The heathen Gods have gathered on mount Olympus for a feast. Sun god Apollo is recognizable by his halo, Bacchus (Dionysus) by the grapes, Neptune (Poseidon) by his trident, Diana (Artemis) by the moon, Venus (Aphrodite) by Cupid.
You can also see Minerva, the godess of wisdom, and of course Mars, the god of war (next to Venus, the godess of love who had a well known relationship).
There certainly is some resemblance with "The Last Supper' by da Vinci from 1495. Van Bijlert was apparently inspired by it to depict a heathen feast.
Jan Hermansz van Bijlert (Utrecht 1597/98-1671) was a Dutch painter who is considered one of the Utrecht Caravaggists, 17th-century artists who traveled to Italy as part of their training and came under the strong influence of the works of Caravaggio.
So this tableau vivant is in no way an insult to Christians. If anything one might claim that the pagan gods are insulted because the often somewhat effeminate Apollo is depicted as a plus-sized woman.
All in all, this depiction of Bijlerts piece of art seems fitting, since its about the gathering of the Greek gods on mount Olympus and this is where the Olympic games originate.
Here ends the translation. But I want to add a few tweets of my own.
First: I know, that some people in the Olympic organization seem to be confused themselves and have apologized for depicting the last supper. But I hope we can all agree that the art director wasn't confused and this is the obvious explanation of the tableau vivant.
But even if it was: this is the country where Voltaire (actually Evelyn Beatrice Hall, but let's leave that alone for now) famously stressed freedom of expression.
I would have been *disappointed* if they kept everything commercial, shallow and middle of the road.
I think the opening ceremony was beautiful, cultured, and a celebration of freedom. It was not a bland US Coca Cola commercial but something more artful and playful.
For me it's a reason to love the French even more.
And Marie Antoinette's revolutionary song (singing "the aristocrats we'll hang them") after being beheaded was not anti-Christian either.
It was simply a festival of color and sound with a nod to a famous moment in French history.
Finally, it's true that the Olympics didn't shy away from celebrating diversity in love and race. But if you think that's wrong, I think that's on you. France showed us they are free, cultured and secular, and I am here for it!
Many people saying the organization admitted it was the last supper. Well, they are wrong. Here is Thomas Jolly, the artistic director of the opening ceremony, explaining that the explanation in this thread was indeed correct.
I also like this detail: Apollo is not only recognizable because of the halo (being a sun god and all) but also because ancient Apollo has a lute while modern Apollo has a DJ installation.
(Why do 17 drag queens with a DJ installation along a catwalk equal a last supper?)
Ouch, now it's getting serious because lovers of Asterix and Obelix are wading into the fray. That's serious stuff in France!
They are deeply shocked at the Olympics blasphemous rendition of the last supper in the famous Gallic village.
If it reminded you of the last supper that is fine btw. The actor playing Apollo also saw the reference (left) before she corrected herself (right) and said "it was not sacriledge". And French TV could not withstand a wordplay either. But it wasn't meant as the last supper.
@DavidMavis11 @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump I mean, even you must have wondered what Dionysus was doing at the last supper and why that plus-sized woman had such a beautiful dress and a halo.
@machBmachBmach @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @JulienHoez Here's the actual artist.
If you add batteries to solar PV, not all energy has to flow through batteries. But let's keep it at $0.01 and add that to the price of solar. That makes PV (and wind) SUPER cheap!
Batteries must be discounted more quickly you say?
Cheap stationary batteries will pave the way for wind and solar in cheap and resilient energy grids. Unfortunately the @IEA is mispredicting it (again).
Many of my followers know this picture: it visualizes how the IEA underestimates solar. Now I see basically the same problem in their new battery report.
The IEAs new battery report gives a lot of great info on batteries but also two predictions taken from their authoritative world energy outlook: 1) STEPS which is basically business as usual 2) NZE (Net Zero Emissions) which is aspirational iea.org/reports/batter…
I used the Sunday afternoot to describe how I think that dirt cheap batteries will completely transform our electricity grid, paving the way for solar and wind and replacing grid reinforcements with grid buffers aukehoekstra.substack.com/p/batteries-ho…
This is something I'm working on for different government and grid operator projects, but I never realized just how cheap sodium batteries could become and how much of a game changer that will be.
So I used my Sunday evening to write this and would love your feedback!
First I look at the learning curve and then we see it is extremely predictable: every doubling of production has reduced prices by around 25%.
It's even steeper and more predictable than solar panels, the poster child of this type of learning curve.
(More details on substack.)
Aaaand we have another winner of the "EVs and renewables can never happen because of material scarcety" sweepstake. I thought @pwrhungry was more serious. Let me explain why this is misleading bollox.
First of all, notice how his argument is mainly that Vaclav Smil says this and HE is an authority.
Why bother to write a substack that basically parrots someone else?
Because you don't really understand it yourself and needed to write another substack maybe?
I'm a bit tired of this because Bryce abuses Smil the same way most people who are against renewables abuse him. They emphasize this is a serious and revered figure that knows numbers. They make it about the messenger, not the argument.
For me the focus on *how much electricity* an industry uses usually indicates an outdated focus.
We have to get rid of fossil fuels and the mantra is "electrify everything". Because electricity is the form of energy that is usually more efficient and that is greening rapidly.
Many people still can't wrap their heads around the fact that electricity from wind and solar is getting clean, abundant and relatively cheap while we have more than enough materials to make it happen.
IF you focus on datacenter electricity use...
focus on how green it is.