BREAKING: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons, an organization representing 92% of all board-certified plastic surgeons in the U.S., becomes the first major medical association to break from the consensus over “gender-affirming care” for minors.
This is big news. 🧵
2/ In the U.S., the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries to help kids who feel distressed about their developing bodies has depended on a perceived consensus of medical groups.
3/ Critics argue that the consensus is manufactured and enforced through suppression of alternative viewpoints and of evidence reviews. The @AmerAcadPeds, for instance, has suppressed member initiatives to get the group to conduct a systematic review of the evidence.
4/ The consensus of medical associations is a chief reason for the growing divide between the U.S. and Europe, where countries have reversed course on youth gender medicine after finding the evidence too weak to support the routine use of Rx.
5/ Court documents recently revealed that @wpath suppressed systematic reviews of evidence and eliminated age minimums for surgery under pressure from HHS’s Rachel Levine (@HHS_ASH). WPATH is the source of the U.S. consensus; its members helped write @TheEndoSociety guidelines.
6/ When I reached out to ASPS (@ASPS_News) for comment on the court/WPATH revelations, the group said it acknowledges the “low quality” nature of the evidence for Rx. It emphasized that it has never endorsed WPATH’s “standards of care” or the Endocrine Society’s 2017 CPG.
7/ ASPS also said it is currently “reviewing and prioritizing several initiatives,” presumably to provide members with better guidance.
8/ My piece also presents, for the first time, data on <18 gender surgeries from an ongoing @ManhattanInst analysis of a national all-payers all-claims U.S. insurance database.
9/ The numbers are higher than even the higher estimates published to date, and that’s still based on a conservative estimate. I present the numbers and trends (including for fast-emerging "non-binary" surgeries") in the piece.
10/ I also discuss how gender clinics provide templates to mental health providers for "letters of support" for surgery. The clinic at @seattlechildren provides a template (link & screenshot in article) designed to bypass any concerns about ROGD. The author of the template appears to be a lecturer in creative writing at a university English department.
11/ At least 7 ASPS members are currently being sued by detransitioners. This includes Winnie Tong, who performed a double mastectomy on Kayla Lovdahl when she was 13 years old. Tong did a 30-minute evaluation of Lovdahl when she was just 12, according to her legal complaint.
12/ I discuss the question of legal liability for plastic surgeons, who, though part of a “multidisciplinary team,” often receive patients after they've been affirmed & medicalized. Gender surgeons seem to defer to clinicians at earlier stages in the “affirming” protocol.
13/ Dr. Sheila Nazarian (@DoctorNazarian), a Beverly Hills-based plastic surgeon who has been following the intl' developments in youth gender Rx, told me that colleagues fear "professional and social blowback" from raising questions or concerns about gender surgery on kids.
14/ The current approach “reduces surgeons to mechanics,” Nazarian says, but “we are not highly trained technicians. We are physicians with responsibility for the health and well-being of our patients… You can’t outsource your professional judgement to other clinicians.”
NEWS: The Federal Trade Commission has just announced its lawsuit (with four states) against the World Professional Association for Transgender Health. 👇
The FTC alleges that WPATH "misled parents and children about the medical consensus and medical necessity, as well as the safety and effectiveness" of gender transition interventions (puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones, and surgeries), "in violation of the FTC Act."
The complaint has been filed in the federal district court for the northern district of Texas, a traditionally friendly venue for such actions.
A widely cited study published in the prestigious @NatureHumBehav claimed that “anti-transgender laws” encouraged teen suicide attempts.
A new methodological review dismantles that finding.
New from me in @cityjournal
In 2024, amidst a wave of state legislation on transgender issues, a leading academic journal published a study claiming to find that that legislation increased suicide attempts by up to 72%.
The finding was blasted all over left-of-center media, with even some healthcare outlets uncritically citing its conclusion as well.
NEW: Last week, the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions committee held a hearing on pediatric gender medicine.
The hearing was predictable and largely unremarkable but for a very curious, and potentially very important, omission. 🧵
At no point did the Senate Democrats or their expert witness, @shannonminter5 of the National Center for LGBTQ (formerly Lesbian) Rights (@NCLRights), refer to or cite the authority of the World Professional Association for Transgender Health, or WPATH (@wpath).
In 2023, Minter, an attorney, testified before the House Judiciary Committee on the same topic.
Minter's submitted written testimony from that hearing cited WPATH and its Standards of Care, v. 8.
NEW: Two coauthors of the HHS review on treatment for pediatric gender dysphoria argue in @JAMAPediatrics that the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid "should carefully consider whether the proposed rules may be improved by the inclusion of a grandfather clause." 🧵
Kathleen McDeavitt, a psychiatrist at Baylor College of Medicine, and Moti Gorin, a philosopher and bioethicist at Colorado State University, are coauthors (with me) of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services' peer-reviewed report from last year.
The centerpiece of the HHS review was an "umbrella review" (systematic review of systematic reviews) which confirmed the finding that pediatric medical transition is based on very low certainty evidence (using GRADE).
NEW: @jessesingal with new revelations, based on FOIAs, about the Johanna Olson-Kennedy-led, @NIH-funded ($10m) research initiative on pediatric gender medicine. 🧵
NIH was misled with help from @wpath and @TheEndoSociety.
Olson-Kennedy and her colleagues intended to study the effects of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones in minors.
NIH initially "expressed qualms" about the proposed study being observational rather experimental. Singal explains the difference, and why it matters.
With support from @wpath and @TheEndoSociety, however, Olson-Kennedy told NIH that the treatments are known to work and that withholding them (i.e., having a control group) would be unethical.
I'm often asked: “What makes pediatric gender doctors do what they do?"
Good question.
Here are 9 overlooked factors, to add to the obvious one: ideological agreement with the “gender-affirming” outlook.
These are unsystematic observations, so take with a grain of salt. 🧵
1. Lack of experience. Early-career doctors lack clinical experience, a critical corrective mechanism to the abstractions they absorb in the classroom. Also, being young, they typically don’t have kids themselves and therefore have not experienced the ways of developmentally typical children and teens. If a young clinician lacks these experiences but constantly sees trans-identified patients, it's easy to see how s/he would have a skewed understanding of human sexual development.
2. Action bias. Medicine—and, some would argue, most of healing—often consists of not doing anything, counting on the body’s natural tendency to heal itself while watchfully waiting to see if/when intervention is needed. For adolescents in the throes of puberty, time and experience typically build resilience and mitigate distress. It’s tempting for inexperienced healers to want to “do something” and to equate inaction with not helping or even harming.