SCOOP: The NIH is giving $250m to universities to hire medical scientists who show “an interest in DEI.”
The NIH says the program doesn't “discriminate against any group.” Public records tell a different story.
As one email put it, “I don’t want to hire white men for sure."
The NIH FIRST program funds “cluster hiring” at universities and med schools around the country.
The program follows a popular model, reasoning that universities would hire minorities as a byproduct of heavily weighing DEI statements. On paper it bars racial preferences.
But in grant proposals, for projects funded by the NIH, universities repeatedly and openly state they'll restrict who they hire on the basis of race.
Vanderbilt University Medical Center promises to hire 18-20 "Black, Latinx, American Indian, and Pacific Islander" scientists.
Emails show how this worked in practice.
At the University of New Mexico, the program gave each underrepresented minority a "second look" in the search process.
In one email, faculty ask whether a south Asian job finalist was a "second look" candidate.
He didn't count. So they eliminated him. Noting that the department was "really low on women."
Other emails show search committees closely scrutinizing the race and sex of job candidates.
At one point, an NIH program official stated that race candidates should have no bearing on hiring.
This confused the grant recipients, who speculated that maybe the official "has" to say it that way, noting that she’d hinted at this before over zoom.
The records raise serious questions about the NIH FIRST program. And about the use of diversity statements in faculty hiring. Lawmakers should investigate both.
I provide the full story in today's Wall Street Journal. Please give it a read.
VIDEOS: The University of California System spearheaded a special side-door hiring scheme for scholars committed to diversity.
But at UC Riverside, multiple professors raised serious concerns about the model—namely, that it pushes an ideological agenda. 🧵🧵🧵
In 2023, Douglas Haynes, a UC System vice provost, appeared on aUC Riverside panel on the President's Postdoctoral Fellowship Program.
In Q&A, several professors raised the issue. “What I wonder about is whether there is an ideological litmus test," said Steven Brint.
Philosopher John Fisher followed up more forcefully.
“There are rules that are written down and there are unwritten rules, and it seems to me that one of the unwritten rules is an ideological litmus test."
NEW: The University of California's "President’s Postdoctoral Fellowship Program" serves as a faculty hiring model for universities around the country.
It also creates big problems for academic freedom, and professors have increasingly sounded the alarm. 🧵
David Turner is an assistant professor in UCLA’s school of public affairs.
In his spare time, Turner does community activism, having co-founded the “Police-Free LAUSD Coalition,” a group that calls for wholesale police abolition.
That activism shows up in Turner's scholarship.
In an article for Abolition: A Journal of Insurgent Politics, for example, Turner praises Black Lives Matter student activists for the way they reject capitalism and adopt a “Black queer feminist lens.”
1/ UC Davis is still investigating Jemma Decristo for these ⬇️⬇️ comments.
My reporting shows: UC Davis recruited Decristo through a postdoc program that gives special favor to scholar-activists.
Here are a few other beneficiaries of the vast scholar-activist pipeline. 🧵🧵🧵
2/ Here’s how it works: these fellows are 1) hired through a less-competitive process focused on diversity and then 2) heavily favored for a tenure-track jobs at the conclusion of the postdocs.
Its a side door into the faculty lounge—very convenient for admin pushing an agenda.
3/ Kyshia Henderson examines “how White Americans ignore, dismiss, and distort historical truths in ways that promote white supremacy.”
Hired at the University of Chicago through the Provost’s Postdoctoral Fellowship which promises all recipients a tenure-track job.
NEW: Days after the 10/7 Hama attack, UC Davis professor Jemma Decristo posted threateningly (⬇️⬇️) about "zionist journalists."
It rightly sparked outrage. But an even bigger story is how Decristo was recruited to a tenure-track job at UC Davis in the first place 🧵
Today I’m introducing a series of investigations (@CityJournal) on the scholar-activist pipeline.
For years, universities, private foundations, and federal agencies have furnished a well-funded career pathway for scholar who hold an activist vision for higher education.
@CityJournal When Decristo expressed sympathy for overt violence, UC Davis’s chancellor publicly condemned the comments—saying they were inconsistent with the university's commitment to social justice.
But ironically, Decristo was hired precisely because of that commitment.
NEW: Louis Galarowicz (@nasorg) and I have acquired a trove of records from University of Colorado, Boulder, that show how the entire university coordinated to advance a system of brazen race-based hiring.
The receipts are pretty astonishing... 🧵
@NASorg We acquired the approved/successful proposals for the university's large-scale diversity hiring program. Here are a few examples:
The College of Engineering & Applied Sciences said its cluster hire had “the goal of doubling our underrepresented faculty in the college.”
@NASorg Another example:
The Renewable And Sustainable Energy Institute proposed a specific candidate—who it noted was “an outstanding BIPOC scholar” who would increase the program’s “domestic Faculty of Color...”
NEW: According to emails I've acquired via records request, Dana Renga, Ohio State's Dean of Arts and Humanities, enthusiastically approved a faculty search committee report that boasted about blatant race-based discrimination.
🧵🧵🧵
As I’ve previously reported, an OSU search committee, hiring a professor of “black France,” stated it was "essential" to hire a “visible minority.”
“We thus chose three Black candidates” for on campus interviews, the report states.
Remarkably, the emails I acquired show that Renga—who was responsible for approving the report—read it closely enough to catch a minor detail.
The committee didn’t list when all of its members attended the mandatory inclusive hiring training.