Our current situation should give Dems a rejuvenating chance to focus better on fixing what’s gone wrong in America.
We face three huge threats: persistent internal attacks on our democracy, unbridled climate upheaval, and a captured Court with some deeply corrupt justices.
🧵
Behind each threat is dark money; massive anonymous political spending by special interests who hide their identities from the public.
The political class has reoriented itself to this new reality, pivoting to the big secret spenders. Voters notice they’re not so important anymore.
An entire dark-money ecosystem has been spawned, with front groups, ‘Donors Trusts,’ coordinating 501c3s and c4s, and superPACs.
This whole filthy bestiary of influence is new (or refocused and expanded) since Citizens United.
It didn’t used to be this way; it doesn’t have to be this way.
Democrats keep voting to get rid of dark money, and Republicans keep voting to protect dark money, but voters have no idea. We basically haven’t told them.
Which is pathetic because voters hate dark money with a passion, Republicans, independents and Democrats alike. Polling is off the charts.
(When done, that is; too often pollsters blow the dust each year off their polling questions from the ‘90s and this question doesn’t get asked!)
Climate change is out of control because of a massive dark-money politics and propaganda operation run by the fossil fuel industry.
Before Citizens United, climate was a bipartisan concern (see McCain 2008 platform); fossil-fuel dark money killed bipartisanship.
The Court was captured by a dark-money operation funded by creepy polluter billionaires and managed by their creepy minion Leonard Leo.
The ‘amenable’ justices are instructed via coordinated flotillas of dark-money amici curiae, with correlation near perfect between instruction and result.
Republicans are complicit in all this because the dark money behind these schemes is also the dark money billions behind their political operations.
It’s a trifecta; dark money is behind climate denial, Court capture and corruption of Congress — one crew, one plan, one cancer in the body politic.
Democrats should be blowing the whistle on the whole dark-money rot.
It explains so much, it has obvious villains, and it has the added benefit of being true.
We are in a war for our future and we should behave that way.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I’m not the only one thinking that if justices were not hip-deep in smelly billionaire gifts and gratuities, they might not be rewriting anti-corruption laws to protect public officials receiving smelly gifts and gratuities. slate.com/news-and-polit…
The good parts: when “public servants can get soft kickbacks for their official acts and that’s just fine … this vision is fundamentally corrosive to a democratic government.”
No bueno when elected officials are responsive “to a narrow slice of wealthy people and corporations who happen to be in a position to reward them for their official acts.” Yeah, the slice that put them on the Court.
Today, the Supreme Court reversed the Fifth Circuit in a case about limiting COVID misinformation spread through social media, holding the plaintiffs lacked standing to sue.
But what exactly does “standing” mean, and why does it matter?
Let’s unpack that. 🧵
Standing is the term for when someone has a real interest or injury that gives them a right to sue.
It matters. The Constitution keeps courts in check by limiting them to resolving genuine “cases or controversies.” Without it, a case must be dismissed.
And this doesn’t even count the oily fossil fuel fingers in the long and tawdry scheme to pack the Court with captured justices who will do billionaires’ and polluters’ bidding.
“Oh, what a tangled web we weave, when first we practice to deceive.” — Walter Scott, relevant for Clarence Thomas.
Oh, what a saga it is. 🧵
It begins with Harlan-Crow-to-Clarence-Thomas freebie-yacht-and-jet-travel Round One. As Judge Wolf testified in my subcommittee, this was buried in the Judicial Conference a decade ago, with no public findings or report.
Thomas did not get the message, and kept taking the freebies, which led to Crow-to-Thomas yacht-and-jet-freebies-PLUS*, Round Two, exposed thanks to Pulitzer-Prize-winning reporting by ProPublica.