Thread by @JozsefPapp_

New: Judge Rachel Krause has denied Young Thug's motion asking her to recuse herself from hearing the motion to recuse Judge Ural Glanville, as well as, Deamonte Kendrick's motion for all Fulton judges to recuse from hearing the motion to recuse Glanville. @ajc #YSL #YoungThug

@ajc In her order regarding Young Thug's motion, Krause notes that "The Georgia Supreme Court has held that the mere fact of a campaign contribution to a judge - even from a party to the case - does not warrant recusal where the contribution was not exceptionally large."

@ajc Here is the rest of the order issued on Young Thug's motion to recuse Krause based on Glanville contributing $2,000 to her re-election campaign. drive.google.com/file/d/1chMRgt…

@ajc On Kendrick's motion, Krause notes that a motion to recuse requires three criteria: Must be timely, accompanied by an affidavit stating the facts and reasons that bias exists and recusal is necessary.

Krause said Kendrick's motion did not include an affidavit so it's denied.

@ajc "Judge Glanville is neither a party nor counsel in this criminal prosecution, nor is this a mandamus action, and Defendant Kendrick cannot make it so by filing a recusal motion," Krause wrote in the order denying Kendrick's motion to disqualify all Fulton judges.