John Sailer Profile picture
Jul 6 8 tweets 4 min read Read on X
SCOOP: The NIH is giving $250m to universities to hire medical scientists who show “an interest in DEI.”

The NIH says the program doesn't “discriminate against any group.” Public records tell a different story.

As one email put it, “I don’t want to hire white men for sure." Image
The NIH FIRST program funds “cluster hiring” at universities and med schools around the country.

The program follows a popular model, reasoning that universities would hire minorities as a byproduct of heavily weighing DEI statements. On paper it bars racial preferences. Image
But in grant proposals, for projects funded by the NIH, universities repeatedly and openly state they'll restrict who they hire on the basis of race.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center promises to hire 18-20 "Black, Latinx, American Indian, and Pacific Islander" scientists. Image
Emails show how this worked in practice.

At the University of New Mexico, the program gave each underrepresented minority a "second look" in the search process.

In one email, faculty ask whether a south Asian job finalist was a "second look" candidate. Image
He didn't count. So they eliminated him. Noting that the department was "really low on women."


Image
Image
Image
Image
Other emails show search committees closely scrutinizing the race and sex of job candidates.
Image
Image
At one point, an NIH program official stated that race candidates should have no bearing on hiring.

This confused the grant recipients, who speculated that maybe the official "has" to say it that way, noting that she’d hinted at this before over zoom. Image
The records raise serious questions about the NIH FIRST program. And about the use of diversity statements in faculty hiring. Lawmakers should investigate both.

I provide the full story in today's Wall Street Journal. Please give it a read.

wsj.com/articles/how-d…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Sailer

John Sailer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @JohnDSailer

May 29
NEW: For hiring new professors, Columbia University recommends valuing “contributions to DEI” on par with “research.”

The sample evaluation tool also weighs DEI more highly than teaching.

That’s an especially wild default given how Columbia defines “contributions to DEI"... 🧵Image
Columbia provides an in-depth rubric for assessing DEI credentials. Which, of course, is pretty important if DEI might carry the same weight as research.

Take a look. The rubric gives a low score to candidates who are skeptical of racially-segregated “affinity groups.” Image
Here’s the rest of the Columbia rubric.

It rewards things like speaking at workshops “aimed at increasing others’ understanding of diversity, equity, and inclusion.”
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
May 28
Do universities discriminate against white candidates? Yes. Especially when hiring professors focused on identity/social justice.

These positions give universities plausible deniability for race-based hiring, which is common in academia.

I have receipts. 🧵 Image
It’s worth remembering the academic job market’s total saturation in positions focused on race, identity, and social justice.

Things like "indigenous Siberian studies" and classics with a focus on "race, racism, and Greek & Roman studies."

Image
Image
Image
This has entirely skewed certain disciplines. A grad student looking at a field like, say, German studies will be able to put two and two together.

There are hardly any jobs out there, and the jobs that are out there tend to fit a specific theme.

Read 11 tweets
May 23
NEW: Yale University’s department of molecular biophysics and biochemistry requires all job applicants to submit a DEI statement.

Here's the evaluation rubric, which shows the exhaustive DEI criteria for assessing any scientist hoping to work in the Yale department. Image
It's a remarkable document, which puts a thumb on the scale for progressive sensibilities.

Scientists get points for understanding the “challenges faced by underrepresented minorities”—likely to favor those fluent in the language of "microaggressions" and "implicit bias." Image
This DEI litmus test—or as some might say, loyalty pledge—evidently carries serious weight.

A presentation on the department’s hiring protocols declares that hiring committees should put “DEI at the center of every decision.”
Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
May 19
The Washington Post Editorial Board calls for the end of DEI statements in faculty hiring.

It argues that the policy has led in practice to "ideological policing." That's a big deal—focusing on how the policy plays out in real life, not in some imagined best-case scenario. Image
In practice the ideological policing is impossible to deny. Here are just a few examples of how "DEI contributions" are evaluated, as shown by public records.

Here’s a wild example: At Texas Tech, a DEI evaluation of biology job candidates show one being penalized for not properly describing the difference between equality and equity.Image
Another job candidate was rewarded in their DEI report for giving a “land acknowledgement” at the beginning of their job talk. Image
Read 4 tweets
Mar 13
The NIH funds DEI-related hiring in the biomedical sciences through multi-million dollar grants to universities around the county.

I've acquired hundreds of records related to this program—which I discuss in-depth in today's WSJ. A thread to highlight a few of those records. /1 Image
NIH FIRST funds DEI "cluster hiring" at universities and med schools. A core requirement of the program is that every scientist hired submit a “diversity statement,” an increasingly controversial policy.

What does this look like in practice? The records speak for themselves. /2 Image
Cornell University’s grant proposal describing how it will evaluate its hard-science job candidates: “Note that the statement on contribution to diversity will receive significant weight in the evaluation.” /3Image
Read 11 tweets
Jan 26
The Utah Senate just passed a bill that in effect ends DEI in state universities. Now's probably a good time to recall what DEI has actually looked like in the state, especially since outlets like the Salt Lake Tribune have tried their best to “debunk” the major criticism.

The most salient example comes from the University of Utah’s School of Medicine—and its response to a group called White Coats 4 Black Lives.
In 2020, the University of Utah School of Medicine effectively adopted a DEI plan called for and created by White Coats 4 Black Lives (WC4BL).

WC4BL is a radical student activist organization. I use the word "radical" sparingly but it’s undeniable here. The organization — which boasts chapters at about 70 medical schools — calls for defunding the police, abolishing prisons, and an identitarian form of socialism. But really, it’s best to hear the organization in its own words.

The fist page of its Vision and Values statement for example asserts that “dominant medical practice in the United States has been built on the dehumanization and exploitation of Black people.”Image
WC4BL asserts that anti-racism requires “dismantling fatphobia,” “Black queer feminist praxis,” “the redistribution of power and resources (including reparations.”

The group asserts that white supremacy is a global colonialist project and calls for resistance against “Israeli Apartheid." That “the destruction of racial hierarchy, created for the purpose of exploitation, whiteness, and white supremacy, requires dismantling racial capitalism altogether.”

It also argues that policing originated from slave patrols and for the removal of police from hospitals.

It instructs the readers that “Cisheteropatriachy” is a European invention “intimately connected to colonialism and white supremacy,” and decries requiring a therapist letter for trans surgeries.Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(