Today I'm reading the outrage about the Olympic boxing match between Italian Angela Carini and Algerian Imane Khelif. People are screaming about a "biological male" competing in women's sports. So let's talk about intersexuality, because it's critically relevant here. /1🧵
2/ Here's the thing: Khelif has been a woman her entire life, and barring genetic testing, would never be doubted as a woman had she not so effectively punched a fellow woman in the face in a boxing ring.
3/ From what I read, it sounds like she's intersexed, being diagnosed with the presence of XY chromosomes despite female genitalia. Nobody in her youth doubted her womanhood.
So: Does God make mistakes?
4/ This controversy should cast the intersex phenomenon into stark relief, in this season of trans panic. Khelif is not trans; she's simply one of surprisingly many people with medically ambiguous gender characteristics.
5/ And therein lies the problem for conservatives: BIOLOGY IS NOT BINARY. It never has been, despite what conservatives insist.
6/ When I finally became aware of the intersex phenomenon a few years ago, it was the first crack in my anti-LGBTQ armor, because I realized for the first time that my carefully-curated sense of certainty about male-female-and-nothing-else was scientifically impossible.
7/ So here we have the first very highly-visible case of intersex that I've ever seen, and the right wing is unsurprisingly turning it into trans panic, because in their tiny mental box, they cannot possibly admit that this woman with XY chromosomes might not be trans.
8/ They simply MUST force it into their binary box, or they'd have to admit a flaw in their worldview, and that would be devastating to their theology.
Because: God does NOT make mistakes.
Or so they've said for generations.
9/ But suddenly they have to admit that God made an intersex person, who has XY chromosomes and can take out a boxing opponent in just 46 seconds, yet was legitimately born with a vulva instead of a penis and raised from birth as a woman.
10/ No artificial hormones or surgery were involved in making Khelif the woman she is today.
So... what is a woman?
Suddenly that question takes on more reality than they've ever wanted to admit.
11/ If she was born with a vulva, raised as a woman, and now they're saying she's a "he", they just had to admit that "what is a woman" is in fact a very valid and relevant question, and maybe it has much more complexity than whether someone sits or stands to pee.
12/ And it turns out that the answer isn't a simple matter of biology or genetics, is it?
13/ To wrap this up: intersex is a very complex topic, both scientifically and socially, but it deserves careful attention, and it devastates the simplistic binary conservative arguments about gender and sexuality.
14/ And this is an opportunity to educate people gently but effectively.
If you want to learn more, let me recommend a few resources.
15/ First, my detailed "Cliff Notes" book review of a dissertation by Megan DeFranza, "Intersex and Imago: Sex, Gender, and Sexuality in Postmodern Theological Anthropology" can be found at crucibleofthought.com/review-of-inte…
16/ Megan DeFranza went on to develop that dissertation into a full book, "Sex Difference in Christian Theology: Male, Female, and Intersex in the Image of God" which is an excellent resource.
17/ Second, I'll point you to my personal reading list, with short book reviews and Amazon links, on the gender and sexuality topic here: crucibleofthought.com/book-reviews-s…
18/ There are a few really good books on intersex, especially "Intersexion," which puts onto the topic a personal face and a set of personal stories.
19/ Closing thought: educate yourself. Understand intersex, so that you can help educate others. It could provide the first crack in their anti-affirming ramparts. And even if not, they'll finally understand that creation is more diverse than they expected or admitted.
What people want, versus what is. Life is beautifully complex; learn to love the complexity and you'll discover amazing and lovely things hidden in the diversity all around you.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We just watched the American church wearing purple and scarlet, standing in front of the beast she had long feared, and collectively decide, "I really think we can tame that thing." It really is that simple: she wanted power and riches, and the beast offered exactly that. /1🧵
2/ I don't think Revelation is literal prophecy. I don't believe a Rapture is just around the corner. But Revelation is full of really good insight into humanity's relationship between religion and empire, and the principles apply each time those two intersect.
3/ For a few decades now, evangelicals have been slowly and steadily building a coalition, and establishing a rationale for controlling American society. They've indoctrinated their followers into important belief systems. They've found levers that give them power.
