The F-35 has 2 primary data links. They are Link 16 and MADL. I'll go over the general stuff and focus more on MADL here since people are kinda familiar with Link 16. + some extra stuff
Both Link 16 and MADL are 2 major parts of Northrop's ASQ-242 integrated Communication, Navigation, and Identification system (CNI). CNI was designed to give F-35 advanced communication capabilities, and in total, it includes more than 27 functionalities.
Link 16 is the standard datalink for NATO. it operates in the UHF spectrum and uses omni/multi-directional UHF radios to transmit things. Those things can be imageries, tracks of airborne targets, messages, etc. When communicating or sharing things with 4th gen aircraft, AWACS,
or most assets, the F-35 will use Link 16. It's good and reliable but has downsides such as slow speed, uses UHF frequencies (kind of an old technique for data transmission), more susceptible to jamming (compared to MADL), limited output, and higher probability of detection/int
Then there's the F-35's own unique datalink called the MADL
MADL is a low probability of intercept/detection (LPI/D) datalink that operates in Ku-band (12–18GHz IEEE definition) & utilizes more modern communication tech. It was designed for F-35 to communicate with each other
Unlike the omni directional Link 16, MADL shares data in tight, laser like, narrow direction with high bandwidth. This makes MADL much harder to detect/jam while allowing a much higher volume of data to be transferred.
The full capabilities are unknown, but essentially, it does all the main/key things that Link 16 does but more, better, and faster.
A total of 6 MADL antennas can be seen around the aircraft, and together, they provides spherical coverage.
F-35 multiship communication (data sharing/communication between a flight of 4-6 aircraft):
MADL can also be used by the EW suite (Barracuda) to do EW together with other F-35's
MADL was originally designed for F-35 to communicate w each other, but it can also be used to send data to some other assets. Similar to Link 16, MADL can be used to provide detection/track/targeting data to baseline 9 AEGIS equipped warship that have MADL antenna attached.
This allows AEGIS equipped warships to shoot down targets, including the ones at over the horizon using SM-6 while relying on data from the F-35's sensors. This capability has been tested in the past, including once in 2016.
(Target shown below is the Beechcraft MQM-107).
The Army's Intergrated Battle Command System (IBCS) will also have a terminal to communicate with F-35. This has been proven in testing before where data gathered by the F-35 was shared via MADL. Not just any data, but weapons quality track/fire control magnitude of data
I'm sure you've seen articles or headlines saying the F-35 and F-22 can't directly communicate with each other. That's because the F-22 also has its own unique datalink called Intra-Flight Data Link (IFDL). IFDL operates in Q band. The F-22 was supposed to receive MADL, but
mainly because of the cost and the tech being new, it was dropped. So, in order for the F-35 and 22 to communicate w each other using MADL/IFDL, they'd need another aircraft. For example, U-2 with Open Systems Gateway (Project Hydra) or RQ-4 carrying Freedom 550 radio
The F-22 always had a Link 16 receiving terminal, so sharing data to the F-22 wasn't a problem, but receiving from it have been (for any other aircraft that's not an F-22). The F-22 was supposed to receive full Link 16 capability as part of the TAC-Link program, so that'll
allow the Raptor to finally directly communicate with 4th gen, F-35, AWACS, and other assets using Link 16.
Another aircraft that was supposed to receive the MADL is the B-2. Couldn't find anything about whether it received it or not, but there's a good chance it didn't for cost or whatever reason.
MADL also has downsides, major ones being that it's not widely used, nor does other
aircraft besides F-35 and those specialised gateway aircraft use it. And the antennas aren't really cheap.
As part of F-35's Block 4 upgrade (some 88 new/improved capabilities), both Link 16 and MADL will see upgrades.
(This is a few years old and shows 53 of the upgrades)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Belgium and every other existing F-35 operator's delivery was delayed mainly because of difficulties with TR-3 software issues. This is not a Trump or Biden thing.
