Broader employment data suggests the swift rise in the UE rate is an outlier and that the labor market remains pretty tight with only very gradually cooling.
If labor markets aren't weakening fast, the Fed has little urgency to deliver all those expected cuts.
Thread.
While the UE rate gets a lot of attention, it by no means the only read on employment conditions. By this point, we have a pretty good set of data thru Jul.
ADP private jobs data has been in roughly the same range for a year and recent data in line with last summer.
For all the noise about an uptick in claims measures, IC is basically at the same level as last summer and CC is 6bps of labor force higher. This may also be overstated by one-off issues not well captured by seasonal adj (TX hurricane, late MI retooling, MN ed).
Challenger job layoff announcements posted their lowest numbers in a while (and very low on an outright basis).
That's consistent with the layoffs figures that we've seen from JOLTS (a month lagged thru Jun) which moved down to multi-year lows.
And in line with hiring plans from NFIB (thru June) are pretty stable over the last year and ticked up a tad in recent months.
This stability contrasts with other measures of hiring which suggests a bit more weakness. Though if the hiring rate was really this poor, we'd expect to see a much greater rise in continuing claims than we have so far.
Mega bears love the ISM manufacturing employment gauge being down to Sept 2008 levels. While they take it as a true sign of collapse, anyone who lived through '08 knows that this just indicates that the survey doesn't pass the common sense test and should be ignored.
Overall we are also seeing signs of some modest easing of pressure on wages as the incremental bid for employment has slowed. But across most measures, demand and wage growth remains elevated vs. pre-covid levels.
Openings have come down but are above '20 and for a few months:
The most comprehensive measure of wage growth - ECI - had a soft print for 2Q for the important wages and salaries line (most spending happens from income), though its a bit of an outlier relative to stronger quarters before. Either way, clearly above pre-covid.
The ADP pay insights numbers suggest very gradual slowing, with a bit of a tick down in July particularly with lower-income cohorts (here proxied by age). Still above pre-covid levels of growth, particularly for lower income earners.
This suggests that even though labor market demand may be in the ballpark of pre-covid levels, pressures on nominal wage growth may persist given that wage income remains pretty depressed in real terms relative to pre-covid levels. Aways to go on this "catch up" for workers:
Reports today are just one lens into what is going on with labor market conditions and these other reports help triangulate the picture. Like the overall growth measures, most employment measures show only modest cooling. The UE rate may be the outlier:
The Fed responds to the macro data, and typically aggressive easing cycles only come when there is (or a relatively extreme expectation of) deterioration in the labor market. The broad set of data looks consistent with JP's views of gradual cooling and normalization.
Hopes that swift cuts are coming because of a fast labor market deterioration are unlikely to come true given the data and likely trajectory at this point.
And for many investors, hopes of those fast cuts are all that is propping up the stock market at this point.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Seen rising toxicity over the 3yrs I've been active, accelerating post election.
Not just more trolls and politically motivated folks. Sad to see more large accounts focus on scoring points and ginning up mob attacks vs being collaborative & supportive (even with disagreement).
What was a vibrant community of interaction is slowing decaying to individual silos & marketing posts b/c its the rational thing to do. Everyone worse off for it.
Particularly the silent majority of folks who passively consume the content here and learn from the interactions.
I know it creates a feeling of superiority to join (or create) a tribe here & attack when others disagree or have been wrong, sometimes mercilessly.
But for anyone who cares about a vibrant fintwit community, those folks are a destructive cancer dressed up as 'accountability.'
A broad look at the inflation data suggests price pressures continue to rise as disinflationary benefits like housing moderate and price pressures from tariffs flow through.
Thread.
The US still has an inflation problem and the inflation impulse from rising tariffs is not helping the situation. Core PCE numbers reported a couple weeks ago remain almost 100bps above the Fed target and are set to march higher in coming quarters.
The CPI release brought our first read of official inflation data for July. A scan of other inflation triangulations suggests the inflation reality isn't looking good (even though expectations are contained). Will this translate into the actual reported data?
Anyone take a look at this Situation Awareness fund getting all the press? A client asked me so I took a look.
Claims 47% net returns YTD when 2 large 12/31/24 13F positions (MRVL & VRT) were down 44% & 36% and article claims limited short positions.
If you just take their 13F filings and estimate the monthly returns of their holdings you get something that looks like this below, which nets out much closer to 0% return YTD. Seems like an ok proxy since holdings didn't change that much over the quarter.
Portfolio definitely had winners in the 3/31/25 13F mix, but would have had to have way out of the money calls on INTC (making notional near zero value) and flawless timing on the winners (and/or lots of shorts alpha) to get close given disappointing 1Q picks.
Despite the political euphoria that's come from passing the BBB, netting out the impacts of immigration and tariffs under either current or likely policy suggests a negative shock to growth in coming quarters.
Thread.
Federal government policies are typically reactive to underlying conditions in the private sector and so while they can be important influences on growth, they rarely drive substantial growth pressures as a standalone.
The magnitude and direction of the policy suite from the new administration is relatively unusual - creating a large pressure on growth somewhat independent of what was happening in the rest of the economy (which was a pretty boring late cycle deceleration).
When most portfolios are long only, flexible strategies that can go short to cushion negative return periods are uniquely diversifying.
The challenge is finding cash efficient, low cost, positive return strategies that do it. Managed Futures run at 2x is an option.
Thread.
Allocators often face challenges designing portfolios that can help limit losses in down market environments. Despite the need, there are few investment offerings that perform well when other assets underperform but don’t have burdensome drag on the portfolio over time.
Some folks use buffer products, but those are often structured in a way that can limit upside. Others add out of the money puts, but that often results in meaningful negative return drag over time as premiums go unused.
For years the housing market has almost levitated despite drags from high rates and high prices thanks to limited supply and other assets financing demand. But in recent months that's started to flip.
The housing market has been much more resilient in recent years than most had expected in the face of very high rates. The biggest reason for that was that while buying demand dried up following the post-covid surge in rates, so too did supply.
In the last 6 months or so both have shifted to be more negative for prices. Inventory of new and existing homes have picked up while the slowing of asset prices combined with still high mortgage rates has caused buying demand to hit new lows.