They're already setting up the conditions to remove him from office via the 25th Amendment shortly after he takes office. But it's a long game. If they move too fast, MAGA will revolt. So they have to take it very very slowly and carefully. /1🧵 newyorker.com/magazine/2024/…
2/ So they will start slowwwwly letting his supporters know everything that his opponents know and have been screaming about - but things that were very carefully hidden from MAGA by their echo chamber media. On right wing media, all they see is a perfect demigod.
3/ And just like Roosevelt's paralysis, the truth won't be evident to them for a loooong time to come, if ever. But they've got to do it slowly enough that his MAGA supporters don't realize they were lied to for the last year or more - they can't afford MAGA to feel betrayed.
3-1/2 years ago, on 1/10/2021, my then-pastor preached a vehement message criticizing us for not listening to the prophetic voices telling us that Trump had won the 2020 election, that we needed to trust God, not our own knowledge. I now see spiritual abuse in that message, /1🧵
2/ a gaslighting of our God-given conscience and deeply rational outrage about the absolute evil we'd just watched consume the Capitol, with God's name on the lips of the rioters. The pastor's insistence that our spiritual fitness was dependent on listening to a chorus
3/ of self-appointed, self-deceived "holy men" whose disconnection from the true voice of God galls me to this day, and led directly to me leaving that church, and soon abandoning evangelicalism. My deep concern, with Trump 2024, is the fresh crystallization of this abuse
Why I voted for Kamala Harris as a Christian: After four intensive years of rethinking my doctrines and politics, I have concluded that my former right-wing positions on abortion, LGBTQ, racism, 2A, welfare, climate, and immigration were WRONG. Specifically: /1🧵
2/ For months in 2022 I studied abortion intensively, and for my own purposes I wrote a 53-page paper on "A personal framework for the morality of abortion" and in 2024 a 33-page paper on "Studies on the best ways to reduce abortions." Banning abortion is counterproductive; pro-choice, in all its complexity, is (perhaps paradoxically) in fact the best way to reduce abortion. Furthermore, the anti-abortion position is inherently harmful to huge numbers of women and families, and violates many things that pro-life people claim to value. You can find my papers linked here: crucibleofthought.com/studies-on-the…
3/ In 2022 I studied gay rights and homosexuality and transgender issues at length, and wrote a 36-page paper about my findings. I and concluded that (contrary to evangelical teaching) the Bible does not teach that homosexuality or gay rights are wrong. Furthermore, I concluded that the anti-affirming position results in vast and deep harm to many people, including far too many suiçides and self-harm by people in unsupportive situations. Responses about the personal or societal harm supposedly caused by the gay or trans agenda are utterly unconvincing, and I've found them to be universally mistaken or outright deceptive, not to mention quite unChristian in their use of falsehoods in pursuit of an religious agenda. You can find my paper here: crucibleofthought.com/coming-out-on-…
Each time I post something about leaving the Republican Party after voting twice for Trump, I get a ton of questions asking how I could have been so dumb. I get the incredulity; I wonder the same thing. But I think the question is asked in good faith, so here's my answer. /1🧵
2/ First, the short version: I grew up SO Republican that I never thought there was a real honest alternative. And Trump scratched my itch for seeing Christians take over the reins of government. But January 6th broke me: I was unwilling to be associated with that. So, details:
3/ I was born into a VERY Republican extended family. My earliest political memory was attending a 1980 rally and watching candidate Ronald Reagan promote his exciting vision for America, talking about all the amazing things he would do for our nation. It was intoxicating.
I continue to be flabbergasted by the seemingly gleeful spread of misinformation and outright lies by the right. I was a Republican party-line voter from my very first vote for George HW Bush, straight through to voting twice for Trump (to my DEEP regret). But NEVER AGAIN. /1🧵
2/ All those years, we Republicans told ourselves that WE were the party of truth and law and order and respect for the Constitution. We constantly ridiculed Democrats as liars, hypocrites, who would say anything to buy votes, do anything to steal elections, who hated America.
3/ We Republicans proudly told ourselves that God was on our side, because we were SO devoted to truth and righteousness. We rejected the idea that it was even POSSIBLE to be Christian and a Democrat at the same time, we were so certain that God was with us.