John Sailer Profile picture
Jul 6, 2024 8 tweets 4 min read Read on X
SCOOP: The NIH is giving $250m to universities to hire medical scientists who show “an interest in DEI.”

The NIH says the program doesn't “discriminate against any group.” Public records tell a different story.

As one email put it, “I don’t want to hire white men for sure." Image
The NIH FIRST program funds “cluster hiring” at universities and med schools around the country.

The program follows a popular model, reasoning that universities would hire minorities as a byproduct of heavily weighing DEI statements. On paper it bars racial preferences. Image
But in grant proposals, for projects funded by the NIH, universities repeatedly and openly state they'll restrict who they hire on the basis of race.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center promises to hire 18-20 "Black, Latinx, American Indian, and Pacific Islander" scientists. Image
Emails show how this worked in practice.

At the University of New Mexico, the program gave each underrepresented minority a "second look" in the search process.

In one email, faculty ask whether a south Asian job finalist was a "second look" candidate. Image
He didn't count. So they eliminated him. Noting that the department was "really low on women."


Image
Image
Image
Image
Other emails show search committees closely scrutinizing the race and sex of job candidates.
Image
Image
At one point, an NIH program official stated that race candidates should have no bearing on hiring.

This confused the grant recipients, who speculated that maybe the official "has" to say it that way, noting that she’d hinted at this before over zoom. Image
The records raise serious questions about the NIH FIRST program. And about the use of diversity statements in faculty hiring. Lawmakers should investigate both.

I provide the full story in today's Wall Street Journal. Please give it a read.

wsj.com/articles/how-d…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Sailer

John Sailer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnDSailer

Nov 11
NEW: During one hiring cycle at Ohio State, 60% of new arts and humanities faculty jobs fell in the “DEI” category, according to emails I obtained.

This was after OSU announced it would hire “100 underrepresented and BIPOC hires in all fields of scholarship.”

🧵on my latest. Image
In 2021, Ohio State’s then-president Kristina Johnson announced an initiative to hire 50 scholars focused on “social equity” and 100 “underrepresented and BIPOC” hires in all disciplines.

Documents I’ve acquired, reported in @CityJournal, shed light on how that played out. Image
@CityJournal The documents reveal how administrators were keeping tabs on the hiring spree.

In November 2022, an OSU diversity dean said over email that she wanted to meet with the finalists for a DEI-focused faculty job: professor of “indigenous knowledges.” Image
Read 18 tweets
Aug 5
Last week, the DOJ released guidance for federal funding recipients.

The memo—which clarifies how nondiscrimination law should be applied—is a huge development for universities. A lot of their worst policies are looking more fragile than ever. 🧵 Image
2/ The DOJ specifically highlights the use of racial proxies. Hiring on the basis of "cultural competence" or using diversity statements is unlawful if the purpose is to give an advantage to specific racial groups.

This is an even bigger deal than it might seem. Image
3/ Universities often take on large-scale hiring programs that select for an emphasis on "equity."

Inevitably the programs recruit ideologues. More importantly, this criteria is justified because it's seen as a way to favor minorities. It's right there in their own documents ⬇️ Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Jul 29
NEW: George Mason University's largest college required every faculty hiring committee to carefully document how it prioritized diversity.

Through FOIA, I’ve acquired dozens of these reports. The records are eye opening…🧵 Image
For several years, these inclusive search plans were required for hiring in the College of Humanities and Social Sciences.

One committee openly stated that it discussed “diversity”—which included “demographic diversity”—as a part of candidates' strengths/weaknesses. Image
Meanwhile two other search committees explained how they had crafted their job advertisements to signal their desire to “make a diversity hire.” Image
Image
Read 7 tweets
Jul 18
NEW: Around the country, college deans monitor finalist slates, shortlists, and applicant pools for faculty jobs. If a list isn't "diverse," a search can be outright cancelled.

I've acquired a trove of records that show who bankrolled this practice: the federal government.

🧵 Image
As I’ve previously reported, these checkpoints give administrators diversity-based veto power in hiring (see ⬇️⬇️⬇️ for examples).

But the practice didn’t emerge organically. At many universities, it was adopted as direct result of National Science Foundation (NSF) funding. Image
Image
Image
Image
Here’s what those grants look like.

In 2003, Case Western Reserve University received one of the early NSF ADVANCE grants ($3.5 million).

As a part of the grant, “deans could send a list back to the department if it did not reflect the diversity of the national pool.” Image
Read 12 tweets
Jul 7
NEW: Universities across the U.S. have embraced diversity checkpoints in faculty hiring.

Administrators monitor the demographics of applicants throughout the process, with consequences for searches that don't "pass muster"—according to a trove of records I've obtained.

🧵 Image
In one email—acquired via a records request—UT Austin professor Carma Gorman asked diversity-dean John Yancey whether her search committee’s pool was sufficiently diverse to advance.

The dean said yes, but if the numbers dropped “then things don’t look good anymore.” Image
Image
At the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign (UIUC), the Human Resources director would send weekly “diversity of the pool reports,” which would continue up to the selection of finalists.

If the makeup was deemed “insufficient,” more administrators would get involved. Image
Read 14 tweets
Jun 30
DOCUMENTS: At Cornell, search committees that were hiring biomedical scientists had to pass four "checkpoints" to make sure their pools were "sufficiently diverse."

"That certainly looks like a Title VII violation," one legal expert told me when discussing the program.

🧵 Image
In 2021, Cornell received a $16 million NIH grant for the Cornell FIRST hiring program—aiming, in the proposal’s words, to "increase the number of minoritized faculty" at Cornell and beyond.

I acquired a trove of documents that show how this played out. Image
According to a proposal and set of progress reports, the program's leadership team screened applicants at four separate stages—the initial pool, longlist, shortlist, and finalist slate—to ensure “as diverse a pool as possible.” Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(