Doha Profile picture
Jul 3 20 tweets 9 min read Read on X
A thread on the F-35's radar. (1/20) 🧵

The F-35 (all variants) currently carries the APG-81 radar, and starting at production lot 17 (2026ish), F-35's with a new radar (APG-85) will roll out of the production line.
I'll go over the basic and some stuff on APG-85 Image
The APG-81 is a 3rd gen AESA radar made by Northrop, which derives from the original APG-77 on F-22. It has 1,676 Gallium Arsenide (GaAs) T/RMs. The radar features great LPI characteristics (allowing the aircraft to use the radar w low chance of detection) and long-range
Image
Image
passive and active modes for A-A/A-G,
allowing the aircraft to complete A-A/A-G missions. The APG-81 also serves as the primary emitter for the EW suite (ASQ-239 Barracuda), with the ability to *provide 10 times the effective radiated power of a Prowler* (a dedicated EW platform)
From "FIGHTER'S REPLACEMENT" by Chris Thatcher quoting Stephen Obryan (former senior Lockheed official)
Image
APG-81 operating in X band means the F-35 can perform powerful jamming in the forward area in X band, while in theory, in other band with weaker signals, though there's no reports of that.
Besides jamming, the radar's electronic attack capabilities include creating and showing
Image
Image
false targets to enemy systems, network attacks, and algorithm-packed data streams. The specifics on the F-35's EW and Cyber warfare capabilities are ofc, some of the highly classified stuff, but from what's available, it's highly capable.
web.archive.org/web/2015041310…
Image
In testing within 100 miles, the APG-81 has demonstrated the ability to detect and track 19 targets in 3 seconds and 23 targets in 9 seconds, including targets going towards the opposite direction, while searching for more.

Image
Back in 2009, Lockheed's Catbird aircraft, which was carrying the F-35's entire avionics suite, was able to jam the F-22's radar (the original APG-77).
While APG-81 has great jamming capabilities, its ECCM (jamming resistance) is also Goated. Back in 2010, a joint Northrop and US gov team won the David Packard Excellence in Acquisition Award because of the APG-81's performance against jammer.
investor.northropgrumman.com/news-releases/…
Image
For air to ground, the APG-81 can create high-resolution SAR imageries of targets in the ground from long ranges and automatically identify them, including non emitting ones, allowing the aircraft to engage targets like turned off radars. The targets are identified using MDFs.

Image
Image
Image
Here's a comparison between the SAR image created by a radar on a "legacy" aircraft and APG-81 Image
Providing highly accurate Ground Moving Target Indicator (GMTI) data on SAR maps Image
APG-81 can also detect and track maritime targets Image
Being a part of the sensor fusion, if there are targets that have been detected by other things on the aircraft (the EW suite or DAS for example) but not the radar, or vice versa, the fusion will tell the radar or the other sensors where to look based on info already gathered. Image
This allows the APG-81 to be slaved to that data track and then detect and track the object with a very narrow beam at a longer range while decreasing the chance of interception. This is ofc not unique to APG-81, and same for other radar's when they know where to search for. Image
The APG-81 working w DAS has also shown the ability to track multiple rocket midflight (Nasa's Terrier Orion).
The yellow shows radar track while the purple shows DAS detection and track. This capability is important for current and future BMD, where the F-35 can send the data
Image
Image
it gathered to platforms like AEGIS equipped DDG or land based A/D batteries. The distance the rockets were detected and tracked from isn't known, but in another testing, DAS has demonstrated the ability to track Falcon 9 from 1,300+ km

Image
As I've mentioned earlier that the APG-81 derives from the F-22's original radar (APG-77). It's worth mentioning that the F-22 (starting in Lot 5) started receiving a new radar (APG-77v1) that uses some of the technology from the APG-81 (the air to ground modes for examples). Image
As of late 2022, Northrop Grumman delivered over a thousand APG-81, and since then, likely hundreds more. It's unclear whether the upcoming APG-85 will be available to international F-35 buyers, but if not, then the APG-81 line will run for a long time. Image
There's not much info revealed about the APG-85, but it's pretty much given that it'll do everything the APG-81 can (probably even go beyond those capabilities) and do those things better. While it's not confirmed, it's extremely likely that it'll have Gallium Nitride (GaN) T/RMs Image
A new radar is one of the 88 upgrade/new capabilities the F-35 will get as part of the Block 4 upgrade. The contract for the first 5 lot has already been awarded, and the JPO was planning on awarding the next 3 as of late last year. Those lots will cover several hundred APG-85s./ Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Doha

