Caritas as the Ideal in Tolkien's World 🧵
Christianity was the driving force behind Tolkien's worldview as shown in his writings, in particular in Lord of the Rings. Paul tells us in 1 Corinthians that the greatest of the Theological Virtues is love, or charity. Those societies that practiced it, were elevated over the others and presented as the good and free peoples. Those who rejected doing everything for love fell under the shadow. Let us examine these contrasting peoples.
The Shirefolk
Perhaps the most obvious example is the Shire. Its inhabitants loved their homeland and did their utmost to pour everything they had into their homes, families, and country. From agriculture, to food, to recreation, the hobbits lived lives rooted in a wholistic love of the good earth.
Isengard
By contrast, Isengard focused on mass production, destruction, and amassing power. Weaponry was manufactured at the expense of the neighboring forest, and violence was perpetrated against its neighbors. In the end nature itself rose against the vile actions of Isengard and deposed Saruman.
Rohan
The Rohirrim are described as loving their horses as much as their kin. Due to the sprawling nature of their fields, it was important to have tightly knit communities in order to offer mutual protection. Though they had no written records, the people of Rohan loved their heritage and passed it on from generation to generation through songs and tales taught by word of mouth. This land developed into one representative of stout heartedness and grit. It should come as no wonder that they proved pivotal in the triumph of The War of the Ring as they gave of themselves selflessly.
The Dunlendlings
In contrast with the Rohirrim, the Dunlendings embodied vice and a rejection of love. Taking every opportunity to hinder their equestrian neighbors, the Dunlendings were easily led astray by the lies of Saruman and waged war against Rohan. They were soundly defeated but treated mercifully by the riders. Hopefully, they learned their lesson in love through the beneveolence with which they were treated in defeat.
Gondor, Legacy of the Numenorians
Gondor is presented as one of the high cultures in learning, technology, and art. Its citizens took great pride in the virtues their nation was built upon as well as their responsibility to uphold order and balance in the West. Their civilization reached tremendous heights through love of nature and celebration of life. During their decline, it was a return to these loving principles which enabled them to rise above the threat of Mordor.
The Men of Harad
Opposed to the principles of Gondor were the Haradrim. They imposed their will on nature as shown by their cruel treatment of the magnificent oliphants. Their focus was on intimidation and violence as described in their affinity for war culture and elevation of the serpent banner. They did the bidding of Sauron and killed indiscriminately at his order. This barbaric behavior led to their demise in the War of the Ring.
Love and Truth as the Only Sustainable Path
Through his writings, Tolkien demonstrated the age old truth that evil destroys itself. It is only through love and order that society has any chance of continuing down a good path. We can see this demonstrated by the fates of the different peoples described. Their ultimate victory or defeat is determined by their virtue. Love serves as the catalyst for doing what is needed to secure victory in the face of seemingly hopeless conflicts. May we keep this in mind as we toil through life and must choose between love or vice.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Tolkien coined the word "eucatastrophe" to reference a seeming providential event that saves civilization from sliding into the abyss. It typically occurs unexpectedly and at the last, possible moment. Let us take a look at a few of these events in his writings.
The Fellowship Comes to Rohan
Consider Rohan's plight prior to Aragorn, Legolas, Gimli, Gandalf, Merry, and Pippin arriving there all in the most unexpected ways. Gandalf liberates the king from Saruman; Aragorn, Legolas, and Gimli prove instrumental in the victory at Helm's Deep; and the hobbits awake the ents who destroy Saruman's might for good. In the weeks prior, no one in Rohan could have anticipated such aid and their future looked uncertain at best.
Aragorn and the Army of the Dead
During the siege of Gondor, the people of the realm living further down the coast were very concerned over a mercenary fleet approaching from Umbar. Their lands stood at great risk of being destroyed and their lives taken. Aragorn then arrived leading a host of rangers, a few elves, a dwarf, and a legion of the dead that completely overwhelmed the corsairs. To say that this was unexpected to the Gondorians is an understatement. Nevertheless, the day was saved and the host went on to victory on the Fields of the Pelennor.
