🧵for the new residents and students on the meaning of 'French' and 'Gauge'.
We've covered this on here in the past, but a lot of new people are starting on surgical rotations, so let's look at them again.
As usual, we'll cover their history and what they mean. (1/ )
If you just want the short version:
The term 'French' is a unit of measurement of the *outer diameter* of a circular (or nearly circular) device.
1 'French' = 1/3 millimeters (or 0.33 mm if you prefer)
It's a direct measurement, so larger tubes have higher 'French' sizes.
'French' isn't named for France 🇫🇷 , the country.
It's (indirectly) named after a person -- Joseph-Frédéric-Benoît Charrière, a knifemaker who was born in Switzerland 🇨🇭 but moved to Paris later on. He went on to become the premier surgical instrument maker of his time.
When Charrière made instruments, he picked his own unit of measurement that corresponded to 1/3 of a millimeter...this was the 'Charrière'.
But English speakers struggled to pronounce 'Charrière', so the companies changed it to 'French'. So 1 'French' became 1/3 millimeter.
Only things that are circular tubes have a 'French'. So things like central lines, NG tubes, Foleys, etc. The 'French' (almost) always refers to the *outer diameter* of a tube. For example, an 18 Fr NG tube has an outer diameter of 6 mm.
(We’ll look at exceptions to this later).
Here is a 7 Fr triple lumen central line. Again, the '7 Fr' refers to the line's *outer diameter*.
It doesn't matter how many lumens it may have: that's a separate issue. It's 7 Fr, and therefore its *outer* diameter is 7/3 = 2.33 mm.
It's the same unit of measurement for (almost) all devices: A 12 Fr NG tube has the same outer diameter as a 12 Fr dialysis catheter, a 12 Fr Foley catheter, or a 12 Fr chest tube.
All of 12 Fr devices shown here will have an outer diameter of 12/3 = 4 mm.
I should point out that on the regular 'Argyle' type chest tubes, we're bending the rules a little bit.
These chest tubes are actually oval in shape, so we probably shouldn't use 'French', but we do. In this case the measurement is along the long axis of the chest tube.
On the other hand:
Vascular access sheaths, such as those used in cardiology or interventional radiology, are often described differently.
Here, it's often simpler to instead describe the sheath in terms of *what will fit through it*. After all, that's what the sheaths are for.
Here is a diagram of a '6 Fr' vascular access sheath.
Note that label is referring to the *inner* diameter here. The outer diameter is larger. In this case the '6 Fr' means that's what we can fit through the sheath.
It is the *opposite* of how 'French' is used elsewhere.
One thing about surgical drains often leads to confusion:
Jackson-Pratt drains are *not* circular, so they are *not* measured in French -- they are measured in mm.
-but-
Blake drains *are* circular and they *are* measured in 'French'.
This can be deceiving, as we'll see next.
This difference in the way JP's and Blake drains are measured means that a 'size 10' JP drain is actually considerably LARGER than a 'size 19' Blake drain.
Note that the 19 Blake has a 6.33 mm diameter, whereas the '10' JP drain is 10 mm wide. 🧐📏
In some countries were people have less difficulty pronouncing 'Charrière', the catheters instead often use the 'Ch' abbreviation instead of 'French'.
Here we see an '18 Ch' Foley, and we are reminded again that this means it's 6 mm in diameter.
On the other hand 'Gauge' is an entirely different kind of measurement.
'Gauge' refers to the Birmingham Gauge system, devised in the 1900's in England for manufacturing metal wire. It later became used for IV catheters.
There are a couple of major differences...
First, as the 'Gauge' number gets *larger*, the IV's get *smaller*. This is the opposite of the 'French' system (and most other systems).
As you can see here, a 14 Ga IV catheter is much LARGER than a 24 Ga catheter.
Also the 'Gauge' sizes are somewhat arbitrary...and the spacing between them isn't consistent.
So a 12 Gauge IV is *not* exactly twice the diameter of a 24 Gauge IV, for example.
If you do the math here, you see these relationships are neither linear nor consistent.
Finally, as a trauma surgeon, I have to point out one of my favorite teaching points: The flow rate of a 16 G IV is **twice** that of an 18 G IV.
So the difference between those two IV's may not sound much at first, but it makes a big difference for major resuscitations.
