BREAKING: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons, an organization representing 92% of all board-certified plastic surgeons in the U.S., becomes the first major medical association to break from the consensus over “gender-affirming care” for minors.
This is big news. 🧵
2/ In the U.S., the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries to help kids who feel distressed about their developing bodies has depended on a perceived consensus of medical groups.
3/ Critics argue that the consensus is manufactured and enforced through suppression of alternative viewpoints and of evidence reviews. The @AmerAcadPeds, for instance, has suppressed member initiatives to get the group to conduct a systematic review of the evidence.
4/ The consensus of medical associations is a chief reason for the growing divide between the U.S. and Europe, where countries have reversed course on youth gender medicine after finding the evidence too weak to support the routine use of Rx.
5/ Court documents recently revealed that @wpath suppressed systematic reviews of evidence and eliminated age minimums for surgery under pressure from HHS’s Rachel Levine (@HHS_ASH). WPATH is the source of the U.S. consensus; its members helped write @TheEndoSociety guidelines.
6/ When I reached out to ASPS (@ASPS_News) for comment on the court/WPATH revelations, the group said it acknowledges the “low quality” nature of the evidence for Rx. It emphasized that it has never endorsed WPATH’s “standards of care” or the Endocrine Society’s 2017 CPG.
7/ ASPS also said it is currently “reviewing and prioritizing several initiatives,” presumably to provide members with better guidance.
8/ My piece also presents, for the first time, data on <18 gender surgeries from an ongoing @ManhattanInst analysis of a national all-payers all-claims U.S. insurance database.
9/ The numbers are higher than even the higher estimates published to date, and that’s still based on a conservative estimate. I present the numbers and trends (including for fast-emerging "non-binary" surgeries") in the piece.
10/ I also discuss how gender clinics provide templates to mental health providers for "letters of support" for surgery. The clinic at @seattlechildren provides a template (link & screenshot in article) designed to bypass any concerns about ROGD. The author of the template appears to be a lecturer in creative writing at a university English department.
11/ At least 7 ASPS members are currently being sued by detransitioners. This includes Winnie Tong, who performed a double mastectomy on Kayla Lovdahl when she was 13 years old. Tong did a 30-minute evaluation of Lovdahl when she was just 12, according to her legal complaint.
12/ I discuss the question of legal liability for plastic surgeons, who, though part of a “multidisciplinary team,” often receive patients after they've been affirmed & medicalized. Gender surgeons seem to defer to clinicians at earlier stages in the “affirming” protocol.
13/ Dr. Sheila Nazarian (@DoctorNazarian), a Beverly Hills-based plastic surgeon who has been following the intl' developments in youth gender Rx, told me that colleagues fear "professional and social blowback" from raising questions or concerns about gender surgery on kids.
14/ The current approach “reduces surgeons to mechanics,” Nazarian says, but “we are not highly trained technicians. We are physicians with responsibility for the health and well-being of our patients… You can’t outsource your professional judgement to other clinicians.”
🚨While attention has been focused on medical groups backing off from gender surgeries in minors and a $2M detransitioner lawsuit, an important exchange has taken place in Stat News Opinion First between authors and critics of the HHS report on pediatric gender dysphoria.
👇
Last week, a group of self-described “pediatric bioethicists” and advocates for pediatric medical transition (PMT), including Yale Medicine’s Meredithe McNamara, criticized the HHS report, writing that “analysis of its poor ethical reasoning remains urgently needed.”
Today, a group of HHS report authors responded, explaining why the report’s reasoning is consistent with widely accepted principles of medical ethics and pointing to serious flaws in the McNamara group’s article.
Thousands of U.S. parents have consented to having surgeons remove their daughters' breasts after being assured that their daughters were at serious risk of suicide otherwise.
Now, the incoming president of WPATH says mastectomy "in and of itself" doesn't prevent suicide.
This is the result of our data analysis of U.S. insurance claims. A bare minimum of 5,200 teen girls had their breasts amputated as part of a "gender-affirming" procedure between 2017 and 2023.
1/ As @abigailandwords correctly notes in @NRO, the @APApsychiatric agreed to participate in the peer-review process and condemned the report for overlooking 16 studies, but the APA itself overlooked the HHS report's evidence review, which included 12 of those studies. In fact, several of them (e.g., Tordoff, Chen, de Vries) were discussed in detail in the main report. Of the remaining 4 studies, 3 were on adults rather than youth, and 1 was published after the HHS Review came out (though the final version does account for it).
#ReadtheReport
2/ Here is a summary of the allegedly overlooked studies cited by @APApsychiatric and where they appear in the HHS Review. It can easily be found in the Supplement, which was published on Wednesday.
3/ The APA had no response to our analysis of studies like Chen (2023) and Tordoff (2022), or to the umbrella review, which is mentioned throughout the report.
The APA did not engage with, and possibly did not even see, the most critical part of the HHS Review.
🚨With a puberty blocker trial looming in the UK, here is why the HHS Review concludes: "administering [pediatric medical transition] to adolescents, even in a research context, is in tension with well-established ethical norms for human subjects research." 1/5
District court vacates Biden-era rule declaring that “sex” in Section 1557 of the ACA includes “gender identity.”
This rule and its antecedents in the Obama years mandated that healthcare providers offer “gender-affirming care.” 1/
2/ The court disagreed with the Biden HHS that the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Bostock v. Clayton Country (2020) requires interpreting Title IX (imported into 1557) to mean that sex = gender identity.
Even if that were true, the court adds, Bostock doesn’t compel gender Rx.
3/ The court finds that the Biden HHS exceeded its authority when interpreting Section 1557 as it did.
Interpreting sex as “gender identity” is a legislative act, and thus something only Congress may do.