Faramir Appreciation 🧵
In days such as ours, filled with wicked enemies who seek to overthrow the moral order through great power, I think we could all draw a little inspiration from Faramir, Captain of Gondor.
Background
Faramir was entrusted with the duties of a captain in Gondor during a never ending war with Mordor. All his people could do was to defend themselves against constant threats from the Land of Shadow, but they lacked the strength to win the conflict.
As if this was not bad enough, Faramir lost his mother at a young age and had to live under his brother's shadow. His father, Denethor, clearly preferred his first born, Boromir, to Faramir.
Showing his Quality
Despite his bleak position, Faramir resisted the temptation to use evil for "good" ends. After capturing Frodo and Sam and learning the nature of their errand, Faramir famously choosing not to even see the ring, knowing just how wicked it was. His rejection of what we might call a near occasion of sin was truly heroic.
Sequel to Lord of the Rings: “The New Shadow”, Tolkien’s Abandoned Work🧵
Many folks are unaware that Tolkien began a sequel to the Lord of the Rings, set in the first century of the Fourth Age. It begins to recount the possible return of an older evil. Tolkien quickly abandoned it, though, as too depressing and unnecessary to his writings. However, what little bit we have seen of it further reveals the good professor’s subtle knowledge of human nature and the ways in which evil can gain a foothold even in defeat. Vigilance against wickedness and the risks associated with good times are also discussed. It touches on some very relevant themes to our day and age. Let us take a look at this largely ignored piece of wisdom. 1\6
Risks of Peace and Contentedness
Set in the Fourth Age of a now prospering Gondor, “The New Shadow” describes the end of the reign of King Eldarion. Growing numbers of people are restless and subsequently reverting to “orcish” behavior. Tolkien described this tendency in his letters explaining why he halted his work. “…it is inevitable that we should be concerned with the most regrettable feature of their [man’s] nature: their quick satiety with good.” -Letter 256 We can see this at work in the West. We are four generations removed from the last cataclysmic disaster to afflict the us, so now we make up our own problems and adopt ideologies that lead to confusion and dysfunction. 2/6
Elders and the Youth
Central to the tale are Borlas, and old man who is the younger son of Beregond from “The Return of the King”, and Saelon, a young man who is friends with the former’s son, Berelach. Speaking in his garden by the Anduin and within sight of Minas Tirith, Saelon and Borlas engage in a philosophical conversation about good and evil. Borlas condemns wasting resources as orcish and Saelon attempts to rebut the argument, arguing that cutting down trees is a normal activity. Borlas asserts that cutting a tree down for a good reason is morally acceptable. Tolkien uses this conversation to reveal an important truth about the need for rational morality. Saelon attempts to introduce chaos into society by refusing to see the obvious difference in an action’s merit base upon its motives. 3/6
Gandalf and Sauron were pitted against each other to determine who would have supremacy in Middle Earth during the Third Age. Tolkien did a brilliant job of demonstrating the opposing virtues and vices epitomized by each. Let’s look at this comparison to increase our understanding of their opposition not only on the battlefield, but also in their personal character. 1/6
Meek Humility Versus Prideful Power
Both Gandalf and Sauron were Maiar meaning they had essentially the same wieldable power. Nevertheless, both exhibited powers differently. Gandalf was a humble, old man. He was meek and never showed his powers unless necessary. The hobbits that loved his fireworks would never have know that he was able to slay a Balrog. By contrast, Sauron sought to use his power to dominate everything. His servants were completely under his will, like the orcs who were driven by his enmity. 2/6
Fellowship and Fidelity Versus Covetousness
Gandalf worked through his friends and sought to inspire good people to do good things in order to combat the darkness. He gave Bilbo and Frodo an opportunity to contribute to the War of the Ring; he freed Theodin from Saruman’s grasp; he tutored Aragorn as he emerged from exile. Meanwhile, Sauron sought to dominate all wills of Middle Earth. The Nazgul were completely subject to his will; the men of the South did whatever he asked; and Sauron launched wars upon the free lands of the West as he sought to consolidate power. 3/6
Gandalf, Saruman, and the Three Evangelical Counsels:
Western Monasticism is characterized by the nature of the three vows taken by all monks and religious brothers: Voluntary Poverty, Perpetual Chastity, and Perfect Obedience. Adherence to these traits is meant to lead the sinner closer to God by promoting detachment from all earthly objects.
