We are within minutes of the release of the new opinions. The Supreme Court has reduced the docket to a roux of huge cases touching on the authority of federal agencies (Loper) to the 2024 election (Trump) to the J6 defendants (Fischer) to the right to be homeless (City of Grants Pass)...
...As I mentioned yesterday, we still do not have certainty that all of the decisions will be released today. If they are, Roberts has decided to hold the World Series, the World Cup. and the Super Bowl on the same day...
...Five minute buzzer...
...There is a report of two boxes. That may indicate that we will indeed have opinions next week...
...Here we go. Buckle up ...
...We have our first opinion. It is Grants Pass v. Johnson. Justice Gorsuch writes for the majority with Sotomayor dissenting with Jackson and Kagan. 9th Circuit is reversed.
...Eighth Amendment is not violated by using generally applicable laws regulating camping on public property...
...An interesting ending for Sotomayor who read her dissent. ""I remain hopeful that someday in the near future, this Court will play its role in safeguarding constitutional liberties for the most vulnerable among us." For those who insist that stare decisis is under attack, we often forget that it is often honored in the breach by both sides. I have never subscribed to the inviolate elements to stare decisis...
...However, it often seems that pundits go into vapors when favored opinions are set aside while they have no problem with overturning less favored opinions...
...We have our third opinion. We have Loper! Chief Justice Roberts writes for the majority. Chevron is now as dead as Dillinger.
...Roberts finally delivers the coup de grace on Chevron in a 6-2 decision.
...Notably, after Sotomayor said that she hoped to reverse the decision on homeless rights, the court just did that on Chevron. Roberts is saying that Chevron was a "misguided."
...This has been the Holy Grail for those who oppose the administrative state. It is also a victory for Trump whose appointees put the Court over the top in taking down Chevron...
...Justice Kagan is vehement that this is an outrageous clawback on federal agency authority because Chevron "has become part of the warp and woof of modern government." That is certainly true but many disagree that it was a good change in a Madisonian system based on tripartite government...
...It is important to note that this Republic did exist before Chevron. I have long been a critic of the case because I felt that it undermined the Madisonian system. Courts will now perform their constitutional and traditional function in review...
...In combination with SEC v. Jarkesy, the court is not just empowering courts but citizens in fights with federal agencies...
...In SEC v. Jarkesy, the Court ruled that citizens charged with civil penalties have the right to a jury trial, under the Seventh Amendment. Now agencies will not be able to count on sweeping deference in their interpretations. Also keep in mind that the Court has embraced the "major questions" doctrine to demand greater clarity in some of these cases...
...We have the fourth case. It is Fischer! Huge day...
...A major loss for the Biden Administration. The Court rules that the "novel interpretation would criminalize a broad swath of prosaic conduct, exposing activists and lobbyists alike to decades in prison."
...This is a big win for Trump as well. It knocks out a substantial part of the case of Jack Smith against the former president. It also knocks out hundreds of convictions...
...Obviously, there were other charges like trespass that will not be impacted. However, this hits hundreds of cases. Those cases must now be reviewed on just on the underlying convictions but sentencing in many cases. It will not impact those cases which only went forward on trespass which are also numbers in the hundreds...
....For Trump, this rips the wings of the plane that Jack Smith has been trying to take off in D.C. In an ordinary case, there would be a superseding indictment. Smith may try to go forward on the remaining counts. However, it is hard to see how the indictment holds together after this decision...
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
In responding to a challenge from Sen. Fetterman to prove that he did not send naked pictures to women, Graham Platner immediately raised the Jews, declaring that Fetterman is a tool of AIPAC. It appears that the tattoo may be obscured, but a certain obsession remains...
...Graham wrote that Fetterman is not disliked due to his hoodie: "It's not the hoodie, dude. It's because you've become a stooge for AIPAC and the Republican party." Notably, it is the same narrative of his defenders.
...Graham is accused of assault, degrading women, defaming veterans, mocking rape victims, praising Hamas, and ridiculing rural people. However, the real problem is again AIPAC and the Jews?
I strongly disagree with the push for a constitutional amendment to bar foreign-born legislators. foxnews.com/politics/mace-… While I have suggested the possible tinyurl.com/f86u4tce, I cannot think of anything more antithetical to our founding than barring foreign-born citizens from Congress. As a nation of immigrants, it is a reaffirmation of our heritage to have these citizens serve in government...
...Such an amendment would bar members ranging from Sen. Bernie Moreno, R-Ohio, to Victoria Spartz, R-Ind. to Ilhan Omar, D-Minn., to Young Kim, R-Calif.. Regardless of their politics or controversies, they represent inspiring achievements in their communities and a reaffirmation of our core values.
...The founders themselves were immigrants and many foreign-born citizens have served with great distinction in our military and our government.
I recently wrote on Marc Elias responding to the Virginia Supreme Court's adverse opinion on gerrymandering by reminding citizens that they can eliminate the entire Virginia government. Elias cannot understand why I and others find his posting notable...jonathanturley.org/2026/05/13/dem…
...He notes that he is merely quoting the Constitution after all. It is like responding to an adverse trade ruling by the WTO by quoting Article I, Section 8, Clause 11 on the ability of Congress to declare war. It is a rather extreme measure to invoke...tinyurl.com/5dhz5eur
...The posting came as Democrats pushed to sack-and-pack the Virginia Supreme Court, reminding people that they could go even further in taking down part or all of the Virginia government for being denied the right to effectively eliminate all Republican representations in the purple state... jonathanturley.org/2026/05/10/gut…
The collective primal scream session is continuing over the decision of the Virginia Supreme Court that Democrats violated the Constitution in the gerrymandering vote. Yet, Sen. Tim Kaine offered a moment of unintended levity when he questioned why the Court waited so long...
...Kaine questioned why the Court did not rule earlier. However, it was the Democrats who insisted on the Court waiting. The Court had a whole section on how the Commonwealth insisted on the delay...
...Kaine previously made headlines by denouncing those who believe in natural law and God-given rights as little better than Iranian mullahs. Here, Kaine is criticizing a court for not explaining a delay that his party demanded and the court addressed.jonathanturley.org/2025/09/08/the…
...Justice Alito (as anticipated) wrote the majority opinion, ruling that the 2024 map mandating a second majority-black district, was "an unconstitutional racial gerrymander."...
...From Alito: "Correctly understood, Section 2 does not impose liability at odds with the Constitution, and it should not have imposed liability on Louisiana for its 2022 map. Compliance with Section 2 thus could not justify the State's use of race-based redistricting here."
Todd Blanche is speaking now and says that there are other cases similar to the Comey indictment where guilty pleas have been entered or cases are going to trial...
...Director Kash Patel just confirmed that this has been investigated for almost a year. He emphasized that career employees found this evidence and a grand jury returned this true bill. He noted that the grand jury was made aware that Comey withdrew the posting and apologized. That is an interesting fact since it will be raised in any trial, if this makes it to a trial.
...Blanche is emphasizing that this is just one example that the Justice Department will not take threats lightly. Blanche says that they will prove intent with witnesses and other conventional evidence...