John Sailer Profile picture
Jul 6 8 tweets 4 min read Read on X
SCOOP: The NIH is giving $250m to universities to hire medical scientists who show “an interest in DEI.”

The NIH says the program doesn't “discriminate against any group.” Public records tell a different story.

As one email put it, “I don’t want to hire white men for sure." Image
The NIH FIRST program funds “cluster hiring” at universities and med schools around the country.

The program follows a popular model, reasoning that universities would hire minorities as a byproduct of heavily weighing DEI statements. On paper it bars racial preferences. Image
But in grant proposals, for projects funded by the NIH, universities repeatedly and openly state they'll restrict who they hire on the basis of race.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center promises to hire 18-20 "Black, Latinx, American Indian, and Pacific Islander" scientists. Image
Emails show how this worked in practice.

At the University of New Mexico, the program gave each underrepresented minority a "second look" in the search process.

In one email, faculty ask whether a south Asian job finalist was a "second look" candidate. Image
He didn't count. So they eliminated him. Noting that the department was "really low on women."


Image
Image
Image
Image
Other emails show search committees closely scrutinizing the race and sex of job candidates.
Image
Image
At one point, an NIH program official stated that race candidates should have no bearing on hiring.

This confused the grant recipients, who speculated that maybe the official "has" to say it that way, noting that she’d hinted at this before over zoom. Image
The records raise serious questions about the NIH FIRST program. And about the use of diversity statements in faculty hiring. Lawmakers should investigate both.

I provide the full story in today's Wall Street Journal. Please give it a read.

wsj.com/articles/how-d…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Sailer

John Sailer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnDSailer

Dec 6
I talk to a lot of professors who hesitate to publicly push back against institutional madness.

It makes sense. Universities can make their lives miserable.

But two recent examples should inspire dissenters. Faculty who take a stand hold more card than one might think...

🧵🧵
Yesterday, a University of Michigan physics professor called out the president and board of regents — directly, in a public setting — for supporting what he described as blatantly discriminatory programs.

A truly remarkable statement.

That brings to mind an episode from the University of Washington.

In the summer, a professor stood up at a meeting and—while others tried to shout her down—directly confronted several administrators over allegedly wide-spread illegal hiring.

Read 6 tweets
Dec 4
At the University of Michigan, a large-scale hiring program only recruits scholars who show a “commitment to DEI.”

In practice, its a career pipeline program for scholars in activist disciplines—like “trans of color epistemologies” and “queer of color critique."

🧵🧵🧵 Image
Image
Image
Image
After the New York Times published on Michigan’s DEI bureaucracy, the university scrubbed (❗️❗️) the Collegiate Fellows Program directory from its webpage.

But I saved archived links.

Here’s what the much-celebrated initiative looks like in practice.
1⃣ A gender studies professor hired through the program studies how “transgender Latinas are racialized and sexualized in sexual economies of labor and the US nation more broadly.” Image
Read 26 tweets
Dec 1
At the NIH, the Distinguished Scholars Program hires scientists who show a “commitment to diversity, equity, and inclusion.”

Through a public records request, I’ve acquired redacted NIH hiring documents that show what this criterion looks like in practice.

🧵 Image
Note, the NIH's former chief DEI officer emphasized that this program does not limit hiring based on race or sex—because, as she puts it below, “legally we cannot.”

Instead, it purports to boost diversity by proxy, hiring scientists who value DEI.

But...
...the records I acquired show—first of all—that NIH applicant reviewers repeatedly highlight gender and minority status.

Here's an example, in the section soliciting positive and negative comments on the potential NIH scientists. Image
Read 21 tweets
Nov 26
NEW: The University of Michigan has hired over 50 professors via initiatives led by its chief diversity officer, Tabbye Chavous.

In records I've acquired, U-M boasted that, for these hires, diversity statements serve as a near-perfect proxy for racial preferences. Image
The University of Michigan Board of Regents may soon ditch DEI. In the unfolding drama, Chavous plays a central role. Her vision for higher education hangs in the balance.

In my latest, I unpack the FOIAed record, which sheds light on that vision.

city-journal.org/article/univer…Image
I’ve acquired U-M's proposal for the “Michigan Program for Advancing Cultural Transformation” (M-PACT), a DEI-hiring initiative for scientists.

M-PACT involves serious money—$63M from U-M and $15M from the NIH—adopting hiring practices designed by Chavous. Image
Read 15 tweets
Nov 25
NEW FOIA DOCUMENTS: a UW professor discusses her department's policy of "prioritizing DEI" in the hiring process. This, she says, is "operationalized as focusing on increasing hiring of URM candidates." Image
Earlier in that thread, when discussing how to rank candidates, search committee members ask whether the department has a policy on BIPOC candidates, like it does on URMs. Image
In a separate email, a committee member points out that "DEI contributions" are supposed to be their "top priority."

"This is what led to my surprise that DEI didn't seem to be the highest rated criterion in the committee's evaluation of candidates." Image
Read 4 tweets
Nov 21
NEW: The University of Michigan Board of Regents has asked its president for a plan "to defund or restructure" the Office of Diversity, Equity, & Inclusion—according to the UM faculty senate chair.

In an email, the chair says the board could vote on the plan early next month! Image
The email, which was addressed to the faculty senate, calls on faculty to defend DEI at an institution that has sunk millions into a sprawling social justice bureaucracy.

It also quickly blames and dismisses @nickconfessore's recent NYT piece ("a tendentious attack"). Image
The email also states that several regents spoke with Confessore, and that they "actively engaged the NY Times journalist" by "offering perspectives, information and contacts in ways that helped set up the articles biased framework and conclusion."Image
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(