Consider this statement:
“Steve Jobs was absolutely great at execution”
If someone’s response to this statement is “no” or “absolutely not”, and their rationale is that
“well, Steve Jobs was great at vision, strategy, design, taste and he hired people who were great at execution”
that means they don’t understand what great execution is, nor do they understand what great strategy is.
Many people have in their heads a neat separation between
a) “strategy” and
b) “execution”
These folks don’t actually understand what great execution entails.
In their career they have often been naive beneficiaries of a juggernaut whose current momentum is largely a function of its past momentum, not so much of the frenetic activity they seem to be so proudly & visibly engaged in right now.
These folks tend to associate great execution with discipline, experiments, structure & process, incentives & alignment, relentlessness, stakeholder management, project management, exec comms & optics, nights & weekends, hitting dates, etc. etc.
All of which can be important of course, but just those things by themselves will never make you great at execution.
Some people in product (even some executives) often forget that being great at “doing stuff and showing you’re doing stuff” is not the same as being great at execution.
Highly visible activity is not great execution.
Seemingly intense activity is not great execution.
Shipping on the committed date is not great execution.
Great execution is ultimately about outstanding results & singular impact.
Great execution requires superb intuition, creativity, strategic & clear thinking, influence, and having better ideas than anyone else — at every single step of the long long road to success.
One thing I don’t say often enough: I’ve done each of these seemingly contrarian things myself, driven outsized outcomes, and have decomposed why it works and when it doesn’t work (most people skip this last step).
And actually they aren’t that all that contrarian because the best in the business do this stuff all the time. It’s just that how they think is not transparent to most people, including sometimes themselves (similarly hard for Picasso or Steph Curry or Virat Kohli to tell you what actually makes them great).
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Some ppl are surprised by the exuberance with which PG’s Founder Mode blog post has been received. There are many reasons for its strong resonance.
But the main one is that it introduces a catchy term for something that many founders & leaders have seen & experienced first-hand.
Here’s my prediction: a majority of founders & leaders who said to themselves this weekend “henceforth I am going to be in Founder Mode” are likely to mess it up.
That is not bad per se. They might still end up being in a better place than if they continued with Manager Mode.
Product life in midsized & large companies starts making a lot more sense when you understand that a large % of middle & upper management thinks their main job is to (i) try & decipher what the CEO wants done (ii) align their org with it (iii) propose a plan that the CEO approves
This is instead of *often* telling the CEO what actually needs to be done, in a way that is grounded in (a) deep insight into customers & market (b) creative product & GTM solutions
Many in middle & upper management will of course blame incentives set by the company for this.
And they are not wrong. But it is worth evaluating how much of one’s career (and life) one wants to spend in aligning perfectly with incentives set by another party.
Everything we create, everything we do, it all starts with our thinking
Clear thinking drastically improves odds of success in all departments of career & life
While clear thinking is quite rare, it can be developed with practice
Advanced principles for clear thinking:
(1/12)
1) Essence first. Not story. Not analogy
Most people get seduced by great analogies & exciting stories.
Clear thinkers don’t *form* their thinking via analogies. They identify the essence of the issue, in their specific context. Then, they use analogies as one of their inputs.
2) WAYRTTD
“What Are You _Really_ Trying To Do” is a simple but powerful tool to make you pause & identify your real goal
Most people move too quickly to How & When to do a given task. But the task isn’t the goal
Clear thinkers have built a habit of asking themselves WAYRTTD.
Apple Pie Position:
A statement that instantly elevates the person who is saying it and is simultaneously hard for anyone else to push back on, and so everyone avoids the personal risk and just nods “yes”, even though its actual value in this specific situation might be… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Okay, so now that you understand Apple Pie, here’s your crash course on dealing with Apple Pie:
1) The greatest thing about Apple Pie Positions is that you now have a name to assign to a complex behavior (and it is a cute name, which helps a lot). Once you share this idea with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
One other important thing:
Note that Apple Pie Positions are, by definition, specific to the context. This means that the same sentence can be either the right thing to focus on, or it can be an Apple Pie Position. The way you determine which is which is through good judgment.