All right. Here is my long, nuanced take on the last week of Biden panic and media chaos.
I'm probably going to make a lot of people on every side mad with at least part of what I have to say here.
1) Biden is genuinely older than he was, does not have the physical stamina he used to, and it is apparent in his speeches.
2) It is also apparent in his speeches he is cognitively fine. He answers questions sharply and with policy nuance. He just sounds tired doing it.
3) Biden is inherently distrustful of elite journalists and don't give them the access they believe they deserve.
4) This has caused a reporter vendetta that is fueling the current media cycle.
5) This has ALSO caused Biden's team to be ill-equipped in getting him visible with the public.
6) That lack of immediate visibility in the wake of the debate has caused real alarm among Democratic lawmakers that triggered leaks that further feed the media frenzy.
7) At the same time, Biden's antipathy to the press is exaggerated. He DOES sit for interviews often, just with local sources and talk show hosts, not Beltway reporters.
8) This further fuels Beltway reporter resentment towards him because they feel they're entitled to access.
9) Beltway reporters had a serious decline in quality in the Trump years, started asking dumber, more gossipy and less policy-based questions and this trend has continued under Biden.
10) That further intensified Biden's handlers' choice to limit his interactions with them.
11) The press focus on all of this is not nothing. It's based on real fears from Democrats who were banking a lot of their confidence he could bounce back in polls on voters seeing Biden's competence, and they're afraid that won't happen now.
12) Trump's and SCOTUS' threats to democracy and his own personal and mental issues are, objectively, still a much more newsworthy and important issue than all of this, and the feeding frenzy has completely shut it all out for many voters who need that information.
13) If Biden wants to survive, he has to suck up his resentment of the press, rightly or wrongly, and give them the access and unscripted engagement they are demanding of him.
14) If he can't, Democrats aren't wrong to have a serious conversation about replacing him with Harris.
15) Democrats can still win the election either with Biden or with Harris. Polls show just about every voter from 2020 who hated Trump still hates him.
16) If the election were held today, Trump would be the favorite. Democrats have to change course.
Okay. I've said my piece.
Happy Independence Day.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
With Detroit seeing a population and economic rebound, it's worth exploring what exactly caused the city to fall so hard — because there are REALLY important lessons for a lot of other U.S. cities, some of which are making similar mistakes to Detroit and not realizing it.
The standard answer that politicians and economists will give you is "the auto industry changed, there weren't as many jobs as there used to be, so the population declined."
This is true, but it's really not the whole story.
The follow-up question here, that rarely gets asked, is, WHY does a population crash mean the city goes bankrupt? There are fewer taxpayers, sure, but there's also fewer people using public services, so shouldn't it all kind of even out?
Biden gave Netanyahu months — literally months — to explain what his plan was for keeping the civilians he forcibly evacuated to Rafah safe if they bomb that area.
He was very clear they needed to have that plan or we'd cut him off.
Netanyahu ignored him. Totally blew him off.
The U.S. has *already* at this point bent several of its own laws that require countries receiving our weapons sales to allow a certain level of humanitarian aid in, to keep Israel supplied for a war that it absolutely has the money and manufacturing to prosecute 100% on its own.
Netanyahu has no one to blame but himself for Biden losing his patience and drawing a line on invading Rafah.
Yes, Hamas has been a bad faith actor. Yes, they started the war. That doesn't mean Israel gets a pass to flatten civilians in the city ISRAEL TOLD THEM TO GO TO.
Actually, it's bad that California's average property tax rate is that low. Really bad.
Excessively low property taxes is a big reason why California is so unaffordable for middle-class workers, and why so many of them are moving to Texas.
Ever since Proposition 13 set hard limits on property taxes in California, cities there have had a big problem. Previously when they had budget deficits on infrastructure, education and public services, they could raise property taxes to plug the gap. But now, they can't do that.
So what these cities do is, instead of taxing the people who own the houses, they tax the developers building the houses. It's called "impact fees." Developers have to pay cities tens or hundreds of thousands of dollars for every unit of housing they build.
Sigh... every year I have to explain this. THIS PART OF THE TAX CODE HAS A VERY GOOD REASON FOR EXISTING.
Of course the IRS doesn't expect criminals to follow it. The idea is that when they DON'T follow it, they can then get charged with tax evasion on top of their other crimes.
Organized crime bosses are hard to prosecute because they can kill, threaten, or intimidate any witnesses to their crimes.
But it's MUCH harder for them to beat tax evasion. Because they clearly have the money, and clearly didn't file a tax return and declare how they earned it.
That is why this provision exists. So that in the event that a mobster silences anyone who could prove their murder, racketeering, etc, the IRS can still nail them for not reporting how they got their ill-gotten gains.
Neither side wants "a secular binational one state solution for Jews AND Palestinians" because both sides are (rightly) terrified of what would happen if the other elected a majority to rule over that combined country.
The *only* path to peace is both of them getting a state.
What's maddening about the whole Colorado decision is that tons of people aren't even trying to argue the court erred — they're just saying, "we should ignore what the plain text of the Constitution says and let Trump run anyway for the sake of avoiding political controversy."
If you want to argue Trump didn't really participate in an insurrection, go for it — the trial court found mountains of evidence that he did, and even Trump's *own lawyers* have called January 6 an insurrection, but you're welcome to argue why the trial court is wrong.
Likewise, if you want to argue the President of the United States isn't an "officer" as intended by the 14th Amendment, that's a stretch, but hey, the trial court judge ruled that, that's probably what the Supreme Court will rule, so you're in good company, go for it.