There is no broader evidence that the low reads of measured inflation in May marked a significant turning point.
Looking across a range of other measures, inflation looks pretty stable for the last year and elevated compared to pre-covid levels and the Fed's mandate.
Thread.
Small biz are a big part of the economy and the NFIB *actual* price changes in recent months is a good indication small biz pricing. Net price increases have come down, but still are clearly higher than pre-covid and nearly all of the pre-covid period.
If there was a significant inflection in inflation downward, you'd expect to see it in timely consumer expectations. CEBRA inferred inflation expectations look pretty stable and well above the levels seen before the inflation shock in '22.
Fed consumer inflation expectations have also remained stable in recent months, a touch above pre-covid levels and around 3%.
Michigan 1yr inflation expectations have also been pretty stable around 3% this year. No signs of a material transition lower.
ISM has issues, but is another triangulation on the read on how prices are evolving that generally captured the up and down of the recent inflation spike. Pretty stable over the last year or so.
Manufactured goods has been a big source of disinflation lately, though not seeing a meaningful shift to a lower level in the ISM prices paid. Choppy and recent numbers have ticked down, but still higher than all of '23.
Notable that despite the relatively soft print, we haven't seen much in the way of shifts in analysts expectations for '24 inflation (CPI), which continue to hold steady at highs and above 3%.
Market based measures of inflation have also remained relatively stable. 5yr break-evens have continued to trade in a narrow range and above pre-covid levels.
Also worth noting that some of the disinflationary pressure seen in oil prices in May has largely reverted and is running now in line with the average of the last year or so. So that input possibly dragging down traded inflation measures no longer in place.
@truflation is main outlier among the broader set of data. Its vacillated wildly from well above 3% to a recent low of 1.8% - though May was kinda flat. Seems unreliable.
Lots of people will post this saying inflation is dead, but I'd suggest taking a broader perspective above.
While measured inflation is important for policymakers, it has all sorts of randomness to any one month's measure so its important to look holistically at all of the available data to triangulate whether the low reading in May is likely part of a broader shift lower.
So far there are few indications of such a shift scanning across a wide range of measures. Underlying inflation looks to be pretty stable and above levels seen in the pre-covid period. And largely has been flat for roughly a year now.
Anyone thinking they have an edge in predicting the 1 month core CPI data is fooling themselves - there is just too much noise in the measurement. And as a result no one (including the Fed!) should read too much into that datapoint either.
As NFIB shows, the biggest problems today remain inflation and labor quality.
Regardless of measured inflation or UE, main street doesn't think inflation is beat or that labor markets have loosened materially lately. That should give the Fed real concerns about easing now.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Short stocks *and* bonds is likely better ahead than simply short stocks on their own.
In an environment where stocks are at all close to earnings expectations, bonds will underperform. And where earnings disappoint, the bond rally wont be enough to cover stock losses.
Thread.
The challenge today is just how strong the "soft landing" dynamic is currently priced:
* Equities at 21x 12m forward earnings expected to grow 30% from the stable level the last couple years.
* The Fed priced to cut 150bps thru end of '25
* Zero term premium in bonds.
In order for both stocks *and* bonds to rally further, these outcomes have to end up being even further than what is currently priced in. So:
* >30% earnings growth in the next 18m.
* >150bps of cuts by the Fed.
* Negative term-premium in US bonds
US stocks experiencing a surge in earnings *expectations* not actual earnings.
Investors are set up for disappointment ahead.
Thread.
12m forward EPS est have surged to $260 (blend '24/'25), while actual earnings have been *flat* around $225 for ~2yrs.
Plus paying 21x fwd, levels only seen in the tech bubble at these bond yields.
Many market commentators who are bullish on stocks will note just how strong the 12m forward earnings are and how those have been growing in recent months, now up 12% on a y/y basis, in notable contrast to more timely economic data which has been flat (or weakening).
The labor market remains secularly tight, is still growing, but slowing relative to the last couple years, all while wage growth remains elevated.
Ahead of today's report, a scan through the data reported so far this month for a sense of what's likely to come. Thread.
ADP isn't a good predictor of NFP, but it is real data from the biggest payroll processor in the US. While the 150k number was a tad below expectations, and below the pace in '22 & '23, its largely been stable since last Aug.
Withheld taxes are another good *actual* read on employment (since it gets paid when people are employed) and in the short-term is driven more by net hiring than wage growth. It suggests a roughly normal pace of employment expansion. h/t @AndreasSteno
The Eurozone still has an inflation problem and today's data kept those concerns firmly in place.
While there has been progress on energy and manufactured goods prices, services inflation remains far too high and wont come down with UE at secular lows driving wage growth >5%.
If you squint at the sequential data, core services inflation has been running around 5% so far this year following the dip late last year. h/t @atalaveraEcon who was quick with the charts this morning.
In any advanced services-driven economy inflation in services is largely the result of nominal wage growth. And that nominal wage growth is typically a function of the tightness of labor markets.
In the Eurozone labor markets are as tight as they've been since the bloc start.
The Stronger for Longer outlook nailed the macro environment in 1H24, but macro dynamics and market pricing have clearly shifted.
2H24 will likely will be dominated by disappointment from a Growing but Slowing economy.
What it means for the economy and assets ahead. Thread.
Coming into '24, expectations of US growth were soft, and the resulting upward shift in expectations helped support stocks and put a drag on bonds and short rates pricing in rapid cuts.
But now, expectations for '24 growth are at 2.4%, which means ~3% in 2Q-4Q given 1Q GDP.
Further expectations of earnings growth at the S&P500 level are now for 17% y/y gains by 4Q24.
That's a pretty notable pickup in contrast to the relatively flat earnings over the previous 7 quarters and high in context of an economy growing at 5-6% nominal at best.