EXCLUSIVE: Jeremy Hunt’s re-election campaign and CCHQ have accepted tens of thousands from a dormant shell company with undisclosed ties to a Mayfair private equity fund
The Tory Treasurer's department initially rejected donations from "Ironduke Management", fearing it broke Electoral Commission rules, then U-turned
Here's the story🧵
Ironduke Management is registered at 10 Piccadilly , but has no physical premises or website or phone number.
The sole director and shareholder is a woman called Jennifer Dowling. It's actually run by her husband, Tom Dowling, who describes himself as a tax consultant
Since its creation in 2018, it has registered itself as a dormant company.
It is currently the subject of a final notice from Companies House to file its accounts.
If it fails to do so, it will be forcibly dissolved in May.
Its last accounts said it had £1 in cash and assets and described the firm’s activity as “financial intermediation”.
I spoke to Tom Dowling. He insists that, in actual fact, Ironduke is not dormant - its next accounts will show it now performs work for another company.
That company?
Ong (One Nation Group) Capital, a private investment fund based in Mayfair specialising in "Levelling Up projects". Its shareholders, he says, are sympathetic to the Tories.
Here's an intriguing detail.
Last year, a subsidiary of Ong - "Ong Residential" - tried to donate £2,100 to CCHQ.
CCHQ rejected the money, saying it was an impermissible donor - i.e. it broke the rules.
Dowling appears to have been behind the attempted donation. He says he is the "CEO designate" of Ong.
But his attempts to donate to CCHQ did not stop there.
He has also made donations via Ironduke. He says Ong Capital's shareholders are aware of this, but did not instigate it.
At first, Jeremy Hunt's association returned Ironduke's cash and CCHQ placed its money under review.
Remember: it is unlawful to take money from a company that does not carry on business in the UK.
Dowling appears to have argued Ironduke - though officially dormant - has technically been active for years.
How?
He told CCHQ it passes HMRC's "Badges of Trade" test - which evolved out of the Income Tax Act 1918. Among other things, this says a company may be conducting business - even if it is doing little - so long as the intention/motivation to make profit in due course.
This was good enough for the Conservative Party, whose director of fundraising, Mike Chattey, gave the green light, telling him it was "great news" the matter had been resolved.
The party has pocketed ~£25k to date - unclear if more to be disclosed in the coming weeks.
The question I have repeatedly asked Dowling is: why not donate personally?
Why instead donate through a dormant shell company on the brink of being forcibly dissolved to which he has no public connection?
Why donate through a firm which receives payments from a separate Tory-linked private equity fund?
Answer there has come none.
He insists however that he has followed the rules, that, though ONG Capital know about the donations, the money is not theirs, and that he is free to give money as he pleases within the law.
A Tory spokesman said: “All donors are checked in line with the Electoral Commission guidelines.
“All reportable donations are properly and transparently declared to the Electoral Commission, published by them, and comply fully with the law."
ENDS
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
EXCLUSIVE: Keir Starmer gave peerage to ex-aide despite knowing he campaigned for man charged with child sex offences inc accessing images of girls as young as 10
No10 investigated + interviewed Matthew Doyle once Morgan McSweeney was warned about him 1/ thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
But after secret inquiry, Downing St concluded that Doyle's "past acquaintance" did not present an impediment to a lifetime appointment to the House of Lords.
Doyle - former No10 director of comms - repeatedly refused to say if contact cut off after conviction of Sean Morton
Morton, a councillor, was charged with offences including possessing/distributing images of naked girls and a couple sexually abusing a dog in November 2016
He was thrown out of Labour but stood for re-election as independent for ward in Moray, Scotland in May 2017
Murdock threatened us to be "very, very careful" when approached with allegations- but would not address claims he used Bounce Back loans to borrow cash when Covid struck.
One firm is J A M Financial, which, after borrowing cash, he transferred to his mum 2/
The other is Gym Live Health and Fitness Limited, which was dormant until the pandemic
Both failed to file accounts - a criminal offence - and were due to be wound up in 2023 when the companies regulator received an intervention from a third party 3/
WORLD EXCLUSIVE 🚨 The leader of Bangladesh says Tulip Siddiq must apologise for using property gifted by "corrupt" regime
He calls for homes to be investigated and returned in cases of "plain robbery" (1/5) thetimes.com/uk/politics/ar…
It comes as we reveal MP lived in Hampstead home bought by offshore firm named in Panama Papers
Pedrok Ventures funded by trust owned by Bangladeshi businessmen
Pedrok gifted it to regime-linked lawyer, who in turn gave it to family of Siddiq, who lived there for years (2/5)
Muhammad Yunus, former Nobel Peace Prize winner and interim leader of Bangladesh, also rebuked Shayan Rahman, billionaire's son who bought Siddiq's mothers home via off-shore trust
In 2021, we revealed the King secretly gave a CBE to a Saudi donor who paid millions in a deal brokered by royal aides
Paying for an honour is a crime
But The Met covered up the scandal, never investigating properly or speaking to the men at its heart—Charles and the Saudi
1/5
Despite Charles repeatedly secretly meeting the Saudi in a years long courtship across three countries, including on official visits, he has never had to answer any questions.
Michael Fawcett, his right hand man, took the blame, leaving as chief executive of his foundation.
2/5
Its chairman quit too and several trustees. But its own internal inquiry was never published and countless questions remain about Charles’s ties to the Saudi and his role in a web of suspicious deals and payments.
3/5