the army being mobilised to combat the crisis, which showed how little we talk about the role of the armed forces in delivering human security.
Just four years ago under Cameron the Tory manifesto committed to numbers not falling below 82,000. They’re currently at around 73,000.
This story suggests the army would be cut to around 60-65 thousand - the smallest in centuries.
During the Scottish independence referendum, then defence secretary Philip Hammond promised that the UK Gov would ensure Scotland had 12,500 army personnel based here. They’ve never come close to the target. I guess we can forget it altogether now.