990 F-35s weren't produced last yr. Around 156 F-35s were built, and closer to half was delivered.
LM delivered 110 aircraft in 5.5 months after deliveries resumed in mid-July, 2024. The plan is to certify & deliver 20 F-35s every month (presumably 13 newly built and 7 from storage). So off the 110, somewhere between 65-75 were newly built, and the rest were from storage.
There are dozens of aircraft that were built in 2023 and 2024, still sitting in storage waiting to be delivered. This year, LM plans to deliver 190 F-35s. So, by 2026, the backlog will be largely gone.
I'm not sure how this is Trump's fault when the Belgian MOD was fully aware
So, from that family, manned NGAD is on hold for now. 1st Increment of CCA is going forward pretty well. The plan was to have 200 manned NGAD and 1,000 CCA, but last year, the SECAF said that the number of CCAs bought could end up being as high as 2,000 on the long run. /1🧵
For CCA Inc 1, Anduril's "Fury" and GA-ASI's offering based on XQ-67A design were chosen. B/w them, a design and the production decision will be made in FY-26. By FY-29, around 100 CCAs are expected to be built. Also, Raytheon is working with the contractors to integrate AMRAAM
with both of the systems.
The USAF is studying how to proceed with CCA Inc 2 and deciding on the requirements and whether to make it more capable and costly than Inc 1 or give up some of the capabilities to make it more affordable. The cost goal of CCA Inc 1 is 1/3 of the
A recap on what happened with the manned component of NGAD in 2024:
- The USAF was supposed to select a contractor sometimes this yr, most likely between Lockheed and Boeing
- In April, USAF requested $2.74 Billion in RDT&E for the FY-25, and planned to spend $19.6 over FY25-29
- The fate of manned NGAD came at a question in June when senior AF officials were talking about no decision being made yet and they'll have to make tough decisions as the budgetary situation gets tighter while having to fund already expensive and cost overruning programs.
- Later the summer, it was announced that they're taking a pause with NGAD and will be doing a review/analysis to see whether they even need the manned NGAD, whether they've everything done right, and whether to pursue it.
- A decision was expected by the end of this year
Lockheed has been awarded a fixed price contract worth $11.7 Billion for Lot 18, which'll cover 145 aircraft. It includes 48 F-35A for USAF, 16 F-35B + 5 F-35C for USMC, 14 F-35C for the USN, 15 F-35A + 1 F-35B aircraft for non DOD partners, 39 F-35A + 7 F-35B for FMS customers.
"Additionally, this modification provides tooling support for the governments of Italy and Japan’s final assembly and check out facilities."
One of the Christmas gifts came early this year.
Worth mentioning that the Flyaway unit cost would go up compared defense.gov/News/Contracts…
to previous production Lots because of inflation and more Block 4 capabilities coming online.
When the DOD awarded contract for procuring long lead materials for Lot 18 aircraft, the # of a/c Lot 18 would cover was stated to be 118, but it turns, it's more than that.
"Our inventory objective for the F-35 is [1,763]. I don't know what we'll end up buying, and nobody can predict that right now. I know we're going to buy more, and we're going to be buying more for some period of time. At some point, this will be dependent on what we do with....
[Next Generation Air Dominance] and what we do with [Collaborative Combat Aircraft], we'll probably revisit that, [but] I don't think we're ready to do that yet,” ~ SecAF Kendall. The 1763 objective number was set around 2005 and the AF would most likely end up buying less.
AF has so far taken delivery of around 450 F-35A's and if they order at a steady pace of 48 year per year, the order for the last aircraft will be placed sometimes in the mid-late 40s and the last aircraft will be retired in 2088, that's IF the current plan stays.
F-35's DAS tracking the 2nd stage burnout of a Falcon 9 during a flight test from 1300+km away. F-35's sensor fusion plays and will play a big role in the future for BMD and we've seen it already over Israel (check the follow on tweet)
Here's a video (compressed to hell for public release ofc) but shows EOTS footage of Houthi MRBM interception with an Arrow 3.
Lot 15 delivered F-35s were supposed to roll out w a next generation DAS (made by Raytheon) that provides improved performance over the current NG one but haven't heard anything about it recently. Though we know it has been in flight testing.