Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
B.M. Profile picture
@ireallyhateyou
Jul 29, 2024 • 62 tweets • 14 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
MK Ahmad Tibi (TA'AL): To insert a stick in a person's rectum, is that legitimate???
MK Hanoch Milwidsky (Likud): Yes! If he is a Nukhba everything is legitimate to do him!

Some of you have probably already heard about the events in Sde Teiman concentration camp today: MPs came to arrest soldiers suspected of sodomizing a Palestinian captive, the soldiers in the base revolted, refused to leave and threatened to take active action against the MPs.
The idea of any soldier getting arrested for anything done to a Palestinian is incomprehensible to Israelis these days (even though the investigations are all cover-ups for the ICJ/ICC anyway), so the events caused a big outrage. Right-winger reservist soldiers and members of government arrived at Sde Teiman to try and thwart the arrests.

In this clip we see Likud Member of Knesset Hanoch Milwidsky announcing a "voting strike" in response to the attempts to arrest the rapist soldiers.
Just in: dozens of the "protesters" broke into the base.
Correction for the first tweet: "to do *to* him"
"The Reservists - The Victory Generation" posted this call for action to come help the poor poor rapist soldiers who are being "abused" by the military police, according to them. This organization, of course, like all the dodgy right-wing supposed "grassroots" movements, is affiliated to the government.Image
Among the rioters who broke into the base: Judeo-Nazi MK Zvi Sukkot from Religious Judaism party
The rioters arrived to the compound where the Palestinian abductees are. Police is there, but doesn't do anything.
Among the rioters: Minister Amichai Eliyahu, MK Almog Cohen. Eliyahu was documented chanting "Death to Terrorists" with other rioters. The protesters are walking freely around the base and the event is not under control at the moment.
Soldiers pepper sprayed Military Police investigators.
Channel 12 team was attacked. Rioters called them "traitors" and "Hamas" and took their equipment.
The break-in
In this video Amichai Eliyahu is seen with rioters around him chanting "Death to Terrorists". At least in this video it doesn't look like he's joining them though.
Zvi Sukkot called protestors to stop confronting the soldiers and exit the base.
Beitar Jerusalem violent hooligan group "La Familia" announced they will be "protesting" in 45 minutes in Beit Lid junction, near Netanya.
MK Nissim Vaturi (Likud) arrived at the scene as well.
Larger forces of police have also arrived and are not finally managing the situation
The reason for the planned "protest" near Netanya is that the suspected soldiers are being held there.
Minister Yitzhak Wasserlauf of Jewish Power is also at the scene.
Large police forces arrive
So far there seems to be a coalition-wide consensus against the decision to take the soldiers to interrogation (earlier the suspects agreed to go after the MPs said they'd just be taken to interrogation and not formally arrested.)
The "protesters" left the base and are now "protesting" outside
After the rioters exited the base the cops took off, and there is no more police there. The rioters are blocking the entrance to the base, no one can come in or out.

Meanwhile in Beit Lid a few hundred right wingers gathered and are trying to break into the base where the soldiers are being interrogated.
Multiple reports of rioters attacking journalists Image
Likud Member of Knesset Tally Gotliv with armed, masked soldiers at the Beit Lid riot. Likud flags are everywhere in this so-called "protest".

All mainstream media teams were physically attacked and police had to get them out of the crowd (without arresting anyone, of course). Image
Another photo of the charming lady Gotliv and her salt-of-the-earth friends. Image
The government-affiliated thugs are still trying to break into Beit Lid base where the detained (alleged) rapists are held.

Video: Bar Peleg
"Protesters" are trying to break the main gate in Beit Lid.
According to reports, they now managed to break in.
Another "protest" started in Ramat HaSharon, in front of the Military Prosecutor's house.
Rioters inside the Beit Lid compound
They are inside the military courthouse. Soldiers were sent to try and stop them.

Video: Bar Peleg
Confrontations in Beit Lid with soldiers and police.

Video: Bar Peleg
Zvi Sukkot, the Member of Knesset who led the storming of Sde Teiman, is now getting a prime time interview on Israel's most popular channel, Channel 12 Image
Ha'aretz: dozens are surrounding the base's detention unit. No police around.
Circulating on Israeli Telegram channels:
"Prisoners' tales"
"The Nukhba who got it in the ass" Image
The rioters outside the detention facility:
Rioters outside the detention facility.

