Jason Kint Profile picture
Aug 8, 2024 33 tweets 13 min read Read on X
wow. an amazing 325 page google strategy document quietly unsealed buried in google antitrust docket. It's gonna take a long thread but I have pulled out the gems. It's from 2017 planning, no doubt Google will just say these were only ideas but many will look very familiar. /1 Image
For more than a decade, Google has been shifting revenue away from rest of the web to its own properties where it doesn't have to share any of it (I share a chart every earnings backing this up). But here it is spelled out by their own employees as the intentional strategy. /2 Image
In a sea of project code names, "Narnia 2.0" is all over this document. The great Julia Angwin reported late in 2016 on how Google changed its policy merging users' anonymous browsing with PII and search activity creating a single profile/cookie. Now read the yellow highlight. /3 Image
Google pitched it as simplifying privacy settings enabling a single opt-out interface for users. Now note these docs suggest real goal was to be tracking 1B users by 2017 at <20% opt-out rate.
It was their goal to convert users to tracking (which most Google users don't want). /4 Image
People too often think Google's analytics and network ad biz are just bolt-on, small businesses. Not the case, the goal was to create essentially a walled garden of the entire web with persistent PII and tracking across our entire lives. "Our New Network" as they stated here. /5 Image
Project Narnia2 allowed for a single look across web and G properties. "LTV" came up in the search lawsuit they just lost as allowing to manipulate auctions by not solely using bid price. Here it appears this allowed them to shift revenue to gmail where they keep 100%. /6 Image
Where Google may argue they are the caretaker of the open web, that’s a lie. It’s been evident over the years they dominate discovery, design, data collection and monetization in a way that they can make sure they rarely lose. User trust can't be bound by revenue neutrality. /7 Image
For the news orgs and journalists who have been working to find a sustainable business model supported by your audiences, you need to know Google in this strategy document puts subscriptions (eg FT, WSJ) under the heading of "Threats to the Open Web." /8 Image
Not only does Google look at subscriptions in the doc as a threat to them and the open web but they also see privacy as a competitive threat...to surveillance. "These actors can inhibit our ability...to use identity to improve the quality of ads, constraining our business." /9 Image
"Publishers may give us data..." is how Google describes its surveillance across a majority of webpages, mobile phones, locations, as you browse the web. When GDPR rolled out, Google famously gave no other options. They are data thiefs imho. /10 Image
Let's just say I am super interested in the "remaining 20% whitelisted" here. A reminder Facebook's whitelisting of partners while under consent decree was a part of why it ended up in a $5B settlement. /11 Image
We've done our own research on how users feel about Google tracking them across the web (see Chrome sync) and Android. Read the yellow closely and you tell me how you feel about this two-time monopolist surveillance capitalist you can't avoid. /12 Image
Ever wonder why agencies and major advertisers rarely cross Google? At adtech antitrust trial 9/9, expect major agencies and advertisers are chilled by Google. Why? They may get special data privileges from Google. eg here appears to be P&G, Omincom. x-device? /13 Image
On the adtech antitrust trial, google will try to drive a narrative that they can just jettison a part of their network ad stack but reality is, on top of the surveillance data we've noted, Google also notes the strategic advantages (eg blend higher quality inventory). /14 Image
I will be shocked if this isn't an exhibit during trial (if it's not then they just have too much evidence),
"solve operational efficiency...and capture a portion of the value as higher fees, improvising overall margins."
"only possible when you control both buy & sell sides" /15 Image
So this bit here will undermine Google's argument that owning the entire stack makes advertising much better. Google states very clearly despite its own ubiquitous role, "Advertising is failing consumers, failing publishers, and failing advertisers." /16 Image
They say the quiet part out loud again, "we've implemented few standards for ad experiences beyond spam and fraud detection..." One may ask whether that is because they make more margin by a web driven by microtargeting users without the lower margins of quality experiences. /17 Image
Unless they can leverage youtube to shift brand spend intentionally. Google had some bad news reports earlier in the year for running major brands across their network including some really toxic sites - some even sanctioned if I recall correctly. /18 Image
A couple fun ones. For the folks who recall CBA - claimed to be an industry-wide, organic effort to improve ad experiences as a response to ad blocking. It turns out it was a Google-originated project. I'm fairly certain this document pre-dates the pitch from Venable. /19 Image
For those who know Richard Gingras, who served as a front man to the news industry protecting Google for more than a decade. He also ran their free news site with no ads that aggregated the rest of the web. Apparently still "struggling to build a compelling property." /20 Image
DOJ had to laugh at this exhibit (it came over from the Texas AG lawsuit) as Google repeatedly tried to suggest "the marketing funnel" wasn't a thing any more in the search trial it just lost. Their own people describe it right here. So it must be a thing. /21 Image
On a last funny note, all the docs in this thread, just came out as Google tried to keep an expert witness out of the trial by arguing "open web display advertising" is not actually a thing. Unfortunately for them they use the term all over these documents! I know, comical. /22 Image
One other more recent 2020 document includes some interesting charts including this one again showing how Google dominates all sides of the market. /23 Image
They also were clearly concerned about two projects called "Swiss Knife" which they would actually go in and terminate publishers from their adsense network. That plus ITP (Apple's privacy protection) had caused a 6% revenue hit apparently. /24 Image
Here is a link to the 300+ page strategy document. The adtech geeks should enjoy it. /25 storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
A few other docs. Google's 2022 assessment of Apple's plans in its ads biz. In the comments, two years ago, it expects to essentially lose the basis of its lawsuit (buying off Apple for search traffic). They estimate this as 15% of APPL profits. /26 storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
Our Canadian friends may appreciate this 2021 document analyzing Google's programmatic business north of the border including the critical trojan horse of GA4 to enable user consent if privacy laws advance. /27 storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
Monopoly much. /28 Image
Sort of fun to see Facebook working to scramble in a statement and send background information to the NYT to deal with rising news reporting on the "duopoly" and potential harms of their market power. Oops. /29 storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
January 2019 Display Highlights from inside of Google. These are the docs showing revenues, and profits, migrating to the O&O properties. This has been a trend for more than a decade. I don't believe it's anything but intentional. /30 storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
Now one for my European friends. A whole lot of interesting analysis and internal strategy discussion for display biz in here post-GDPR. /31 storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Image
Here is a link to the @JuliaAngwin report I referenced early on about merging PII with anonymous browsing which I am now fairly certain is the “Project Narnia 2.0” in the document. I expect this to come up at trial for sure. /32 propublica.org/article/google…
@JuliaAngwin over and out. hopefully this was useful in getting some of this info into public interest as we’re approaching Sept 9th where we’ll need to have as many independent adtech minds and journalists covering the details of the approaching $300B Twice Monopolist juggernaut. /33 /eof

