Lots of SARS-CoV-2 in wastewater. Far fewer hospitalizations than in early waves of this size.
Why?
Could be several (non-mutually-exclusive) things. We've talked about most of these at various times before, but here's a rundown of some hypotheses.
🧵
H1. Hospitalizations lag wastewater, so it's just a matter of time.
I don't think this is it, to be honest. Hospitals haven't been overrun during waves for long time now and wastewater levels have been high for a while already.
H2. Acute severity is lower because of the immunity that most people now have to some degree, be it from vaccination, infection, or both.
I think this is a major factor, BUT this should be taken with cautious optimism.
If most of the shedding of virus into wastewater is being done by people with low risk factors for severe acute illness (young, otherwise healthy, etc.), this could decouple wastewater signal and hospitalizations.
H4. Current variants cause less severe respiratory illness because they infect different parts of the respiratory tract. This can affect acute respiratory severity.
H5. Current variants site greater tropism to the gut and are shed more in wastewater. That is, it's not necessarily more infections, but more virus being pooped out per infection.
H6. Hospitals aren't testing as much and COVID is being listed as something else.
H7. The virus is inherently less virulent now.
Maybe. But there's no obvious reason why this would be the case and there is no automatic tendency for viruses to become milder. Even if this is true, there's no guarantee it wouldn't evolve more virulence again later.
H8. We have robust, long-lasting, hybrid immunity that is totally non-waning and not escaped by evolving variants, so this is definitely the exit wave for serious this time.
Yes, there are "experts" who seem to truly believe this. 🤷♂️
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
And on the two levels of evolution in action. Note that within-host processes (intrahost evolution during persistent infection and recombination during co-infection) are necessarily more common now than they were at the start of the pandemic.
SARS-CoV-2 provides an unprecedented opportunity to watch evolution occur in real time. It also happens to be showing the pervasiveness of many misconceptions about evolution, even among scientists with limited knowledge of evolutionary biology. Here's a list and explanations. 🧵
Misconceptions about evolution on display with SARS-CoV-2:
1. Typological thinking. 2. Variation seen as noise rather than signal. 3. Teleology. 4. Orthogenesis. 5. Not understanding how natural selection works. 6. Ignoring Orgel's second rule. 7. Myths about human evolution.
1. Typological thinking.
This is the idea that there is a single "type" that represents an entire taxon (as a holdover of pre-evolutionary thinking, we still have a "type specimen" in Linnaean taxonomy).
We sure went quickly from "it's just another seasonal respiratory virus like flu and colds" to "several surges per year are to be expected as immunity wanes and immune-escaping variants evolve".
Reminder 1: that waning, escaped immunity is what is currently keeping severity low.
Reminder 2: Vaccines become outdated as new variants evolve, and there is no effort to be predictive with updated vaccines. They're generally already behind variant evolution before they even roll out. We could do better than this.
Reminder 3: "Hybrid immunity" is why severity is low, not the virus becoming more benign. That immunity has to be maintained by updated vaccination or infection. If vaccine uptake is low and/or they're only available to "the vulnerable", then most immunity will be by infection.
Lower acute severity of SARS-CoV-2 vs. 2020-2022 is welcome, but there's a danger in reading too much into it, in the same way that it's misguided to deny climate change because it's been cold where you live.
A few thoughts as to why our optimism should be cautious.
🧵
1. The lower acute severity seen right now is very likely due to host immunity, not to a reduction in inherent virulence. That immunity comes from two sources: vaccination and past infection (or both, so-called "hybrid immunity").
Cont'd...
There are issues with relying on "hybrid immunity" to keep us safer from severe acute illness:
i. It doesn't necessarily stop transmission. More infections means more variant evolution, often specifically in the direction of increased immune escape.