The Cultural Tutor Profile picture
Jul 26, 2024 25 tweets 9 min read Read on X
Why does Paris look the way it does?

Well, until the year 1853 it was a diseased and overcrowded Medieval city — then the biggest urban renovation in history was announced.

This is the story of how Paris was transformed into the world's most popular city... Image
First: the context.

King Louis-Philippe of France was overthrown in 1848 and Louis-Napoleon, nephew of Napoleon Bonaparte, was elected President of the Second Republic that same year.

Three years later he staged a coup and became Emperor Napoleon III — France's final monarch. Image
For centuries — ever since the Dark Ages — Paris had been one of Europe's biggest and most important cities.

But by the 19th century, as famously described in the works of Victor Hugo, Paris had become overcrowded and ravaged by disease — the urban poor were suffering. Image
So Napoleon III formed a grand ambition to totally rebuild the city and turn Paris into a modern metropolis.

The first man he appointed as "Prefect of Seine" to carry out his plans wasn't up to the task.

And so Napoleon turned to a civil servant called Georges-Eugène Haussmann. Image
Haussmann was talented, determined, and possessed an uncanny ability for overcoming any obstacle in his way.

And, crucially, he shared Napoleon's vision for a new, bright, clean, and beautiful Paris — a city where working people could lead decent lives.

As the Emperor said: Image
So, starting in 1853, Haussman was given free rein by Napoleon to redesign and rebuild Paris.

The core of this plan was a system of boulevards radiating out from the Arc de Triomphe, interwoven with smaller streets and squares.

Light, space, transport, and a sense of grandeur. Image
They also annexed suburbs around Paris, increasing the number of arrondissements from 12 to 20 and the city's population from 400,000 to over 1.5 million.

This was an act of urban planning on a scale never seen before — only Barcelona's contemporaneous "Eixample" is comparable. Image
They demolished about 20,000 buildings containing 120,000 lodgings or apartments, and replaced them with 34,000 new buildings containing over 215,000 apartments and lodgings.

They also demolished hundreds of streets — this is what a typical Parisian street once looked like... Image
...to be replaced by spacious boulevards.

Whereas the older streets had been as little as 5 metres wide, the new ones were at least 12 metres and 24 in some places.

Captured perfectly in Camille Pissarro's four paintings of the Boulevard Montmartre, from the 1890s. Image
Haussmann also led the construction of new sewers, aqueducts, street lighting, and other public infrastructure.

A reminder of his and Napoleon's concern for the working classes of Paris and their living conditions.

Paris was being dragged out of the Middle Ages. Image
As part of this vast construction programme many other large-scale projects were commissioned, including new town halls for the arrondissements.

The Paris Opera House, the Gare du Nord, and the Church of St Augustine are just three other examples.

A city reborn. Image
Napoleon, inspired by London, wanted to fill Paris with public parks.

So Haussmann created the Bois de Boulogne in the west, the Bois de Vincennes in the east, the Parc des Buttes-Chaumont in the north, and the Parc Montsouris in the south.

600,000 trees planted in 17 years. Image
But the most distinctive feature of Haussmann's renovation is the so-called "Haussmann Building".

He imposed strict regulations about how the newly constructed buildings along Paris' boulevards must look — including their height, width, and external architecture and decoration. Image
Haussmann even stressed that they must be built or faced with Lutetian limestone, and ordered that they be repaired at least every ten years.

This explains the striking uniformity and distinctive aesthetic of Parisian architecture. Image
Why did Napoleon and Haussmann enforce such strict rules?

What they wanted was a city in which buildings weren't individual structures, but were part of a broader, cohesive whole.

The idea was to give Paris a unique identity — and it worked. Image
And so this is the most remarkable thing about Haussmann's renovation — its authoritarian nature.

Taken out of context, the language and rules and totalitarian scope of his vast urban reconstruction sound almost Orwellian.
Le Corbusier himself, the father of modern architecture, later proposed his "Plan Voisin" in 1925.

It would redevelop central Paris with 18 colossal, identical skyscrapers — similar, in its uniformity and absolutism, to Haussmann's plan. Image
And yet the result of Haussmann's renovation, backed by Napoleon III and authoritarian in nature, was the creation of one of the world's most beloved cities.

Paris has for a long time been, and remains, the world's number one tourist destination. Image
But the thing is... people at the time hated Haussmann's work.

