Are valved masks cooler? I tested 3 different 3M N95s to try to learn more about the effect of valves on heat in respirators.
Not much mathematical difference on average, under these specific conditions, with these 3 masks:
V-Flex +7.3°C
Valved Aura +7.3°C
No Valve Aura +7.5°C
I expect that results could vary dramatically under different conditions, including temperature, humidity, airflow rate, mask model and more. Even so, I was surprised that the valve didn't make a more substantial difference in average in-mask temperature.
I also tested valved and unvalved Auras during 15 minute outdoor walks in mixed shade and sun and got a similar lack of difference in average in mask temperatures (using different testing gear with 10 second intervals between samples).
The ambient readings were subject to heat from direct sunlight in the mixed shade and sun walk, so it's a bit hard to evaluate the difference in temperatures. I'm not even going to try to average them for deltas.
First mask is a valveless 3M Aura 9210+, 2nd is a valved 9211+.
The walking test was in ambient relative humidity of between ~35 and 40%.
I think a lot more tests are needed as these preliminary results are a bit limited and inconclusive. But they do suggest not to count on much temp reduction just from the addition of an exhalation valve.
(One issue that may be confounding my results is that all the masks I tested are very breathable masks - some of the best N95s available - which may make the airflow enabled by the exhalation valve more redundant than in the case of valves on less breathable masks.)
(I also don't know if that increase in temperature above ambient in between tests is due to the 1 cm proximity of the thermocouple next to my face, or if it's thermal conduction in the wire that is taped to my cheek to allow ot to fit under the mask up to sensor at the end.)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Testing the AIRfanta Lite4 - the full length video.
I used several kinds of testing machines to characterize the amount and location of protection this portable laminar flow air purifier @Engineer_Wong sent me for review.
The video has a PortaCount test as well as the AeroTrak test - they measure different sized particles. I used a different particle range in the AeroTrak graph in the video than the one I posted on Twitter earlier, but they both illustrate the on vs. off axis protection levels.
I've added an introduction talking about the context of layers of mitigation, to help better evaluate whether this could help you or not - spoiler, it's upside if you use it for an unavoidable situation where you can't wear a mask, such as a dental visit...
Can a special laminar air purifier protect you where you have to go maskless, or let you take off your respirator where you normally would not?
@Engineer_Wong sent me an AIRfanta 4Lite to try out.
Tests showed the near field protection to be narrow, and less than mask level.
I used an optical particle counter to confirm my PortaCount measurements, and the results are similar.
This bubble chart shows how the count of particles even slightly off-line of the center axis of the air flow is higher.
(Unfiltered ambient count upper left.)
This is a visualization of the center line of the airflow from above using a line laser and two mini-foggers. Note the narrow cone of clean air that tapers off with distance.
(Thanks to @FitTestMyPlanet for suggesting brighter laser than I had, and green + IR safety optics.)
8 of the top 10 hits on Amazon for "respirator" are copies of the 3M 6200. Are they safe?
I tested one Amazon sent me for review, and the results are far worse than I expected: a 33% leak.
Don't trust generic respirators to protect your health.
The mask fit test results:
Generic 6200 Fit Factor: 3
Genuine 3M 6200 Fit Factor: 9612
The 3M performed 3204 times better than the copy.
Another 6200 copy tested better: FF 27. Still short of the needed min. of 100.
All copies tested significantly lower than genuine 3M.
The exhalation valve in the 6200 copy is defective. It allows unfiltered air in through the exhaust port.
The defective valve only closes if you breathe in forcefully, which is why the deep breathing exercise scored higher than the normal breathing exercise - opposite of normal.
Can a black KN95 over a 3M Aura, as seen worn by @ModelAyshaMirza, pass a fit test ?
Short answer: Yes, it can. It did on me.
Longer answer: Fit is very individual. You'll need your own fit test to know. Double masking often reduces fit a bit, but can also improve it. YMMV.
To test this double masking configuration, I first tested the 3M Aura 9205+ worn normally on my face by itself. I used a PortaCount in N99 mode.
Full OSHA N99 mode fit factor: 355
That essentially means the air inside the mask is 355 times cleaner, total inward leakage 0.3%.
I then tested the KN95 worn normally on my face.
Full OSHA N99 mode fit factor: 3
Total inward leakage: 33%
It fit me very poorly and leaked a lot at the nose bridge. The filter media is not very breathable. So it has the potential to be a bad combination when double masking.
Lots of people would like unobtrusive respiratory protection, and nostril filters are an attractive option, or they *could be* if they work, and if you only breathe in through your nose.
🧵
I was given these by Amazon to review. They are from O2 Armor, who provide more filter data than most companies. But check their wording and compare it to their filtration efficiency graph..."up to" is doing a lot of heavy lifting.
You can see in these macro photos how loose the weave of the nostril filter is to make it breathable at such a small size. Compare that to the Drager N95 filter shown at the same magnification.
Electrostatic attraction can make a filter work better than it looks, however...
The top discounted respirators are part for part copies of 3M half masks. They have the appearance of a NOSH approved 3M respirator, but without the performance or quality control.
There are some genuine NIOSH approved respirators on sale at Amazon, including some 3M, but you have to look carefully. The copies look identical and even have the same model numbers, but *usually* don't have the 3M or NIOSH logos.
When you buy a respirator you are *trusting* that it will work, trusting the science, NIOSH rules and approvals, 3M, and the distribution chain.
There is literally no reason to trust a generic respirator from Amazon. They are sold by disposable companies with no accountability