A complaint was lodged against me by a lecturer in Trinity as per a tweet of mine in May that I’ve long since deleted (to my knowledge because I can’t find it). This lecturer blocked me despite us never interacting. Not once.
He said in the complaint that this is because ‘I try my best to steer clear of “Zionists” online’.
The complaint centres around the fact that I said in my tweet that he had endorsed October 7th.
Also the fact that I said this was a ‘moral depravity’ and that the student who informed me of this was also appalled at this ‘moral depravity’.
The ‘endorsement’ I spoke of was retweeting the tweet below. I have cut off the OP and the lecturer’s name showing he retweeted it.
I put it to the public here whether retweeting ‘resistance is the right of occupied people’ on the day a massacre occurred is or isn’t an endorsement of said massacre.
The lecturer said that ‘the tweets appear to be part of an online bullying against me…
…that supporters of Israel have been engaging in’.
I have publicly stated in a published article I do not identity as ‘pro Israel’ because that implies being ‘anti’ Palestinian, which I categorically am not.
My only purpose in my advocacy is combatting antisemitism.
The tweet he retweeted is under the auspices of this given it was in reference to the most deadly single-day massacre of Jews since the Shoah.
I never imagined my advocacy would result in the platform I currently have. Ever.
I am an introverted PhD student in sign linguistics.
Every PhD student/graduate knows how tough undertaking a PhD is at the best of times.
The strain of this has been infinitely multiplied as I have been unintentionally thrust into an unplanned advocacy role in the public domain.
One I feel morally compelled to continue doing.
This advocacy has resulted in torrents of abuse and harassment directed at me.
Notably, as a young woman, this has included an incredible amount of sexual harassment and abuse in my comments and DMs: the vast majority of which I do not publicise and just privately deal with.
I am disillusioned by Trinity-the college I once loved-and how it has enabled antisemitism to become normalised into campus.
I am also disillusioned and frankly heartbroken by the people with whom I have worked and studied for the last decade.
They know me and my intentions.
They know I am introverted and unassuming. I would be confident in saying that they would regard me as kind.
But they have not supported me in the face of this abuse in the way that I have supported their causes. I spent two years working for nonprofit disability organisation.
My current area of study, which focuses on sign linguistics, is intended to be of practical benefit to the Deaf community.
In my professional pursuits I have focused on endeavours to try make the world a better place. Rather than choosing pursuits more financially lucrative.
Combatting hatred and discrimination, including antisemitism, is part of this same urge: trying to make the world a better place.
I have tried my utmost to listen to Palestinian perspectives and voices and have been clear about the need for a ceasefire and hostage release deal.
Because part of making the world a better place is fighting for Palestinian rights/safety.
But this cannot include callousness, derision, or ‘endorsement’ of a massacre. I don’t know how morality has been so skewed in academia that the lecturer who expresses such callousness…
is inverted as righteous, whereas the lowly student who calls this out is the villain in this scenario: engaging in ‘online bullying’.
I am deeply upset by this development.
I have never so much as failed an exam. I can’t believe such a complaint has been lodged against me.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I never comment on the disputed death toll of civilians in Gaza. It’s exceptionally dehumanising.
As an academic, I do feel compelled to speak out about the widespread unethical reporting that ‘The Lancet estimates’ that there could be 186,000+ future indirect deaths in Gaza.
I see a lot of people referring to the established biases of the authors, but that’s not uncommon regarding I/P and is of less significance to me.
What concerns me is that the ‘article’ being cited is a 1-page letter from the correspondence section, not a peer-reviewed article.
Every academic knows it’s wrong and irresponsible for reporters to claim that this is ‘according to the Lancet’: a highly reputable peer-reviewed journal.
This positions it as an authoritative, peer-reviewed piece of work rather than what it is: a 1-page correspondence letter.
One thing that I’ve had to reckon with over the past few months is the reality that a lot of people now dislike me.
I’m not talking about antisemites, this is a given.
I’m talking about people-notably in the media and academia-who I have no doubt find me intensely irritating.
People who knew me before all of this can attest to the fact that I am not a combative/disagreeable person by nature. Quite the opposite.
I have adopted the necessary measures to combat institutional bias and discrimination.
This does not come easily to me and it weighs heavy.
Both the implementation of these measures and the inevitable result of people disliking me has immense mental impact.
I was very content in my path in life before 7/10 studying sign linguistics. In a better world I would have been able to focus on this pursuit without enemies.
There are many excellent points in the piece but perhaps the standout is that Dostoevsky said that he has no innate bigotry against Jews, but hates them because of the things they do.
It is a really smart insight on the part of the author to point out how, just like Dostoevsky, people today are blind to their own bigotry because they feel as though it is a rational assessment based on news reports of factual events and things certain cohorts have done.
Secondly, I find the concept of competitive victimhood at two separate points in the piece very interesting.
The idea that Jewish victimhood must be negated and attacked in order for other nations to claim their own victimhood is one that I strongly believe has validity.
After WWII German women were raped en masse by Soviet troops. Hundreds of thousands of German women.
So many of these would have been Nazis and would have wanted my ancestor’s dead. But I would never deny what happened to them, I would never condone it, and I do have empathy.
I’ve been loathe to make this point because of the sickening Holocaust inversion and how morally depraved individuals delight in painting Jews as Nazis.
Nazi women are not comparable Israeli civilians.
My point is that women’s experiences of sexual violence are to be believed.
My point is that women’s experiences of sexual violence are to be condemned and empathised with. Universally. Without exception regardless of ethnicity, religion, or nationality.
It’s also damning to note that I have never seen anyone ever deny these experiences of Nazi women.
The people interviewed in the egregious @thetimes article have made a statement.
‘We are shocked and disappointed by the exploitation of our willingness to be interviewed and the attempt to use our expertise to give credence to the reporters' views.’
‘The article joins those who are guilty of the unacceptable politicisation of sexual violence. In this instance, the reporters' agenda replaced the professional and ethical commitment to presenting evidence accurately.’
@scribblercat and @gabrielle_sivia should issue an apology.
@scribblercat @gabrielle_sivia Other @thetimes writers who endorsed this ahistorical, biased, rape apologia piece should also be brought to account.
This project sought to improve access to judicial proceedings for deaf people.
Many of the cases in an Irish context for deaf people were Redress Board cases: these were cases whereby victims of institutional abuse in State-run schools sought compensation from the government.
In the deaf boys school there were numerous horrific instances of sexual abuse by Christian Brothers of deaf students. Many of these men in adulthood rightly sought compensation for this by the state.
There is no specific sign in Irish Sign Language for ‘molestation’ etc.