Reportedly, the army is now dispersing them using water cannons and pepper spray.
More videos from outside the detention facility
Just a reminder about who were the first to schedule a riot in Beit Lid
Another crazy video from the confrontations
A glimpse into the jail compound.

BTW, no one has been arrested so far.
Completely unprecedented scenes
Sorry, it wasn't "water cannons" the soldiers used, just a normal water hose 😂
The police claim it dispersed the protest "in a matter of minutes", and well, they're just lying. It's still going on.
The stream from the hose apparently hit a policeman in the face, injuring him.
Update Image
Security Minister Gallant calls on the police to act immediately.

At the moment, it seems like the Israeli Police is now officially Ben Gvir's Police.
Footage of the assault on Channel 13 news team
One thing I find staggering is that Israeli media channels still continue with their regular entertainment programs. As if nothing's going on.
Smotrich keeps inciting: Claims on Channel 14 that the Military Police is being forced to "call terrorists who were released to Gaza" to ask them if they have any complaint about their time in Israel's concentration camps. Image
Judeo-Nazi murderer and former spokesman for Jewish Power party, Elisha Yered, along with the suspects' lawyers, have started to spread the claim that the sodomized abductee was "a senior Hamas terrorist", supposedly a company commander from Jabaliya.

Google-Translate'd screenshot.Image
Image
And now they're gonna fight about who supports the army more. Unhinged.
Veteran Likud MK, supposedly from the "liberal" side of the party: Image
IDF Chief of General Staff Herzi Halevi arrived at the Beit Lid base.
Apparently deranged settler MK Limor Son Har Melekh is also in Beit Lid. Here we can see the crowd of rioters who just physically fought with soldiers a moment ago, applauding soldiers that arrived from Gaza.
One soldier was guarding the gate in Beit Lid 😂
Military Police officers have been attacked sporadically around the country and are now being ordered to conceal any marks identifying them as MPs.

IDF says the riots hurt the war efforts and that they had to stop preparations for the northern front due to the events.
Here's a video of Amichai Eliyahu chanting "death to terrorists", which everyone knows around here is just a euphemism for the classic Judeo-Nazi battle chant "death to Ar*bs"
Now that it's not prime time anymore, all the mainstream channels are back to news from Beit Lid.
Another so-called "liberal" from the Likud, Minister of Economy Nir Barkat, fighting for the right of IDF soldiers to sodomize Palestinians with complete impunity. Image
Sexual harasser and Netanyahu's mouthpiece Yinon Magal shared this disgusting abductee-rape joke on his Telegram channel: Image
OK, it's been a long fuckin' day and a long fuckin' thread. Good night. Image
New thread

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with B.M.

B.M. Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ireallyhateyou

B.M. Profile picture
Feb 3
🧵On the morning of October 7, 2023, long before becoming a "bodyguard" for genocide propagandists, and becoming a genocide propagandist himself, this Israeli Haverford Professor, Barak Mendelsohn, spilled some accidental truth. Image
A day later was some more truth. Image
But don't worry, he has straightened out since and aligned with the official genocidal Zionist lines. Image
Read 4 tweets
B.M. Profile picture
Jan 16
Guy Hochman isn't just an "Israeli soldier", he's a state-backed leading "comedian" propagadnist, an official promoter of the genocide. He went not just into Gaza but also into Syria, several times.

Don't let him come to your city. Image
Read 4 tweets
B.M. Profile picture
Dec 18, 2025
"We must boldly proclaim God's truth that the Land of Israel is ours because god said so"

Following are some more screenshots from the social media accounts of dead Chabad emissary, Rabbi Eli Schlanger, the so-called "Rabbi who preached peace" (per Novara Media).

In this post, from July 2024, Schlanger compares Arabs to Amalek, and then goes even further, and compares anti-genocide Jewish organizations to Amalek. To those Jews, at least, he offers a way out - "Teshuva", meaning to start obeying Jewish laws.

