The heathen Gods have gathered on mount Olympus for a feast. Sun god Apollo is recognizable by his halo, Bacchus (Dionysus) by the grapes, Neptune (Poseidon) by his trident, Diana (Artemis) by the moon, Venus (Aphrodite) by Cupid.
You can also see Minerva, the godess of wisdom, and of course Mars, the god of war (next to Venus, the godess of love who had a well known relationship).
There certainly is some resemblance with "The Last Supper' by da Vinci from 1495. Van Bijlert was apparently inspired by it to depict a heathen feast.
Jan Hermansz van Bijlert (Utrecht 1597/98-1671) was a Dutch painter who is considered one of the Utrecht Caravaggists, 17th-century artists who traveled to Italy as part of their training and came under the strong influence of the works of Caravaggio.
So this tableau vivant is in no way an insult to Christians. If anything one might claim that the pagan gods are insulted because the often somewhat effeminate Apollo is depicted as a plus-sized woman.
All in all, this depiction of Bijlerts piece of art seems fitting, since its about the gathering of the Greek gods on mount Olympus and this is where the Olympic games originate.
Here ends the translation. But I want to add a few tweets of my own.
First: I know, that some people in the Olympic organization seem to be confused themselves and have apologized for depicting the last supper. But I hope we can all agree that the art director wasn't confused and this is the obvious explanation of the tableau vivant.
But even if it was: this is the country where Voltaire (actually Evelyn Beatrice Hall, but let's leave that alone for now) famously stressed freedom of expression.
I would have been *disappointed* if they kept everything commercial, shallow and middle of the road.
I think the opening ceremony was beautiful, cultured, and a celebration of freedom. It was not a bland US Coca Cola commercial but something more artful and playful.
For me it's a reason to love the French even more.
And Marie Antoinette's revolutionary song (singing "the aristocrats we'll hang them") after being beheaded was not anti-Christian either.
It was simply a festival of color and sound with a nod to a famous moment in French history.
Finally, it's true that the Olympics didn't shy away from celebrating diversity in love and race. But if you think that's wrong, I think that's on you. France showed us they are free, cultured and secular, and I am here for it!
Many people saying the organization admitted it was the last supper. Well, they are wrong. Here is Thomas Jolly, the artistic director of the opening ceremony, explaining that the explanation in this thread was indeed correct.
I also like this detail: Apollo is not only recognizable because of the halo (being a sun god and all) but also because ancient Apollo has a lute while modern Apollo has a DJ installation.
(Why do 17 drag queens with a DJ installation along a catwalk equal a last supper?)
Ouch, now it's getting serious because lovers of Asterix and Obelix are wading into the fray. That's serious stuff in France!
They are deeply shocked at the Olympics blasphemous rendition of the last supper in the famous Gallic village.
If it reminded you of the last supper that is fine btw. The actor playing Apollo also saw the reference (left) before she corrected herself (right) and said "it was not sacriledge". And French TV could not withstand a wordplay either. But it wasn't meant as the last supper.
@DavidMavis11 @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump I mean, even you must have wondered what Dionysus was doing at the last supper and why that plus-sized woman had such a beautiful dress and a halo.
@machBmachBmach @elonmusk @realDonaldTrump @JulienHoez Here's the actual artist.
Renewables also had a role: "tension was very high and sustained, causing the disconnection of generators".
An inside source tells me the voltage went above 110% in many places and solar was required to switch off, which meant 8GW was lost all at once.elpais.com/economia/2025-…
Let's start with some quantifiable facts. (Things this conservative armchair energy philosopher is allergic to.)
First thing we notice is that solar and wind are clearly surpassing nuclear (though the new leadership of the department of energy denies it).
Many people think solar and wind won't be able to keep the grid stable because they lack "inertia".
I think solar, wind and batteries will do a BETTER job and I think you can explain it thus:
- the old grid is a record player
- the new grid a digital player
🧵
If you play vinyl records, the rotating mass of the turntable is used to keep the speed steady. This leads some vinyl enthusiasts to seek more mass because that will keep things more steady.
This turntable by Excel audio attaches a separate mass. (Overkill but makes my point.)
In the same way the inertia in the rotors of current power plants helps the grid to keep a steady 50 Hz (in e.g. Europe) or 60 Hz (in e.g. the US) frequency.
These machines turn a heavy copper coil wound around a heavy iron core and this helps keep the grid frequency steady.
If you add batteries to solar PV, not all energy has to flow through batteries. But let's keep it at $0.01 and add that to the price of solar. That makes PV (and wind) SUPER cheap!
Batteries must be discounted more quickly you say?