🧵I've spent this year writing for the @newrepublic about how a group of Silicon Valley billionaires has gone WEIRD. Now their weirdness is mating up with Trump's MAGA weirdness in the 2024 election.
Here's a few things to understand about these guys.
#1: They despise democracy. These Trump-loving billionaires believe democracy is bad. They want to create their own corporate dictatorships called Network States. They are actively trying to build these weird little dictator cities all over the world. newrepublic.com/article/177733…
#2. They want control over existing governments. In addition to building weirdo colonies, they're also trying to capture existing governments. In San Francisco, a group of these tech zillionaires is trying to win control of City Hall ...(and now the USA!) newrepublic.com/article/178675…
3. They want to punish Democrats in weird ways. One of their main influencers has suggested that tech bros should form a "gray tribe," purge Democrats from San Francisco and build statues to remind people of how bad Democrats supposedly are... newrepublic.com/article/180487…
4. JD Vance is ONE OF THEM. Vance was literally put on Trump's ticket by the same group of people - Peter Thiel, David Sacks, Elon Musk, Marc Andreessen - who are behind all of the weirdness I've been writing about. newrepublic.com/article/183971…
5. Most newspaper analyses suggest that these tech authoritarians guys just want lower taxes and friendly regulations, but that's only part of the story. They have developed their own weird sci-fi influenced tech authoritarian IDEOLOGY.
It overlaps with MAGA in multiple ways.
6. MAGA/Tech overlaps:
- Collapse. They believe in an impending societal collapse.
- Messiah complex. They believe they alone can save humanity. They "alone can fix it."
- Supremacy. They share a believe in the supremacy of rich white (mostly straight) males over everyone else.
7. MAGA/Tech overlaps cont'd:
- Anti-Empathy. They abhor empathy/care.
- Anti-Public. They detest the idea of the public and seek to privatize most functions of government.
- Anti-Worker. They believe employers are superior to employees.
8. This is not an exhaustive list. But you can see here how many of the tech authoritarian goals align with MAGA. Antipathy toward taxes and regulations may be the root of their alliance, but there are many branches. But there are key ways in which tech diverges from MAGA...
9. For example, tech authoritarians see technology as being above God (if they even believe God exists). As tech founders and investors, they see themselves as the top of the hierarchy -- the masters of the universe. These beliefs have resulted in some strange sub-cults...
10. The Network State is one sub-cult -- the idea of replacing existing countries with tech-run countries.
Transhumanism is another -- a belief in merging with machines to obtain eternal life.
That's gonna sound pretty weird to fundamentalist Christians. . .
Lots of tech cults!
The tech billionaires behind Trump already have money. Now they want power -- to create their own countries, to change what it means to human, to control the fate of the world. Their interest is mainly *ideological,* not economic. Anyone saying otherwise has not done the reading.
This story by @davetroy goes deep into the weird collection of ideas called TESCREAL. Many of these tech guys backing Trump have been working on this project for a long, long time. washingtonspectator.org/understanding-…
Not all tech is bad! But a lot of people in Silicon Valley have been aware of this weirdness for a long time and have stayed quiet ... or agree with parts of it. With Thiel/Musk/Vance putting it on the Trump ticket, it's time to tune in. Because folks -- it's gonna get weirder.
Elon's little fake AI disinformation Kamala video was a just a taste of what's going to happen on this hellsite in 2024.
Anyhow. As you can see, I am workshopping a longer piece on tech authoritarian ideology. Open to suggestions and improvements.
Crypto plays a HUGE role in this weirdness. Just as they created new currencies to challenge existing currencies, they want to create new countries to challenge existing countries. It's all about power and control.
Some people refer to these tech authoritarians as
"The Nerd Reich."
That's also the name of my newsletter on this topic. Please subscribe -- it's paywall-free! thenerdreich.com/about/
Here is my interview with @parismarx on the @techwontsaveus podcast where I did the best job of explaining The Nerd Reich and these dangerously weird authoritarian tech bros.
And new interview coming soon on NPR! techwontsave.us/episode/221_te…
A company called "Frontier Valley" has declared it will build a new Network State zone on federal land in Alameda, California.
It published a "draft" presidential executive order that would declare a "national security emergency" to permit the project.
PR stunt, or...?
This is clearly a plan to tap in to Trump's promise to build 10 new corporate-run cities on federal land. But it seems like a strange way to announce it. This would extend Trump's "emergency" powers to create new tech-controlled zones on public land.
Why are Trump and his tech billionaire cronies trying to build new dystopian cities and "zones"?
It's a dangerous idea called "The Network State."
For @techpolicypress, I wrote about how the plan to sell "sovereignty" to the highest bidder is moving from theory to Praxis.
Welcome to the Network State vision:
Private, corporate-controlled cities that operate as "startup nations"—places where democracy, regulations, and taxes don't apply.
Think company towns, but with drone defense systems and unregulated biotech. techpolicy.press/trumps-gaza-fa…
Who backs these Network State ideas?
Marc Andreessen, Sam Altman, Peter Thiel, Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong, and Palmer Luckey.
Not fringe figures—these are the people reshaping global policy with venture capital and ideology. techpolicy.press/trumps-gaza-fa…
The New Yorker piece solidifies the connection between Curtis Yarvin & Balaji Srinivasan. That's crucial because Srinivasan took Yarvin's “patchwork” idea & reframed it as the Network State.
The Network State has public support from Marc Andreessen, Sam Altman, and this guy ⬇️
Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong is an enthusiastic supporter of the Network State cult (he even spoke at the conference).
And the Network State is a light repackaging of a core Yarvin idea: societies ruled by corporations. newrepublic.com/article/185738…
Armstrong speaks openly of the need to create post-democratic societies.
Sam Altman is funding Praxis, which seeks to build a Network State city in the Middle East (or in Greenland).
The Network State people are pushing the Trump "Freedom Cities" thing.
Rehashed Yarvin.
Some people don't think Yarvin is important. They are wrong.
But his value is not in his genius, which does not exist.
He's the guy who says what fascist billionaires want to hear.
Their embrace of the *ideas* he spouts — despite his unhinged persona — is the scary part.
Elon Musk's plan to build his own city in Texas echoes the Network State cult, which seeks to create dystopian cities and states ruled by billionaires.