This is the kind of genocidal garbage he preached to his community. This is the kind of genocidal garbage Chabad preaches all over the world.Image
Receiving a "blessing" from a genocide army soldier in the occupied Western Wall Plaza (where the ancient Mughrabi Quarter stood before Zionists destroyed it in 1967) Image
"Jewish law says that being fearful in times of war is a sin and is dangerous" Image
Read 7 tweets
B.M. Profile picture
Dec 14, 2025
Just for context, the attack in Bondi Beach happened during a local Chabad event.

Chabad is a racist genocidal organization working as a literal foreign agent of Israel, all around the world. This organization should not be allowed to operate anywhere.
Read 9 tweets
B.M. Profile picture
Dec 12, 2025
🧵Haaretz did a cover interview with Alon-Lee Green, founder and leader of Israeli normalization movement Standing Together. Green described how he and his fellow Jewish activists celebrated the June 2024 Nuseirat "rescue mission" massacre, where about 300 (not just "more than 100") Palestinians were murdered by Israel, an event which apparently caused tension between the Palestinians ("Arabs") and the Jews in the group.Image
This part is quite revealing about Israel in general: despite Green being the movement's undisputed leader, only Palestinian members of the movement have ever been summoned to "warning talks" by the Israeli police and Shin Bet. Image
Green describes himself as "a patriot" and says that after October 7 he "Felt and urgent need to defend us, to defend our society, to fight for the hostages" (of course he's talking only about the Israeli "hostages") Image
Read 8 tweets
B.M. Profile picture
Dec 5, 2025
Yes, we need to talk about Jewish Supremacy.

Please take 10 minutes to read Chapter 6 of Israel Shahak's 1994 book Jewish History, Jewish Religion, titled "Political Consequences". It is simply mind-blowing to think it was written more than 30 years ago.
------
"The persistent attitudes of classical Judaism toward non-Jews strongly influence its followers, Orthodox Jews and those who can be regarded as its continuators, Zionists. Through the latter, it also influences the policies of the State of Israel.

Since 1967, as Israel becomes more and more 'Jewish', its policies are influenced more by Jewish ideological considerations than by those of a coldly conceived imperial interest. This ideological influence is not usually perceived by foreign experts, who tend to ignore or downplay the influence of the Jewish religion on Israeli policies. This explains why many of their predictions are incorrect.

In fact, more Israeli government crises are caused by religious reasons, often trivial, than by any other cause. The space devoted by the Hebrew press to discussion of the constantly occurring quarrels between the various religious groups, or between the religious and the secular, is greater than that given any other subject except in times of war or of security-related tension.

At the time of writing, early August 1993, some topics of major interest to readers of the Hebrew press are: whether soldiers killed in action who are sons of non-Jewish mothers will be buried in a segregated area in Israeli military cemeteries; whether Jewish religious burial associations, who have a monopoly over the burial of all Jews except kibbutz members, will be allowed to continue their custom of circumcising the corpses of non-circumcised Jews before burying them (and without asking the family's permission); whether the import of non-kosher meat to Israel, banned unofficially since the establishment of the state, will be allowed or banned by law. There are many more issues of this kind which are of a much greater interest to the Israeli Jewish public than, let us say, the negotiations with the Palestinians and Syria.

The attempts made by a few Israeli politicians to ignore the factors of 'Jewish ideology' in favour of purely imperial interests have led to disastrous results. In early 1974, after its partial defeat in the Yom Kippur War, Israel had a vital interest in stopping the renewed influence of the PLO, which had not yet been recognised by the Arab states as the solely legitimate representative of the Palestinians. The Israeli government conceived of a plan to support Jordanian influence in the West Bank, which was quite considerable at the time. When King Hussein was asked for his support, he demanded a visible quid pro quo. It was arranged that his chief West Bank supporter, Sheikh Jabri of Hebron, who ruled the southern part of the West Bank with an iron fist and with approval of then Defence minister Moshe Dayan, would give a party for the region's notables in the courtyard of his palatial residence in Hebron.

