Magdi Jacobs Profile picture
Aug 9 18 tweets 4 min read Read on X
I have never felt anything so deeply in my bones as I do this. We're done. That doesn't mean we're done caring about issues, whether it's universal healthcare or M.E. conflict; rather, we're done being bullied & misrepresented. We're done letting that dynamic hurt good causes all while Fascism is rising.
Not agreeing w/ your tactics does not mean we don't agree w/ the ostensible cause. Let's be clear about that. You want to discuss the best tactics to bring about public awareness to a give cause you're passionate about? Let's discuss those tactics.
Don't confuse disagreement about tactics w/ disagreement or lack of caring about a cause, ok? Let's be frank about this. If you insist that agreement on a tactic is necessary for agreement about a cause, you're a bad community organizer. That's just. . . true.
Further, if you refuse to acknowledge the POVs of other people in your coalition about tactics & avenues for change, *you don't actually care about the underlying cause*.
It's been 8 long years since 2016. We've been through a lot. Liberals in the Democratic coalition have been exhausted on multiple fronts. We have to fight American fascism. We have to try to identify press biases that enable American fascism. Then we have to deal w/ "leftists" telling us that we're the real problem.
We've engaged in good arguments about each "monocause" the "left" has decided is the decision-point. Lengthy explainers on healthcare reform. On foreign policy. On the Supreme Court & courts in general. We've done it all. It never matters to these folks.
Why does it not matter to them? B/c they don't care about the good causes they claim to care about; they care about themselves. They care about being cool. About looking (not being) smart. They are nihilistic bullies who pretend to be virtuous bullies in order to be cool.
I'm done w/ them. I suspect the entire Democratic Party is also done w/ them.
A good rule of thumb we seem to have lost sight of: If a person claims to care about a topic, they should be willing to discuss tactics regarding that topic. If they refuse to do this, they do not care about the topic itself. They only care about their own performance
Discussion of tactics is Community Organization 101. How do you raise awareness? How do you get buy-in from the community? How to you effectively pressure politicians? Some of the people on the twitter "left" are totally unwilling to engage in these convos.
Rather, they seem to argue: if you do not agree with exactly how I am advocating for X, Y, Z issue, you are a "Non-Believer." You have no passion. No. We've been through this. We do care. They don't. They want to get their emotional jiggles out on the internet or on the street.
That's not where we're at. We care enough about the issues at hand that we want to discuss tactics & logistics. If they want to engage in conversation about this, they are so welcome to do so. If they are unwilling to do so, they have failed Community Organizing 101.
I mean, in any case, let's just be done. We can't let folks like this decide how much we care about a given cause. We certainly can't let them distract us from defeating American Fascism. Particularly given we know foreign interference is "hyping" them up.
I'm done. I think other Democrats and real antifascists are done too. Let's have good, productive conversations amongst people who we know actually care about 1. fighting bad people & 2. creating more good in the world.
Real, truly: Do not let people tell you what is in your own mind and your own heart. If you care, you know you care. You don't have to convince anyone else. If someone is unwilling to think about the productivity of tactics, they're being juvenile & myopic.
Their refusal to negotiate is not a sign of passion or true dedication. It is a sign of a kind of perpetual late-adolescence hyped up on social media dynamics. Let's just move on from these folks.
Also: every single one of these people is being exploited by Russia, by the way. We know this. We've been through it before. Why should any of us--including our nominee Kamala Harris--indulge it? We shouldn't. And the non-indulgence doesn't mean we don't care.
The non-indulgence means we care a lot. We care too much to let the perpetual college-dorm-room that social media has created guide our decision-making. They're trapped in late childhood. Now, the adults are talking. And we want to defeat the fascists.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Magdi Jacobs

Magdi Jacobs Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @magi_jay

Aug 9
I think there are many things going on with Trump. I also think it's revealing that very few of us have considered that one factor (among many factors) might be trauma from being shot at. The press hasn't considered it. I didn't consider it until yesterday. I'm not advocating for sympathy for the man. I'm pointing out something about the press's default-beliefs about Trump.

The press is likely somewhat driven by "He's so Big and Invincible" bias. There's something else here too: an implicit, unexamined recognition that Trump is a monster. A psychopath. Psychopaths can be "traumatized" by near-death experiences just like the rest of us. Psychopaths want to live; Psychopaths don't like being shot at. But the rest of us are not moved to imagine their trauma. To sympathize with it. To empathize with it.

I'm certainly not arguing for us to change our emotional response. Trump deserves neither our sympathy or our empathy precisely because he is an abusive monster.
But I think it's of genuine interest that the press seems to have defaulted to the idea that an attempted assassination wouldn't affect the man, either because he is All Powerful or because they have accepted he is soulless.