⬛️
Addendum:
Someone thankfully pointed out an unfortunate error in the thread...
'36 Fr' is actually 12 mm, whereas I had accidentally listed it in an earlier picture as '13 mm'. 😬
Addendum #2:
@TylerLarsenMD has a thread going into more detail about the gauge system:
⬇️
🧵for junior trainees regarding the use of the non-dominant hand for surgical procedures:
We'll go over why it's probably even more important than your 'dominant' hand, and what I think is the key to developing proficiency with it, which may not be what you'd guess. 🧐 (1/ )
For this 🧵, I will use the words 'left' and 'right' instead of 'non-dominant' and 'dominant', respectively.
This is done purely to save characters in Twitter, as using longer words tends to take up more space.
Left-handed surgeons will of course have to reverse these terms.
I'll start by saying that I'm not 'ambidextrous' and I don't try to be, nor do I think it's worth it to try to force yourself to use the L hand for things the R hand normally does.
Instead, it's better to recognize that each hand plays a *different* role in surgical procedures.
🧵regarding some of the more novel *non-urologic* uses of Foley catheters.
It's been almost 2 years since I originally posted this, so many may not have seen this one (and I'll be doing reruns for a while...I need to spend April getting ready for #ASGBI2024 🧐.
(1/ )
Foley catheters have actually been used intracranially, believe it or not...😬
Yang et al (2019) used Foley catheters to fill the cavities left after brain tumor resection in order to decrease hemorrhage and other complications.
Foley catheters have been used to provide tamponade for temporary hemorrhage control in patients with penetrating neck trauma. (several authors - here's a representative picture).
This will be a common theme for a number of other areas of the body, as we'll see.
🧵regarding the concept of 'stay sutures', which are used in almost every surgical specialty in circumstances where you need to retract or manipulate tissue, but a standard retractor or forceps won't do.
We'll go over the uses of stay sutures and show some examples.
(1/)
The origin of the term 'stay suture' is unclear, and other names may be used.
I shall use the term to mean a temporary suture that is placed in order to retract the tissue or otherwise manipulate it. They normally take the place of a retractor, forceps, or one's hand(s).
'Stay sutures' may be useful in many situations, including:
- when a retractor would get in the way
- when you don't have an assistant or you need the assistant's hands free
- when the tissue is difficult to grab with forceps
- (and others)
🧵regarding the 'rapidly absorbable' sutures, which are used less often than other suture types, but fill specific roles in a number of different surgical specialties.
We'll go over the uses of (and differences between) Chromic, plain gut, 'fast' gut, and Vicryl Rapide.
(1/)
Catgut has been used for suturing for many centuries, but it first became industrialized by the German company B Braun.
It is not (and probably never was) made from cats; instead it comes from the serosal layer of beef intestine or the submucosal layer of sheep intestine.
Catgut sutures are strands of ~90% collagen that are purified and chemically processed.
Because collagen is a protein, the longevity of the sutures is very much affected by any proteolytic enzymes in the local environment. We'll see why this is important later.
🧵regarding the 117 deaths in The Iliad where Homer provided details about the mechanism of injury:
Here we will run an M&M conference to consider whether these deaths might have been preventable if the Achaeans and Trojans had modern Level 1 trauma centers at the time. (1/ )
Background:
Recently, I read 'The Iliad' and noticed how often Homer described deaths with anatomic detail.
I then decided to look at these cases as though they occurred near a modern Level 1 trauma center with full capabilities.
Butler's 1898 English translation was used.
Methods:
Assumptions and simplifications included:
- The Achaeans and Trojans each have their own trauma centers
- rapid 'scoop and run' prehospital transport
- the cases present individually, and there are no 'mass casualty' scenarios that would overwhelm the system.
We'll go over basic concepts about knots and how to tie the '1-handed' knot.
We will also explore why one of the 'throws' is harder than the other, and a different way to do it that may be new to many who trained in surgery in the U.S. (1/ )
First, let's look at a few basics common to all square knots.
All of the different 'throws' involve creating a loop and then passing one of the two strands through the loop.
What we call '2-handed' or '1-handed' knots are just ways we've learned to do this. Nothing more.
In fact for 2-handed knots, both of the 'throws' follow the same idea:
You are creating a loop, and then passing the string in your nondominant hand through the loop (the green string).
The only thing that differs between the two throws is your initial starting position.