The party, in honour of the king's birthday, would feature the public display of Jordanian flags and would begin a pro-Jordanian campaign. But the religious settlers in the nearby Kiryat-Arba, who were only a handful at the time, heard about the plan and threatened Prime Minister Golda Meir and Dayan with vigorous protests since, as they put it, displaying a flag of a 'non-Jewish state' within the Land of Israel contradicts the sacred principle which states that this land 'belongs' only to Jews. Since this principle is accepted by all Zionists, the government had to bow to their demands and order Sheikh Jabri not to display any Jordanian flags. Thereupon Jabri, who was deeply humiliated, cancelled the party and, at the Fez meeting of the Arab League which occurred soon after, King Hussein voted to recognise the PLO as the sole representative of the Palestinians.

For the bulk of Israeli-Jewish public, the current negotiations about 'autonomy' are likewise influenced more by such Jewish ideological considerations than by any others. The conclusion from this consideration of Israeli policies, supported by an analysis of classical Judaism, must be that analyses of Israeli policy-making which do not emphasise the importance of its unique character as a 'Jewish state' must be mistaken. In particular, the facile comparison of Israel to other cases of Western imperialism or to settler states is incorrect.

During apartheid, the land of South Africa was officially divided into 87 per cent which 'belonged' to the whites and 13 per cent which was said officially to 'belong' to the Blacks. In addition, officially sovereign states, embodied with all the symbols of sovereignty, the so-called Bantustans, were established. But 'Jewish ideology' demands that no part of the Land of Israel can be recognised as 'belonging' to non-Jews and that no signs of sovereignty, such as Jordanian flags, can be officially allowed to be displayed. The principle of Redemption of the Land demands that ideally all the land, and not merely, say, 87 per cent, will in time be 'redeemed', that is, become owned by Jews.

'Jewish ideology' prohibits that very convenient principle of imperialism, already known to Romans and followed by so many secular empires, and best formulated by Lord Cromer: 'We do not govern Egypt, we govern the governors of Egypt.' Jewish ideology forbids such recognition; it also forbids a seemingly respectful attitude to any 'non-Jewish governors' within the Land of Israel. The entire apparatus of client kings, sultans, maharajas and chiefs, or, in more modern times, of dependent dictators, so convenient in other cases of imperial hegemony, cannot be used by Israel within the area considered part of the Land of Israel. Hence the fears, commonly expressed by Palestinians, of being offered a 'Bantustan' are totally groundless.

Only if numerous Jewish lives are lost in war, as happened both in 1973 and in the 1983–5 war aftermath in Lebanon, is an Israeli retreat conceivable, since it can be justified by the principle that the sanctity of Jewish life is more important than other considerations. What is not possible, as long as Israel remains a 'Jewish state', is the Israeli grant of a fake but nevertheless symbolically real sovereignty, or even of real autonomy, to non-Jews within the Land of Israel for merely political reasons. Israel, like some other countries, is an exclusivist state, but Israeli exclusivism is peculiar to itself.

In addition to Israeli policies, it may be surmised that the 'Jewish ideology' influences also a significant part, maybe a majority, of the diaspora Jews. While the actual implementation of Jewish ideology depends on Israel being strong, this in turn depends to a considerable extent on the support which diaspora Jews, particularly US Jews, give to Israel. The image of the diaspora Jews, and their attitudes to non-Jews, is quite different from the attitudes of classical Judaism, as described above. This discrepancy is most obvious in English-speaking countries, where the greatest falsifications of Judaism regularly occur. The situation is worst in the USA and Canada, the two states whose support for Israeli policies, including policies which most glaringly contradict the basic human rights of non-Jews, is strongest.

US support for Israel, when considered not in abstract but in concrete detail, cannot be adequately explained only as a result of American imperial interests. The strong influence wielded by the organised Jewish community in the USA in support of all Israeli policies must also be taken into account in order to explain the Middle East policies of American administrations. This phenomenon is even more noticeable in the case of Canada, whose Middle Eastern interests cannot be considered as important, but whose loyal dedication to Israel is even greater than that of the USA. In both countries (and also in France, Britain and many other states) Jewish organisations support Israel with about the same loyalty which communist parties accorded to the USSR for so long.