Political rivals vigorously opposed the lavish expenditure and the public bemoaned the decades of continuous, disruptive construction works. Image
And, perhaps surprisingly, many disapproved of Haussmann's plan on moral and aesthetic grounds.

They thought the Medieval charm of Paris was being destroyed, that this renovation was an act of desecration, of "awful materialism".

As the Prime Minister Jules Ferry said: Image
The later historian René Héron de Villefosse wrote this about what Haussmann did — accusing him of megalomania, bad taste, anti-traditionalism, and even of being too American!

Criticisms that seem strange, if not downright ridiculous, now. Image
Napoleon was eventually forced to sack Haussmann under public and political pressure, but others continued his work and in 1927 the final stage of the plan was complete.

Thus the Paris of today was born — with the notable addition of the equally hated Eiffel Tower in 1889. Image
A century and a half after Haussmann's dismissal such opposition feels odd.

Because there seems to be little modern about Paris, dominated as it is by traditional architecture and notably lacking skyscrapers.

People go there for the very reasons Haussmann was derided. Image
Since then, of course, plenty of new and equally iconic buildings have been added to Paris — a smattering of modernism amid its mansards and boulevards.

From the Pompidou Centre to the Louvre's Glass Pyramid to the infamous Tour Montparnasse. Image
And so the story of Paris' renovation is instructive for many reasons.

Foremost among them is that, it would seem, a beautiful city can be consciously planned and created.

And, further, that everything old or traditional was once startlingly and even scandalously modern.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Cultural Tutor

The Cultural Tutor Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @culturaltutor

Jun 18
Which would you want to live in? Image
Art Nouveau was about imbuing every single part of a building, including all its furniture and fittings, with the curves of nature.

Rather than being inspired by the past, by historical decorations, this was about finding a new and authentic source of ideas. Image
But they didn't just imitate nature; the designers of Art Nouveau adopted its general principles.

And the result is that every single thing they designed makes you feel like you've never seen it before.

A century later and even their fireplaces still look futuristic. Image
Read 13 tweets
Jun 10
Who's to blame for boring architecture? Image
Politics and architecture don't map onto one another very well; trying to understand what leads to good architecture through political "isms" doesn't really get us anywhere.

While the USSR was building a baroque metro system, the USA was building modernist skyscrapers: Image
So the architecture debate is very strange, because opposing "sides" feel obliged to defend things that don't match their other views.

Some people want more "traditional" architecture, and others defend "modern" architecture.

These are, broadly speaking, the supposed "sides". Image
Read 25 tweets
Jun 8
Taking decoration away from buildings is like creating a world where trees never have any leaves: Image
The biggest difference between how we build now and how we used to build (in terms of appearance) is that we no longer decorate anything.

There are thousands of other changes (regulations, materials, size) but this is the one that people notice. Image
And this was, partly, a conscious aesthetic choice.

If you look at the early modernists like Adolf Loos and Le Corbusier, they are very open about their belief that decoration was no longer necessary.

As Loos said, famously: Image
Read 25 tweets
Jun 3
The truth about minimalism: Image
"Minimalism" is badly misunderstood, but that's not really anybody's fault, because we're living in a time where it feels like minimalism is the dominant aesthetic.

Everything from buildings to bollards are designed the same way: simple, no details, little variety or colour. Image
And so, because they're simple, we call it "minimalism".

But minimalism was never just about keeping things simple.

The point of minimalism is using beautiful materials to make useful things (like this chair), not making things as bland and greyscale as possible. Image
Read 25 tweets
Mar 3
Friedensreich Regentag Dunkelbunt Hundertwasser is the best modern architect you've never heard of.

His philosophy was simple. As he said:

"The straight line is godless and immoral."

If there's any building you can think of, he made it look like something from a dream... Image
Accommodation at a children's hospital in Essen, Germany, from 2005: Image
A kindergarten in Frankfurt, opened in 1995: Image
Read 23 tweets
Aug 31, 2025
We spend more than 90% of our time inside, so why do we design so many of our interiors like this?

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting.

It's generic, boring, and genuinely bad for our physical and psychological health... Image
Not all interiors look like this, but too many do, and more all the time.

Grey carpets, white walls, harsh lighting, neutral colours for details, everything plastic, shiny, and rectangular.

This has become the standard for new buildings (and refurbishments) around the world. Image
A common response is that some people like it, or at least don't mind it.

Maybe, but that's the problem.

The sum of all tastes is no taste at all, and if our aim is simply to make things that people "don't mind" then we end up with blandness. Image
Read 22 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(