I'm enjoying that the couch jokes are bugging Republicans but I'm enjoying it almost more that they are bugging harumphing, self-consciously morally superior Dems. "We're better than this." No we're not. Knife those fuckers.
The couch thing is an example of what @joshtpm used to call "bitch slap politics" (I think has wisely used different terms since. "Dominance politics"?) It's not rooted in fact, it's not a substantive critique, it's got nothing to do with policy, it's just ...
@joshtpm ... "we're mocking you because you're pathetic & we feel like it." The irrationality of it, the fact that it's made up & kind of ridiculous, is the *point*. This is not about exchanging semantic information. It's about kicking sand in someone's face. It's a dominance play.
@joshtpm The left is typically on the ass end of these dominance plays, because it is the only mode of engagement that the right understands or is capable of any more. For the right, there's nothing to politics *but* dominance. And the left just loves being the 98-lb weakling.
@joshtpm We are in a rare moment when the left is feeling its oats. It has a little swagger! It's been a long time. Finally, it can stick its chest out, be the one kicking sand instead of the one coughing & apologizing for putting its face in the way. Finally!
@joshtpm It is so, so, SO telling that even in this moment, you have a chorus of folks -- fresh from gazing at themselves in the mirror & complimenting themselves for how reasonable they are -- scolding lefties for showing a little muscle.
@joshtpm I know lots of people wish that politics were a matter of evidence & reasoned argument & coming together despite our differences. And maybe someday we can get some of that back. But right now, it's a knife fight, and being ostentatiously high-minded ...
@joshtpm ... might get you approving notice from the other harumphing pundits, but it won't do shit to keep the fascists out of office. Trump -- fascists generally -- succeed by puffing themselves up to look larger than they are. We need to make them look small. Mockery does that.
Just to conclude: I understand entirely if dominance politics makes you uncomfortable, if you find it aesthetically or even morally distasteful. I too would rather be in a grad seminar. But it clearly *works*. And especially in this election ...
... winning is much more important than a campaign that flatters your personal tastes & predilections. Saving actual lives, preventing actual suffering, is more morally significant than discourse that flatters your identity.
Get a taste for blood. Fight!
Wait, one more point & then I'm really done: if you want to know what reaches & sways semi-engaged swing voters, it's this, not policy. The fact that Dems remain polite even when receiving endless wedgies *communicates more than their 'messaging'*. It communicates weakness.
Just think about the evolution from Biden's "threat to democracy" language (high-minded harumphing from a soapbox) to the Harris/Walz "good lord these are some creepy, weird fuckers" language (what you'd say to a friend). Same basic message. But it *feels* different.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One thing's already clear: Harris's Happy Warrior persona a) is incredibly appealing to meme-happy young people, and b) drives the right craaaaaazy. It infuriates them on such a deep level. The best thing she can do is: stay happy, stay laughing, mock these clowns, have fun.
It's going to be difficult. The harumphing jackasses on the right will be joined by harumphing centrist columnists and harumphing cable news anchors, all of whom will harumph about how this is Serious Business and she needs more gravitas & etc. Ignore them.
One thing conservatives (and lots of conservative Dems) feel in their gut is that a black woman in public life shouldn't be happy, or joyful, or silly. She should be grateful that we let her in the door, right? She should be genuflecting & making us feel magnanimous, right?
I watched the entire @AOC IG thing and I encourage you to do the same. Lots of people are on here caricaturing or mischaracterizing what she said. She is *not* ride-or-die for Biden. She's not dismissing anyone's fears about him. She's not telling anyone what to think.
What she's doing is acting like a fucking adult, ie, thinking through the problem in a systematic way, raising concerns that have been obscured by the unbelievable groupthink stampede of pundits & rich donors.
She's speaking to her constituents honestly, without bullshit. She wants them to know that the people behind this are not just averse to Biden, they want to parachute in the exact white moderates of their choosing, despite the near-impossible logistics of it.
In their int'l bestseller How Democracies Die, scholars Levitsky & Ziblatt point to one phenomenon above all others: democracies die, not just when there's a reactionary authoritarian movement, but when *center-right political & business elites join it*. amzn.to/3ycYLrj
Those center-right elites think they can manage the movement, use it to their own benefit, without letting it get out of hand. It never works. It always gets out of hand.
We are watching that process play out, here in the US, in the most flat-footed, explicit way possible.
Things might be different if those elites ran into a unified wall of social disapprobation when they tried this. They'd drop it like they touched a hot stove.
But that's not what's happening. Instead pundits are casting them as savvy operators. They're being rewarded.
One of the most shocking things you discover when you start covering US politics closely -- at least naive young me found it shocking -- is that most political journalists don't seem to give even a tiny shit about policy.
My take on politics, though I'm not sure I could have articulated it, is "I want good results -- increased welfare -- for my fellow citizens, and to get it, I have to figure out how this stuff works." I kind of assumed that's why anyone would pay attention to politics.
But I've spent a *lot* of time over the years talking to or working alongside political journalists & it is just wild how little it comes up & how little curiosity they evince about it, except insofar as it represents some sort of power play in the Great Game.
🧵The main thing Americans do not understand/appreciate about presidential elections is that you are not voting for a person, you are voting for an *administration* -- cabinet members, appointees, military leaders, advisers & analysts, the whole civil service, etc. etc.
You're voting for an executive branch -- that's an *enormous* organization. The president himself makes only a tiny fraction of the decisions in the day-to-day management of that org. It's a whole apparatus, vastly larger than one individual.
Yet people instinctively think -- and the media reinforces this misperception at every term -- that the president, this one person, is "in charge" of the US & responsible for everything that happens, that their unique personal capabilities determine the country's fate.
"Japan’s meteorological agency has issued a heatstroke alert for 26 of the country’s 47 prefectures, urging people not to go outside unless absolutely necessary, to use their air conditioners during the day and at night, and to drink plenty of water."