Algeria's Imane Khelif has just beat Italy's Angela Carini in the Olympic Women's 66kg Boxing Preliminaries.
Carini forfeited the match in the first round.
Khelif was previously disqualified from a women's boxing championship for having "XY chromosomes."
(Continued from above)
Yesterday, the International Boxing Association released an eleventh hour statement which definitively established that Khelif was not eligible to compete in women's boxing.
Khelif, along with Taiwan's Lin Yu-Ting, had been previously disqualified from the 2023 Women's Boxing World Championship after it was determined they had an unfair advantage over female boxers.
And while supporters and national Olympic Committees claimed this was simply because the boxers had "naturally high testosterone," the IBA put this myth to bed and confirmed they had not conducted a testosterone level test on either one of them.
Instead, the IBA said that Khelif and Lin had been disqualified after a separate medical test was conducted which established they were not eligible to participate in women's boxing.
Crucially, the IBA defines "woman" as "an individual with XX chromosomes." The "gender tests" they conduct on boxers do not measure their hormone levels, but determines whether they meet this definition of "woman" as per the IBA eligibility criteria.
Khelif and Lin did not.
Yet despite this, the @iocmedia has allowed both to compete in women's boxing at Paris 2024. While some may believe the IOC conducted their own medical tests, this is untrue. The IOC ceased all sex-testing in 1999. And for the purposes of the Paris Olympics, the eligibility for women's boxing has been limited to whether an individual has legal documents stating they are female.
Reduxx will be clear for a final time: Khelif and Lin are NOT believed to be transgender. Instead, they are believed to be individuals impacted by a Difference of Sexual Development, a medical condition which results in the abnormal development of secondary sex characteristics.
Individuals impacted by some DSDs, for example, may have XY chromosomes, but not develop a penis in utero. Thus, they are marked as "female" when they are born, and may go a substantial part of their lives without knowing they are biologically male.
In the past, male athletes with DSDs have been actively sought out by national Olympic teams because they have a substantial advantage over females and can fly "under the radar" thanks to their "female" legal documentation.
But individuals with XY chromosomes, no matter their secondary sex characteristics or medical conditions, are still male. And they should not be competing against females.
@iocmedia was and has been aware of concerns surrounding Khelif and Lin's biological sex, yet has been allowing them to continue compete against females.
This is putting female athletes at serious risk. It is also crushing the dreams of female Olympians like Angela Carini, who earned their place in their sport.
🚨UPDATE🚨
The International Boxing Association has released a SECOND statement reiterating that Lin and Khelif were "not eligible to compete within the female category" and condemning the Olympics for not protecting female boxers.
"The IBA will never support any boxing bouts between the genders, as the organization puts the safety and well-being of our athletes first. We are protecting our women and their rights to compete in the ring against equal rivals, and we will defend and support them in all instances; their hopes and dreams must never be taken away by organisations unwilling to do the right thing under difficult circumstances."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🚨The @CommunityNotes is completely incorrect, and appears to have been written by a political operative who has been spamming every related post on the issue with the same misinformation.
While some in the Bundestag claimed their intention was to prevent innocent CSAM reporters from being accidentally prosecuted, the law did not single them out for amnesty.
It is a wholesale reduction in the penalties associated with the distribution, possession, or acquisition of child pornography.
Not just for those innocently reporting CSAM, but for everyone charged with the distribution, possession, or acquisition of child pornoraphy.
If the Bundestag wanted to provide legal pathways to prevent those innocently reporting CSAM to authorities from being caught up in a legal web -- it could have done that.
Instead, it passed a broad-sweeping bill to drop these charges to a petty misdemeanor.
The overwhelming majority of those who will benefit are pedophiles, hence the opposition this bill received from German child safeguarding groups and the German political opposition.
As always, ALL of Reduxx's articles are extensively sourced (with hyperlinks made available in the article), and this particular piece was written in collaboration with German safeguarding advocates who provided all of the translations we used.
And because we seem to be in the habit of upsetting German politicians tonight, let's continue!
In November of 2023, Reduxx reported that Germany's parliament had accepted a petition on "children's rights" drafted by a convicted pedophile:
Over the past two years, Reduxx has conducted multiple in-depth investigations into the World Professional Association for Transgender Health.
What we found was a pattern of WPATH academics rubbing shoulders with pedophiles and fetishists.
1/5🧵
In 2022, Reduxx released the findings of a months-long investigation into WPATH's connection to a "eunuch" forum hosting graphic child sexual torture fantasies.
Despite being fully aware of the contents of this forum, WPATH revised its guidelines to accommodate recommendations from its members.