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Kint

Jason Kint Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jason_kint

Dec 31, 2024
The secret deal (aka "Project Jedi Blue") between Google and Facebook has finally been unsealed in district court tonight. Link in text tweet. /1 Image
Here is a link to the full 48 pages of the agreement. /2 storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Here is how NYT reported it in the complaint. Google and Facebook suggested it was misrepresented. Their proxies have misled public into thinking it was dismissed from lawsuit despite Google's CEO being deposed about it only months ago. /3 nytimes.com/2021/01/17/tec…
Read 5 tweets
Dec 31, 2024
woah. ~300 redacted summary judgment google exhibits posted in TX. I've uploaded all. most eye-popping - we finally get Google-Facebook contract (aka Jedi Blue) alleged as bid rigging (yes, press was misled, it's still part of the claims). /1 Image
If you need a definition for Match Rate, Google and Facebook include it with example of using the "encrypted blob" on mobile, feels very much like a fingerprint y'all. Here is the full contract, don't sleep on section dealing with monopoly enforcement. /2 storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…Image
There are a ton of new exhibits from discovery with similar themes of Google secretly using projects to manipulate its black box auctions. "The first rule of Bernanke is we don't talk about Bernanke." /3 Image
Image
Read 20 tweets
Dec 20, 2024
Justice takes time. What he knew when. AOC will remember this, “Their lawsuit says Zuckerberg—facing the risk of personal liability over the data privacy scandal—got himself out of trouble by agreeing to pay a larger-than-necessary $5 billion fine with shareholder money.” 1/3 Image
Here is the full report from Bloomberg on Zuckerberg’s deposition which apparently was cut short and late on docs on Dec 3rd. Board members Thiel, Andreessen, others all being deposed these weeks. Press allowed Facebook to rewrite history on this. 2/3 news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-p…
Here is a good thread that will get you into the details. Sheryl Sandberg also deposed although her assumed prior SEC deposition was sealed. We did finally get Zuckerberg’s which showed his nerves and that the scandal was on his mind much earlier. Thanks to @zamaan_qureshi 3/3
Read 4 tweets
Dec 17, 2024
Overnight: FTC plans to call CEO Zuckerberg and (former) CTO Schroepfer in first 2 wks of trial (late April) in DC seeking to break up the company for abuse of monopoly laws. Also on their short list are some very big roles and names. Very likely driving behaviors at the top. /1 Image
As I know their roles...
Chris Cox - chief product officer who took a break when scandals accelerated, and avoided testimony in UK.
Javier Olivan - now COO, key lieutenant
Sheryl Sandberg - former COO, on everything
Alex Schultz - key growth hacker, now CMO /2
Adam Mosseri - key lieutenant, now runs Insta
Dave Wehner - former CFO, deal approval including $19B with no real revenue WhatsApp
Fidji Simo - (former) always in mix, product leadership
Guy Rosen - Onavo alleged packet sniffing of WhatsApp, Snap /3
Read 4 tweets
Dec 10, 2024
Woah. Google filed redacted versions of its Summary Judgment exhibits in Texas adtech antitrust case ahead of the March 31 trial. Although this case mirrors DOJ's case awaiting decision, it has even more eye-popping evidence. And an expert suggesting $29B in penalties. /1 Image
"Project Bernanke" is an oldie but goodie that gets a lot of discussion. ICYMI, Google would allegedly increase the first highest and the second highest bid in its 2nd-price auctions then reinvest the "saved" funds back into other bids to Google wins more auctions. /2 Image
The problem is while it may have ended up providing more revenue to the publisher (from/through Google) and no doubt to Google, Inc, it allegedly ignored the revenue which could have come through another channel if Google didn't manipulate the rev share as it ran the auctions. /3 Image
Read 13 tweets
Nov 25, 2024
US v Google II Closing arguments today.
70min for DOJ-> 95min for Google-> 20min for DOJ. Having predicted this case as better odds than search case (Google already lost in August), nothing changed my mind today. I wrote down: influence/$, complexity, deception, and arrogance. /1
I'm staying high level on perception first as findings of fact already covered much. On influence/$, DOJ pointed out early on and then again in rebuttal that every single witness presented by Google (except one) was paid or had grants from Google. /2
On complexity, Google again executed on its spaghetti defense with lead counsel, Karen Dunn, bookending trial by running over as she did in her opening. She appeared to skip dozens of slides, many minutes of close. And she loaded her slides while talking twice as fast as DOJ! /3
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(