The question might seem trivial, but give it a moment’s thought:
Why does Venice 🇮🇹 float?
What does it rest on?
And, most importantly, why doesn’t it sink?
A Thread🧵 to explain it to you
It seems to float above the lagoon, but in reality, it emerges from the waters thanks to its foundations.
Yes, because Venice is built on wooden piles, which is why it is also known as the "upside-down forest”.
How is it possible that, despite the passage of time, these very piles, driven into the sediment of the lagoon, have not deteriorated?
Let's find out together as we retrace the history of this revolutionary engineering project.
Tradition holds that Venice was founded on March 25, 421 AD.
It is astonishing to realize that for centuries, its foundations - thousands of wooden piles driven into the ground and immersed in water - have not rotted.
The technique used is called "pile-driving," which replaced the natural seabed with an artificial one, formed by a dense network of piles (about 9 per square meter), with diameters ranging from 10 to 25 cm and lengths extending from one meter to three and a half meters.
They marked the area destined for the foundation of the new palace with two series of parallel pile foundations, 80 cm apart. These are the so-called perimeter indirect foundations.
Depending on natural resistance to atmospheric agents and water, as well as availability in the area, various types of wood were chosen, from oak (dense and resistant, better suited to bearing heavy loads and withstanding harsh environmental conditions) to fir, larch, and pine (known for their hardness and durability).
The piles were driven into the ground by percussion, a technique typical of driven piles, literally hammered into the ground, ensuring excellent resistance through lateral friction with the soil.
To ensure the right solidity, a support layer (about 50 cm thick) was placed above the piles, consisting of layers of planking or stone.
One of the main reasons the wooden piles do not rot is the anoxic environment (devoid of oxygen) in which they are located. When wood is completely submerged in water and mud, it is deprived of oxygen: this causes the microorganisms that decompose wood to die, as they need oxygen to survive and proliferate.
Another key factor is the process of mineralization. Over time, minerals present in the water and surrounding soil penetrate the wooden piles, making them harder and increasing their longevity and resistance to decomposition.
Finally, the role of mud, which not only acts as a cushion, evenly distributing the weight of the city above the piles and preventing structural failures but is also rich in fine sediments that form a protective layer around the piles, further isolating them from oxygen and microorganisms.
Over the centuries, Venice has benefited from continuous maintenance work and engineering interventions to ensure the stability of its foundations.
Today, thanks to technological advancements, it is possible to monitor and replace deteriorated piles, ensuring the safety and durability of the structures.
Despite all this, erosion and wear are inevitable, and thus, from time to time, even Venice yields.
When we wander joyfully through Venice, let's never forget what lies beneath our feet.
It's a gesture of love and awareness.
Venice is beautiful, but let's remember that it suffers, and it won't be there forever... In fact, some are quite pessimistic about its disappearance.
If you have enjoyed this thread, please be kind enough to share it.
It has been created with love, respect, and the hope that the world's most unique city may endure forever.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The North–South Economic Divide in Italy: Historical, Economic, and Socio-Cultural Causes
The economic divide between Northern Italy (regions such as Lombardy, Veneto, Piedmont) and the South (the Mezzogiorno, including Campania, Apulia, Basilicata, Calabria, Sicily, and Sardinia) is one of the most persistent structural problems in Italian history.
Despite the unification of 1861, today the southern per-capita GDP stands at roughly 58–60% of that of the Centre-North, with unemployment rates twice as high (over 20% in the South versus 6–8% in the North) and a dependence on state subsidies that has generated a vicious circle of welfare dependency.
This imbalance is not innate but arises from a complex interplay of historical, economic, socio-cultural, and other factors (geographical, political, institutional).
Below is an exhaustive analysis—based on historical and economic studies—showing how the gap pre-existed the Unification but dramatically widened in the decades that followed.
Explanation Part 2
Historical Causes
The roots of the divide go back thousands of years, accentuated by unification and by dynamics of “internal colonialism.”
Before unification (that is, prior to 1861), the North benefited from autonomous development: the Lombard invasion (6th century) fostered the rise of medieval city-states (10th–13th centuries), which developed a mercantile and proto-industrial bourgeoisie and became integrated into European trade routes.
By contrast, the South was dominated by foreign monarchies (Normans, Swabians, Angevins, Spaniards, Bourbons), which imposed a centralized feudal system marked by unproductive latifundia and a lack of local autonomy.
The Kingdom of the Two Sicilies (1816–1861) had a primitive agrarian economy plagued by endemic malaria, deforestation, and poor irrigation, despite abundant natural resources; per-capita GDP was similar to or slightly higher than that of the North (according to Daniele and Malanima), yet the infrastructural gaps were enormous: 14,700 km of roads compared to 75,500 in the North, and only 184 km of railways versus more than 2,300.
The unification of 1861 imposed the Piedmontese model (centralist and liberalist), treating the South as an “internal colony”: southern resources financed northern debt (which had risen by 565% before 1860) and the “industrial triangle” (Turin–Milan–Genoa).
This led to brigantaggio (1860–1870), a peasant revolt suppressed by 120,000 soldiers under martial law (the Pica Law, 1863), which alienated the South from the nascent state and perpetuated hostility.
In the twentieth century, the First World War (1915–1918) channelled industrial contracts to the North, while Fascism (1922–1943) invested in southern infrastructure (e.g. the Apulian aqueduct) but in a clientelistic manner, without structural reform.
The Second World War devastated the South (Allied bombings, mafia-US alliances), and the post-war economic boom (1950–1970) industrialized the North through the Marshall Plan, leaving the Mezzogiorno largely agrarian.