Henry Newman Profile picture
Jul 12 2 tweets 2 min read Read on X
In 2015, after the General Election, my then boss @michaelgove persuaded @David_Cameron & @George_Osborne of the importance of building a new, modern prison estate fit for the future

They embraced this agenda and the importance of prison reform (carried forward by successive Conservative Lord Chancellors inc @DLidington, @DavidGauke, @RobertBuckland, to @AlexChalkChelt)

Osborne used his Autumn Statement in November to announce a £1.3bn programme of prison building. He made quite a thing of it

The plan then was to build 9 new prisons while also closing and selling off older Victorian prisons. (Holloway was closed but broadly that part of the plan has still not been able to happen)

It is striking looking back now on the debate at the time of the 2015 Autumn Statement that the then Shadow Chancellor didn’t even seem to mention prisons in his response

It’s understandable that Labour will try to claim that they were ahead of this issue but go back and read the debates

They weren’t interested

hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2015-1…
The programme was expanded, rescoped and changed over the following years

There’s a useful explainer on the House of Commons library site for those interested

The Prison building programme is now a much bigger capital programme (also because the original plan was to help pay for the new estate by selling the old inner city locations which hasn’t happened to the extent which we planned)

Not enough of the new prison places have yet come online (an example of the challenges of running major projects in Government) but several thousand new places have

Other prisons are stuck in a planning mess

Which is why the Government’s recent reforms to the Nationally Significant Infrastructure Programme (introduced in the Levelling Up Act) are important

And why the last Government tried to reform nutrient neutrality which has stalled other prison expansion - this was opposed by the then Opposition

2/2

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Henry Newman

Henry Newman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HenryNewman

Mar 10, 2019
One of the strange things about the Brexit debate at the moment is the persistence of certain idées fixes about the PM's Brexit deal & its alternatives which are repeated by critics

Here's a Sunday afternoon mythbusting thread

👇

A)
Myth 1 - the deal isn't Brexit

This is often repeated; yet it is simply preposterous

Deal would take us out EU - no commissioner, no MEPs, no compulsory financial contributions (once exit bill settled), no voting rights, basically out EU legal order

It literally is Brexit

B)
Myth 2 - this deal would mean BRINO or staying in Single Market

Again this is total rubbish

The deal takes us definitively out the Single Market.

Even in the backstop, we would be free of practically all Single Market rules & could end free movement & diverge on services

C)
Read 22 tweets
Mar 6, 2019
A good Brexit deal is within grasp but MPs risk throwing that away in hope that by leaving with no deal, we might be able to improve our position

That's a HUGE brave gamble

It's time we took some deep breaths & went back to look at what's actually on the table

A thread 👇
Theresa May's Brexit deal remains the only actual deal on table

"Managed No Deal" or the Malthouse Compromise or whatever else are just ideas - not anything the EU has agreed to or shown any real interest in

I am yet to meet a single EU or European figure saying otherwise

2/
Our entire public narrative of the deal was shaped by the resignation of key ministers - above all @DominicRaab

I understand why Raab resigned

Theresa May cut him out of negotiations & did give him chance to push for the backstop exit mechanism he believed he could secure

3/
Read 24 tweets
Jan 24, 2019
Something quite important has shifted in last few days

Labour are now more explicitly admitting that they are not seeking real changes to the backstop but to the political declaration on our future relationship (rather than our divorce)

This matters A LOT. Here's why 👇

1/
DUP are so far pretty implacably opposed to Backstop in its current form as my colleague @dcshiels has documented in various ways ( eg 👇)

[Although there seems some nuance between comments by Geoffrey Donaldson vs @eastantrimmp or @NigelDoddsDUP]

2/

conservativehome.com/platform/2018/…
However if both main parties are now willing broadly to accept the Backstop in its current form, the possibility (perhaps never that likely) of the DUP choosing a Labour Brexit (whatever that is), to kill off the Backstop, over a Tory Brexit, seems less realistic

3/
Read 19 tweets
Jan 22, 2019
One of the things about working around politics now (especially on Brexit) is that I have friends on all sides of debate

@NickBoles has put forward a Norway Plus plan to try to deliver referendum result in a divided commons

A thread on why I respect it but think it's flawed 👇
1/ Although I think it's flawed I recognise Nick & Oliver put it forward in a genuine spirit of compromise and not to obfuscate the referendum

(It's depressing how other MPs less committed to Referendum are happy to trash this soft Brexit plan because they want to stop Brexit)
2/ In #January 2017, when I was first appointed at @OpenEurope, I was fan of leaving via Norway/EEA

I recall discussing it with @CER_Grant but also with many key Leavers

It would have been a sensible staging post & provided a better transition to work out our long term position
Read 21 tweets
Jan 13, 2019
On Tuesday @theresa_may will lose the vote, badly. Then what?

She'll make a statement that night & has 3 sitting days to introduce new motion. There are then 7 days to amend it

Thread on what comes next 👇

Subtitle - Brexit risks being killed by those who claim to ❤️ it most
2/ I don't think that we are close to a majority in favour of a second referendum. Luckily

Jeremy Corbyn remains luke warm & remain-backing Tories such as @NickyMorgan01 @nickherbertmp etc are still opposed

Many Labour MPs are in favour but far from all of them
3/ What about a Permanent Customs Union? This gets closer to Labour's policy (although without the control over trade deals 🦄 bit).

Last year an amendment on a customs union was *just* defeated with some err mistakes over pairing helping the Government.
Read 23 tweets
Jan 12, 2019
My @OpenEurope colleague Stephen Booth has taken a look at claims made by former Mi6 head Sir Richard Dearlove & ex-CDS Lord Guthrie

There are reasons to be sceptical about the PM’s Brexit deal, but the ones they raise are both implausible & misplaced

Here's why -

A thread 👇
2/ In the debate on the proposed Brexit deal, the implications for UK security & foreign policy have come a distant second to economic and institutional considerations.
3/ However, this week Richard Dearlove & Charles Guthrie wrote to Conservative Associations warning that the Brexit deal will “threaten the national security of the country in fundamental ways” and bind the UK into “new sets of EU controlled relationships”.
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(