🧵A Thread on the US’ AIM-174B and China’s YJ-12 Carrier Killer Cruise Missile: A Dance of the Vampires with Chinese Characteristics. 1/17
In light of recent events with the unveiling of the US’s new AIM-174B, let’s discuss the threat it’s mostly meant to counter, the YJ-12. 2/17
In 1995-1996, the US’s display of power during the Third Taiwan Strait Crisis, sending both the USS Independence and USS Nimitz carriers, profoundly shocked the PRC’s leadership. This strengthened the Chinese ambition to develop weapons powerful enough to threaten US CSGs. 3/17
Requirements were drafted for a supersonic missile that would take on US carriers and their escorts. It would complement the medium range sea skimming subsonic YJ-83, not be survivable enough on its own to break through the Aegis Combat System. 4/17
China most likely relied on the Russian supersonic SS-N-22 Sunburn, in use aboard their Sovremenny destroyers, to inform their design decisions. Both uses the same ramjet propulsion system, fed by 4 flank air intake and a double set of control surfaces in an X layout. 5/17
The ramjet uses an integral rocket booster, the ramjet chamber is used to host fuel boosting the missile to speeds allowing ramjet operations accelerating up to its more efficient speeds of Mach 3 to 4. At these speeds its gives ~30s reaction times past the radar horizon. 6/17
The missile is guided by an Inertial Navigation System with mid-course corrections via Beidou satellite link, and is fitted with an active radar in its nose cone for terminal guidance. Violent high Gs terminal maneuvers are used to increase terminal survivability. 7/17
With a capable ISR network this satellite link could allow China to target missiles beyond the radar range of the firing platform to make full use of the missile long range and high speed, similarly to the US’s Collaborative Engagement Capability (CEC). 8/17
The fully supersonic flight profile of the YJ-12 complements the PRC’s missile arsenal with the fully subsonic YJ-83 and the mostly subsonic but supersonic in final phase YJ-18, range wise it also fits in between the YJ-83’s ~180 and the the YJ-18’s ~400 ish km. 9/17
The most strategically important version is the classic YJ-12 air launched from the JH-7A but mostly from the H-6J, extending its range up to 1900km including the bomber’s ferry and its 400+km range when fired at altitude. 10/17
The bomber’s long range and high flexibility combined with the missile’s relatively low flying flight profile at high speeds creates tactical challenges for US planners compared to the faster but more predictable and less flexible ballistic missiles. 11/17
Shooting down the archers before they fire their arrows is the best counter to these attacks. The recent sighting of operational AIM-174Bs aboard the USS Carl Vinson is a sign that the Navy is returning to these Cold War tactics. @heatloss1986 12/17
The AIM-174Brs long range, important payload and high definition radar makes it the ideal long-range bomber killer, likely lacking the end game kinematics it would need to go after more nimble fighters. A worthy (and superior) heir to the AIM-54 Phoenix. 13/17
In addition, the YJ-12A can be launched from naval surface units via deck canisters, but the PLA rarely uses it as it is 3x heavier than the standard YJ-83 and is not used in VLS unlike the YJ-18. The DDG-167 Shenzhen notably carries 16. 14/17
Alongside the air-launched version, the other main use of the missile is in the Coastal Defense Missile force (CDMF). Here the road mobile YJ-12B gradually replaces the YJ-62 since 2018. Being ground launched its range is slightly reduced to ~300km. 15/17
Mainland batteries enforce the PRC’s control of its shores and can threaten the Taiwanese navy but are too far to be of any relevant use against the US, whereas the units deployed in the South China Sea pose a tactical challenge in the region. 16/17
The YJ-12 fits perfectly within the PRC’s anti-ship missile arsenal, and alongside with the H-6J it is giving the US the challenge of a Dance of the Vampires with Chinese characteristics, however as recent event have showed never count the US out of the race. 17/17
The cool kids list @Defence_IDA @John_A_Ridge @Doha104p3 @the_engi_nerd @VLO225 @MassiasThanos @StrategicTrends @AirPowerNEW1 @TheKimulation @kemal_115 @GrangerE04117 @stoa1984
Also i don’t get why this table from CIMSEC lists the YJ-12 as partially supersonic in the terminal phase. It has a ramjet it literally has to be supersonic for most of the flight ???
@TheKimulation The twitter interactions I yearn for, the more you know
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵 Thread on France's Ramjet Powered Air-Launched Nuke That May Protect Europe🇪🇺: The ASMPA-R. 1/22
Historically France's deterrence relied on the classic triad of Sea (SLBM), Ground (SRBM/IRBM) and Air with the AN-11 and AN-22, analogous to the US' B61/83. 2/22
However, rapid development of SAM technology in the 70s threatened the use of gravity bombs, prompting the French Air Force to look for a stand-off alternative. 3/22
The Dragon Eye: Thread On Chinese Destroyers’ Type 346 AESA Radar. 1/17
Being the most important sensor on China’s first rank destroyers, equivalent to the US Navy’s SPY-1/6s, understanding the “Dragon Eye” is critical to correctly evaluate the capabilities of the Chinese navy. 2/17
The development story of the Type 346 is unique in how much we know thanks to the wealth of information shared in 2016 online by one of its key architects who emigrated to North America. It must still be taken cautiously but seems very likely credible information. 3/17
Drones and the Future of Warfare: Remembering the Lessons of the Jeune Ecole.
A Thread to better understand the issues surrounding the idea that drones are changing warfare, using the lessons learnt from the French Jeune Ecole. 1/15
Since the War in Ukraine of 2022, and to some extend the Nagorno-Karabakh War of 2020, there has been prolific debates on how drones from the TB-2 to the FPV are changing warfare, making expensive legacy systems like tanks, jets or air-defense now obsolete. 2/15
These debates mirror the raging debates that took the French navy by storm in the end of the 19th century. Looking back at these debates gives us the benefit of hindsight and allows us not to repeat the same mistakes again. 3/15
Thread on the S-300P / S-400 Family: Part 5 Transporter Erector Launchers.
With its many iterations over the decades, the S-300P saw equally as many different TELs designs. From towed, self-propelled and connected ones, this thread will review the main evolutions. 1/11
A first overall comment is that S-300P TELs differ significantly from previous Soviet TELs with fully enclosed missile cannisters and cold-launched ejection. The disposition allowed for easier missiles handling, maintenance and 360° launch capability. 2/11
The initial TEL was the 5P851, a stop gap measure just like the system it equipped with, the S-300PT. Towed by a KrAZ-258 tractor, the trailer launcher can be deployed on an unprepared ground area with a slope of no more than 4º in the horizontal plane. 3/11
Thread on the S-300P / S-400 Family: Part 4 Target Engagement Radar. 1/14
As we saw in the previous part, in the S-300P systems threats are detected by the long-range radars transferring the tracking data to lower level dedicated engagement radar at the battery level. 2/14
These radars use PESA arrays to combine in a single platform target tracking, missile tracking, and depending on missile command types, sending information to guide the missile to its target. TThese radars usually use narrower band waves, typically X band or adjacent. 3/14
Thread on the S-300P / S-400 Family: Part 3 Long Range Radars. 1/16
Like older Soviet SAMs using the P-12/14/15/18s, the S-300P uses dedicated long range early detection radars. Due to their high price (command post + RLO was roughly the price of a full battery), they were only at the brigade/regiment level directing 2-6 batteries. 2/16
To reach long ranges these radars use larger band waves, making them unable to direct tracking and threat engagement. The central command post relays relevant information down to the dedicated individual engagement radars at the battery level to perform the engagement. 3/16