In any case, Trump's campaigning behavior is genuinely bizarre. The press should consider figuring out why. The first step might be to examine their own examined beliefs about Who Donald Trump Is. Why have they not asked how his psychological recovery is going? They did this with Fetterman post-stroke. What is it about the press's beliefs about Who Trump Is that removes such questions from the realm of their interest?

Perhaps Trump is too traumatized to campaign. The press would ask this about any other person who was shot at & then disappeared. They don't ask it about Trump. Why?
To be abundantly clear: I do not care how Trump is feeling. I do care that the press seems to treat him differently than all other politicians. I do care that a lot of this differential "treatment" seems to stem from 1. normalization of just how monstrous the man is & 2. acceptance of his I'm All Powerful fascistic message.
The press does this *a lot*. They asked questions for years about whether he was a racist. They don't ask those questions anymore because they decided the answer was "yes." But it was an implicit, unexamined decision. They neglected to tell the rest of us they had made it. They do not write, "Donald Trump, who is a known racist, said. . . " They've just stopped talking about his racism entirely.
Read 6 tweets
Aug 8
Republicans,
You can't effectively respond to "Did JD make sweet love to a couch?" w/ your own jokes or rumors. School Yard Rules. Whoever did it first has the power. Republicans w/ their attempts at Walz-rumors have all the energy of a kid saying, "Well, well, YOU'RE ugly TOO!"
No I am not participating in any pearl-clutching about Vance-Couch-Love. That's ridiculous. We're not lying about policies. Which they do all the time. We're telling a joke everyone knows is a joke.
And we're telling the joke to cut a fascist down. A man who hates me. A man who would meet me and think about my body, my ovaries, what they're producing, what they're not producing, & then tell me what to do with my body and my life and my mind.
Read 13 tweets
Aug 7
I would like to alert people to something. There is a lot of foreign interference occurring on this website. I do not have much time to write now, but I do want us all to be aware of the nature of this interference. I want us all to combat it. Collectively. As Democrats. A 🧵:
Much of the interference is Russian. Some could be from other countries, such as Iran & China. There's also interference from elsewhere in the Middle East. Hamas. Hezbollah. The Houthis. Most of the interference is Russian, I think. All of it follows the Russian playbook.
The interference seeks to:
1. Divide & depress anti-Trump voters (as well as anti-fascist voters in other countries)
2. Energize Trump voters (as well as far-right voters in other countries)
3. Win elections for authoritarians by doing #1 & #2 simultaneously
Read 19 tweets
Aug 5
I would like to suggest some very simple social media tactics that all Democrats should engage in before the election. A 🧵
1. It's fine to disagree w/ Dems from now until #EDay; That said, plz do so respectfully & kindly. The media thrives on Democratic discord. Every time Democrats/Leftists/etc engage in ferocious debate online, editors contact people like me to write Op-Eds. This drives coverage.
2. Put winning the election above social media clout. This involves not trying to be cool by dragging other Democrats (or possible Dem voters). It also involves not overly curating your twitter feed. RT Cringe. RT Democrats saying good things. This matters.
Read 18 tweets
Aug 3
"EARN MY VOTE BY AGREEING WITH ME ON EVERY ISSUE INCLUDING THE EXTREMELY NICHE ONES AND ALSO YOU MUST PHRASE YOUR DISAGREEMENT EXACTLY THE SAME WAY ME AND MY COLLEGE ROOMMATES WOULD PHRASE IT" yells a person who lives in a democracy.
I'm getting more frustrated by this as I age. I am a very liberal woman. Most people in this country are more moderate or conservative than I am. If my POTUS, Senator, or Rep shares 75% of the same views as I do, I'm pretty damn lucky. I live in a country of 300 million people.
"We agree that more equity is needed in education but do we agree on exactly the right way to address this inequity in terms of both the short-term needs of low-income families & ALSO the long-term strength of our school system? We don't have complete agreement on that? NO COALITION WITH YOU!"
Read 8 tweets
Jul 26
When we witness acts like these, it is incumbent to consider 2 sets of questions
1: How do we feel about the protests themselves?
2: What would happen to these protesters if Donald Trump were president, given SCOTUS's immunity decision? What would then happen to the rest of us?

Image
Image
Image
I think everyone who follows me knows, at this point, how I feel about these specific protests. They are counter-productive at best & antisemitic at worst. There has been illegal behavior, incl. violence that should be addressed by police. All of this deserves to be talked about.
Now let's talk about Trump. Trump, if he wins, will not be beginning his term as he did in 2017, somewhat chaotically, w/out a plan. Those were "normal" times; these are "abnormal" times. And, during these abnormal times, Trump has a plan. It's called #Project2025.
Read 12 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(