Also, many Jews who appear to be active in defending human rights and who adopt non-conformist views on other issues do, in cases affecting Israel, display a remarkable degree of totalitarianism and are in the forefront of the defence of all Israeli policies. It is well known in Israel that the chauvinism and fanaticism in supporting Israel displayed by organised diaspora Jews is much greater (especially since 1967) than the chauvinism shown by an average Israeli Jew. This fanaticism is especially marked in Canada and the USA, but because of the incomparably greater political importance of the USA, I will concentrate on the latter. It should, however, be noted that we also find Jews whose views of Israeli policies are not different from those held by the rest of the society (with due regard to the factors of geography, income, social position and so on).

Why should some American Jews display chauvinism, sometimes extreme, and others not? We should begin by observing the social and therefore also the political importance of the Jewish organisations which are of an exclusive nature: they admit no non-Jews on principle (this exclusivism is in amusing contrast with their hunt to condemn the most obscure non-Jewish club which refuses to admit Jews). Those who can be called 'organised Jews', and who spend most of their time outside work hours mostly in the company of other Jews, can be presumed to uphold Jewish exclusivism and to preserve the attitudes of classical Judaism to non-Jews. Under present circumstances, they cannot openly express these attitudes toward non-Jews in the USA, where non-Jews constitute more than 97 per cent of the population. They compensate for this by expressing their real attitudes in their support of the 'Jewish state' and the treatment it metes to the non-Jews of the Middle East.

How else can we explain the enthusiasm displayed by so many American rabbis in support of, let us say, Martin Luther King, compared with their lack of support for the rights of Palestinians, even for their individual human rights? How else can we explain the glaring contradiction between the attitudes of classical Judaism toward non-Jews, which include the rule that their lives should not be saved except for the sake of Jewish interest, with the support of the US rabbis and organised Jews for the rights of the Blacks? After all, Martin Luther King and the majority of American Blacks are non-Jews. Even if only the conservative and Orthodox Jews, who together constitute the majority of organised American Jews, are considered to hold such opinions about the non-Jews, the other part of organised US Jewry, the Reform, had never opposed them and, in my view, show themselves to be quite influenced by them.

Actually, the explanation of this apparent contradiction is easy. It should be recalled that Judaism, especially in its classical form, is totalitarian in nature. The behaviour of supporters of other totalitarian ideologies of our times was not different from that of the organised American Jews. Stalin and his supporters never tired of condemning the discrimination against the American or the South African Blacks, especially in the midst of the worst crimes committed within the USSR. The South African apartheid regime was tireless in its denunciations of the violations of human rights committed either by communist or by other African regimes, and so were its supporters in other countries. Many similar examples can be given.

The support of democracy or of human rights is therefore meaningless or even harmful and deceitful when it does not begin with self-critique and with support of human rights when they are violated by one's own group. Any support of human rights in general by a Jew which does not include the support of human rights of non-Jews whose rights are being violated by the 'Jewish state' is as deceitful as the support of human rights by a Stalinist. The apparent enthusiasm displayed by American rabbis or by the Jewish organisations in the USA during the 1950s and the 1960s in support of the Blacks in the South was motivated only by considerations of Jewish self-interest, just as was the communist support for the same Blacks. Its purpose in both cases was to try to capture the Black community politically, in the Jewish case to an unthinking support of Israeli policies in the Middle East.

Therefore, the real test facing both Israeli and diaspora Jews is the test of their self-criticism, which must include the critique of the Jewish past. The most important part of such a critique must be detailed and honest confrontation of the Jewish attitude to non-Jews. This is what many Jews justly demand from non-Jews: to confront their own past and so become aware of the discrimination and persecutions inflicted on the Jews. In the last 40 years, the number of non-Jews killed by Jews is by far greater than the number of the Jews killed by non-Jews. The extent of the persecution and discrimination against non-Jews inflicted by the 'Jewish state', with the support of organised diaspora Jews, is also enormously greater than the suffering inflicted on Jews by regimes hostile to them. Although the struggle against antisemitism (and of all other forms of racism) should never cease, the struggle against Jewish chauvinism and exclusivism, which must include a critique of classical Judaism, is now of equal or greater importance."
---------------------
PDF version of the book can be found here:
yplus.ps/wp-content/upl…
This idiot who believes herself to be a "progressive" compares me and Israel Shahak, a Holocaust survivor, to Nazis, because we dare face the thousand-year-old bigotry within the community and the religion we grew up in. Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(