Good. @JoeNBC criticizes the bosses:
"We were told in no uncertain terms on Sunday night that there was going to be one news feed against all channels.... I guess after there was such strong blowback about what happened yesterday morning that they changed their plans.... We were very surprised, very disappointed."
In yesterday's statement, NBC News executives said they made this decision in collaboration with Joe and Mika. That, clearly, was a lie. We still need to know more about what happened at NBC News.
.@JoeNBC: "Next time we're told there's going to be a news feed replacing us, we will be in our chairs. And the news feed will be us or they can get somebody else to host this show."
Add this to the Ronna McDaniel revolt and I'd say NBC News executives have lost the confidence of their staff and stars.
I was part of the blowback yesterday. I've both agreed with and criticized the show today and that's what its there for. That is discourse.
With the failure of the Times & Post and CNN, MSNBC is all that we have left. Don't fuck it up, NBC.
What the fuck, MSNBC? You preempted your excellent weekend programming, @TheWeekendMSNBC and @AliVelshi, and now you've silenced @Morning_Joe in favor of your anodyne streaming news cos-play called Now? This is when we need the analysis and conversation these shows bring us (yes, with controversy; that is how public discourse works through it: with discussion). It is shocking that NBC/Comcast do not understand their own company's programs and raison d'etre. Bring back @JoeNBC and @morningmika. They may drive me crazy sometimes, but we need the dialog they enable.
Did some numbnuts NBC/Comcast/Universal executive decide an assassination attempt was a good time to promote its foundering streaming show? (I feel like we're living in AppleTV's Morning Show. UBS>NBC.) Or did this essentially Republican megacorporation decide to silence liberal voices? That's my theory and that's nothing short of election interference.
MSNBC: You'd damned well better not preempt @NicolleDWallace, @JoyAnnReid, @maddow, @chrislhayes, @Lawrence, and @AriMelber today or I'll come organize a picket line at 30 Rock.
Who's in charge there: journalists or Republican media moguls? MSNBC is the alternative to the bothsidesing of the Times, Post, and CNN that we need.
What the hell are you thinking?
In this defensive @NewYorker reaction to @JoeBiden (finally) criticizing the press that has been criticizing him, @jaycaspiankang shares an important insight about the falling power of the press, but I come to a different conclusion... 1/ newyorker.com/news/fault-lin…
Kang says that media are weakened and that's what makes it easy for Trump and now Biden alike to attack them. I say what it shows is that as media realize they have lost the agenda, their response is to shout louder and more often. That is what we see every day in the @NYTimes. 2/
In The Gutenberg Parenthesis, I chronicle--nay, celebrate--the death of mass media & the insult of the mass. Kang makes me see that I next need to examine mass media's behavior in their death throes. They are not accustomed to being talked back to, by their subjects or by the public. They respond with resentment. They dig in. 3/
Oh, Lord: The anodyne AP journalism of Buzbee to be replaced--in the design of the Murdochian henchman Will Lewis--by a Murdochian WSJ editor, then, as bad if not worse, a Telegraph editor. The crisis in US national journalism worsens! washingtonpost.com/pr/2024/06/02/…
I can't parse what the "third newsroom" is but it sounds very 2015--SEO, social, pivot to video--just as AI threatens to be a new web. I am worried that serving "Americans who feel traditional news is not for them but still want to be kept informed" is code for Post as Murdoch.
Good! @JoeNBC is excoriating the NYT/Sienna poll and the attention it gets. It warps. Yes. At moments such as this, I quote the late James Carey about how polls--all polls--preempt the public conversation they are intended to measure. From my book, The Gutenberg Parenthesis. 1/
Importantly, @JoeNBC is excoriating not just the poll but the Times reporting around it, quoting voters who've never voted. That is not journalism.
The Times--Haberman and Swan--triple down on their awful poll, using it to slap Biden in the story about Joe challenging the other guy to debates. A Haberman and Swan special:
Today I'm releasing a major paper on California's Journalism Preservation Act (& its federal cousin, JCPA): its weaknesses; the history of news & copyright; newspapers' long history of fighting new technologies & competitors--and alternative solutions. 1/ drive.google.com/file/d/1HHcDuU…
CJPA & JCPA are the latest from a long history of efforts by the news industry to diminish fair use and extend copyright for their exclusive benefit. Their must-carry clauses also, in my opinion, violate the 1st Amendment by requiring platforms to carry their speech. 2/
CJPA will benefit hedge funds & national--plus some extremist media--far more than California's own, cutting out much community, ethnic, & startup media. Link taxes break the web and set up a perverse incentive for clickbait. It will likely result in Meta deserting news there. 3/
"Most managers see AI as an existential threat," says @risj_oxford. That is because they think they are in the content business. In The Gutenberg Parenthesis, I argue content is a print-era notion now fully commodified. Journalism is service. reutersinstitute.politics.ox.ac.uk/news/how-media…
I say here it is time to give up on old news, to stop throwing good money & effort after bad. The first step in building a new journalism is to imagine it post-content (not dependent on scale & copyright): a journalism of service, community, collaboration. medium.com/whither-news/i…
What strategy do we see from the legacy news industry? Lobbying legislatures for expansion of copyright: CJPA, C-18, LSR and now AI (as I saw in the Senate last week). That's not a strategy for the future. It is building walls to keep the public out. buzzmachine.com/2024/01/11/in-…