1/ Social psychologists long ago proved something utterly terrifying
People will disregard WHAT THEY SEE WITH THEIR OWN EYES to conform to what other people say
In a classic 1951 experiment by Solomon Asch, people looked at a picture of three lines & were asked to choose which
2/ one was same length as a “target” line, which was right in front of them
The correct choice was OBVIOUS
But person after person gave the wrong answer, out loud, when others picked the wrong line
WHEN THE TRUTH WAS RIGHT IN FRONT OF THEIR FACES
3/ Watch the video and see for yourself
This happened even when the truth was visibly obvious
If person after person will say something that is blatantly false to conform with total strangers, imagine what can happens when the truth is more ambiguous or complex, as with social,
4/ cultural, or political issues
And imagine if it’s not just random strangers in a psychology experiment, but people whose acceptance you really want
But we don't have to imagine, because it's happening all around us
Otherwise sane people are saying things right
5/ out loud that are batshit crazy
Given the social pressure to conform, people will literally say the truth is a lie and a lie is the truth, right is wrong and wrong is right, up is down and down is up
And huge numbers of people will just jump right on that bandwagon
6/ But here’s where it gets interesting
In the famous line experiment, people who gave the wrong answer fell into three groups
1️⃣Those who saw the truth and knowingly said something they didn’t believe, just to go along
2️⃣Those who saw the truth but thought the others must be
7/ right and they must be mistaken
3️⃣Those who, after hearing others say the wrong thing, COULD NO LONGER SEE what was in front of them, and literally saw the the longer line as short & the shorter line as long
Their actual ability to perceive reality had been compromised
8/ And of course there’s one more group, although it was not an option in this particular experiment
There are those who see reality correctly but REMAIN SILENT when people around them start saying things that are batshit crazy
Which group are YOU in?
9/ If you found this thread valuable and want more insights on psychology, psychotherapy, and mental health:
✅ RT the first tweet of the thread & share the ❤️
✅ Follow me @JonathanShedler
2/ I was going to leave it there but, clearly, I need to say more. We are mammals, and the product of eons of evolution. We are born with an attachment system and require emotional/physiological attunement of another human to develop/grow/thrive. We require attunement to
3/ experience secure attachment, and we require secure attachment to develop the capacity to self-regulate, and to learn new ways of thinking/behaving/responding more generally. This is what we’re after in meaningful psychotherapy. It requires activation of the attachment system,
1/ The DSM disorders we typically treat in psychotherapy are *descriptions* of symptoms, not explanations for them. Until recently, DSM itself stated this clearly
/2 In fact, in the context of ongoing and skilled work in psychotherapy, it is possible (and necessary) to formulate and confirm/disconfirm hypotheses about underlying psychological causes. These hypotheses—or clinical case formulations—are necessarily specific to the individual
3/ patient, never generic & never knowable prior to engaging in the process of inquiry & exploration (which is the work of psychotherapy)
One serious adverse consequence of the DSM is that it often leads to a short circuiting of this process by giving both clinicians & patients
“It is so much easier for [traumatized patients] to talk about what has been done to them—to tell a story of victimization and revenge—than to notice, feel, and put into words the reality of their internal experience”
—Bessel van der Kolk, The Body Keeps the Score
2/ I’ll add it's often fairly easy to tell who has benefited from meaningful psychotherapy and who has not. Those caught in what vdK calls the “story of victimization and revenge” have not. Those able to reflect on their experience in more complex and nuanced ways, in the context
3/ of a larger integrated narrative of the arc of their lives, have
It absolutely breaks my heart that we have “therapists” whose approach to trauma reinforces the former instead of helping patients work toward the latter
@DrGipps The DSM disorders we typically treat in psychotherapy are *descriptions* of symptoms, not explanations for them. Until recently, DSM itself stated this clearly
@DrGipps /2 In fact, in the context of ongoing & skilled work in psychotherapy, it is possible (and necessary) to formulate and confirm/disconfirm hypotheses about underlying psychological causes. These hypotheses—or clinical case formulations—are necessarily specific to the individual
@DrGipps 3:/ patient, never generic and never knowable prior to engaging in the process of inquiry and exploration (which is the work of psychotherapy)
One serious adverse consequence of the DSM is that often short circuits this process, by giving clinicians & patients both the illusion
1/ We are the “authors” of all our thoughts & actions. We claim ownership of some of our thoughts and actions and disclaim ownership of others
When we claim ownership, we tend to use the word “I.” I did this. I said that
When we disclaim ownership, we tend to use the word “it”
2/ For example: I didn't mean it. The devil made me do it. It wasn’t me, it was the the alcohol. It wasn't me, that's not who I am. It just happened
Freud observed this & used exactly these words, “I” & “it,” to describe thoughts & actions that we claim & disclaim, respectively:
3/ “Das Is und Das Es.” I and it
The words were unfortunately mistranslated as ego & id, by a translator who thought he needed to make it sound more science-y. Unfortunate, because the original words were experience-near & intuitive to anyone. The simple starting observation of