The chasm between Gandalf and Saruman can be better understood by examining each in relation to these ideals. 1/6
Voluntary Poverty: The Grey Pilgrim vs. the Earthly Lord
Gandalf wandered from land to land, having no home and relying on the hospitality of others as he sought to aid the West against the threat of Sauron. The only possession he really had was Shadowfax during the War of the Ring, and even then, the stallion kept its autonomy and seemed to voluntarily follow Gandalf as his aid and fellow warrior.
Saruman, however, became a lord of men by assuming the regency of Isengard and operating not unlike a king. As Treebeard put it, Saruman is trying to become “…a power…” and “He has a mind of metal and wheels; and he does not care for growing things, except as far as they serve him for the moment.” In so doing, Saruman isolated himself and had no community to aid him. Isengard was destroyed, not by Gandalf, but by those (the ents) in league with him, who fought because it was the right things to do. 2/6
Perpetual Chastity: Gandalf’s Temperance vs. Saruman’s Lust
Though both wizards were chaste, one controlled his appetites and the other succumbed to his. Gandalf was a very powerful being and could have used his abilities to rival Sauron, and yet he abstained. Recognizing his own vulnerabilities, he refused to touch the ring and steered everyone towards the path of rejecting such lust. Gandalf also approached knowledge with humility. He learned through experience and only sought lore and extra knowledge in so far as it aided his mission.
Saruman first moved to Isengard in hopes of gaining the knowledge of many things including ring lore. His master design was to create his own ring of power to then supplant Sauron and become the one ruler of Middle Earth. Dominated by his lust for power, Saruman fell. Gandalf aptly described this turn of events, “It is perilous to study too deeply the arts of the Enemy, for good or for ill.” 3/6
Three Christ Figures in Lord of the Rings
Tolkien was very candid regarding his worldview behind The Lord of the Rings:
“The Lord of the Rings is of course a fundamentally religious and Catholic work; unconsciously so at first, but consciously in the revision.”
Though his writing is more subtle than say a C.S. Lewis with the Aslan character, Christ still has a central role. The three Christ-types, usually referenced as Priest, Prophet, and King can be demonstrated by the three characters most associated with the defeat of Sauron: Frodo, Gandalf, and Aragorn.
Here is a closer look. 1/6
Frodo: The Priest
From a Catholic perspective, the role of priest dates back to the Old Testament priest Melchizedek who offered a sacrifice of bread and wine. Later, Christ offered the sacrifice of Himself on our behalf. Frodo follows this pattern of self-sacrifice as he carries the burden of the ring on what is basically a suicide mission. It is, however, the only way to truly save Middle Earth from the threat of domination by Sauron. The only hope for humanity to triumph over sin and death was a divine sacrifice by the Son. In a way, Frodo offers himself for our salvation. 2/6
Gandalf: The Prophet
The Old Testament prophets had several, distinguishing characteristics. They were typically shunned in their native land, they communed with God, and they traveled the land warning leaders of calamity should they stray from the path of righteousness. Though not universally despised, and not technically being born in a specific part of Middle Earth, Gandalf checks the other boxes. He clearly sees and perceives more than the mortals around him can. He has a close relationship with the Valar and Iluvatar himself. Gandalf’s mission is to combat Sauron and to warn and aid the leaders of Middle Earth in their fight against this emissary of Morgoth. Some leaders, like Denethor, reject him. Finally, Gandalf is brought back to life, a very Biblical aspect, but he also never dies. Rather, he sails away to the undying lands when his task was done. The prophets Enoch and Elijah were both assumed into Heaven without experiencing physical death. Both the prophets and Gandalf had very specific roles to fulfill during their earthly lives. 3/6