Doha Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doha104p3

Jun 26
The F-35's datalink capabilities (1/18) 🧵

The F-35 has 2 primary data links. They are Link 16 and MADL. I'll go over the general stuff and focus more on MADL here since people are kinda familiar with Link 16. + some extra stuff Image
Both Link 16 and MADL are 2 major parts of Northrop's ASQ-242 integrated Communication, Navigation, and Identification system (CNI). CNI was designed to give F-35 advanced communication capabilities, and in total, it includes more than 27 functionalities. Image
Link 16 is the standard datalink for NATO. it operates in the UHF spectrum and uses omni/multi-directional UHF radios to transmit things. Those things can be imageries, tracks of airborne targets, messages, etc. When communicating or sharing things with 4th gen aircraft, AWACS, Image
Read 18 tweets
Feb 23
Some (most) of the shit Turkish accounts are posting today are pure brain rot.
All the aircraft mentioned except Su-57 and Indian one (which is yet to fly) first flight went well.
The F-35 crashed less than 15 times after 800k flight hours, having one of the best crash record
Image
KAAN flew only once and yall are already over hyping the fuck out of it
Turkish Aerospace industry has come a long way. And congratulations on the first flight, but your aircraft isn't superior to F-35, nor to F-22, and likely not to J-20 either. Some of these posts r stupid.
Also, some Turkish dude made this whatever you wanna call it.
This probably can't be more inaccurate.
Not only is the frontal rcs figures for the F-35 so off, the radar range part is even off.
As someone who's been following this program for a long time, I'm yet to see figures Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 25
Herritage's new report calls USAF "very weak", mainly due to low readiness rate, shortage of pilots, and pilots not getting enough flight hours.
These are valid concerns, but saying "very weak" is just dumb. Also, not their first time.
heritage.org/military-stren…
Image
While I definitely do not agree w their conclusion, the report also includes some stuff like aircraft and munitions inventory. USAF has 1,432 active-duty fighters, with 886 of them being combat-coded.
Also, more F-35As than any other aircraft variant in *active duty*.
Image
Image
1/ Aircraft age and capability scores
2/ Munition expenditures vs acquisition (I doubt the numbers for FY-24)
3/ USAF budget breakdown
Again, it's Herritage foundation yall

Image
Image
Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 2, 2023
So, here's a thread on the times the F-35 has been used in combat. (The dates are not in order)🧵 Image
In 2018, 🇮🇱 became the first to use F-35 in combat. According to an Israeli major Gen, “We are flying the F-35 all over the ME and have already attacked twice on two different fronts”. Didn't specify what they hit, but released a photo of F-35I over 🇱🇧
haaretz.com/middle-east-ne…
Image
On April of 2019, USAF used their F-35A for the first time. 2 F-35A's armed with JDAMs conducted airstrikes against weapons cache deep in the Hamrin Mountains and an entrenched Daesh tunnel network in Iraq.
af.mil/News/Article-D…
Read 10 tweets
Jun 17, 2023
Communication problem, Carriers's EW & Air defense aside.
Show me a drone that Is cheap, can hit a *moving ship*, hard to jam, Has the necessary range (1,200+ km at least), has the speed (avg drone speeds 200>kmph, will take u 5 hrs to hit something over 1k km away). (1/
And Carries explosives big enough to do some damage...
if one solves all these problems to an
extent, then the resultant drone will
be quite big, easy to detect, & will cost millions of dollar. That will reduce the size of the drone army significantly.
And if some does manages to hit the Carrier, At best your drone army can hope to cause damage on the flight deck to stop air operations. But the flight deck is armoured too and USN's fire and damage control is legendary.
Read 7 tweets
May 17, 2023
"People talk about in Missile Defence, the difficulty of hitting bullet with a bullet. But I will tell you that where we are with the technology today - we can do better than that. We can hit a spot on bullet, with a bullet and that's actually what we do in our Missile Defence..
tests" - Lt. Gen. Henry, Former Director of Missile Defence Agency.
Basically, with the kinetic HTK warhead on our interceptors (Pac3, THAAD, SM3), hits a specific part of the BM. normally, the warhead. And SM3 has demonstrated that capability IRL when it shot down USA-193.
when SM-3 Block IA shot down the malfunctioning satellite (USA 193), It specifically hit the fuel tank containing toxic hydrazine.
*Target View from SM-3’s Kinetic Warhead prior to impact* 🔽
en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation… Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(