BREAKING: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons, an organization representing 92% of all board-certified plastic surgeons in the U.S., becomes the first major medical association to break from the consensus over “gender-affirming care” for minors.
This is big news. 🧵
2/ In the U.S., the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries to help kids who feel distressed about their developing bodies has depended on a perceived consensus of medical groups.
3/ Critics argue that the consensus is manufactured and enforced through suppression of alternative viewpoints and of evidence reviews. The @AmerAcadPeds, for instance, has suppressed member initiatives to get the group to conduct a systematic review of the evidence.
4/ The consensus of medical associations is a chief reason for the growing divide between the U.S. and Europe, where countries have reversed course on youth gender medicine after finding the evidence too weak to support the routine use of Rx.
5/ Court documents recently revealed that @wpath suppressed systematic reviews of evidence and eliminated age minimums for surgery under pressure from HHS’s Rachel Levine (@HHS_ASH). WPATH is the source of the U.S. consensus; its members helped write @TheEndoSociety guidelines.
6/ When I reached out to ASPS (@ASPS_News) for comment on the court/WPATH revelations, the group said it acknowledges the “low quality” nature of the evidence for Rx. It emphasized that it has never endorsed WPATH’s “standards of care” or the Endocrine Society’s 2017 CPG.
7/ ASPS also said it is currently “reviewing and prioritizing several initiatives,” presumably to provide members with better guidance.
8/ My piece also presents, for the first time, data on <18 gender surgeries from an ongoing @ManhattanInst analysis of a national all-payers all-claims U.S. insurance database.
9/ The numbers are higher than even the higher estimates published to date, and that’s still based on a conservative estimate. I present the numbers and trends (including for fast-emerging "non-binary" surgeries") in the piece.
10/ I also discuss how gender clinics provide templates to mental health providers for "letters of support" for surgery. The clinic at @seattlechildren provides a template (link & screenshot in article) designed to bypass any concerns about ROGD. The author of the template appears to be a lecturer in creative writing at a university English department.
11/ At least 7 ASPS members are currently being sued by detransitioners. This includes Winnie Tong, who performed a double mastectomy on Kayla Lovdahl when she was 13 years old. Tong did a 30-minute evaluation of Lovdahl when she was just 12, according to her legal complaint.
12/ I discuss the question of legal liability for plastic surgeons, who, though part of a “multidisciplinary team,” often receive patients after they've been affirmed & medicalized. Gender surgeons seem to defer to clinicians at earlier stages in the “affirming” protocol.
13/ Dr. Sheila Nazarian (@DoctorNazarian), a Beverly Hills-based plastic surgeon who has been following the intl' developments in youth gender Rx, told me that colleagues fear "professional and social blowback" from raising questions or concerns about gender surgery on kids.
14/ The current approach “reduces surgeons to mechanics,” Nazarian says, but “we are not highly trained technicians. We are physicians with responsibility for the health and well-being of our patients… You can’t outsource your professional judgement to other clinicians.”
🚨Dr. Daniel Shumer of @UMichMedSchool is a prolific expert witness in transgender litigation. He has served as expert witness in “about 15” lawsuits and has been paid around $150,000 over the past 4-5 years.
Shumer has admitted to plagiarism in his expert report.
🧵
The admission was made in a deposition on March 5, in the context of litigation (Doe v. Horne) over an Arizona law prohibiting males from competing in female sports.
At the beginning of the deposition, the examining lawyer asks Shumer to confirm his sworn attestation that he is the sole author of his expert report.
"I was the sole author of the report," he replies (12:25, 13:1).
🚨The New England Journal of Medicine is one of the most prestigious medical journals in the world.
In a new investigation for @CityJournal, I show how @NEJM has put ideological commitments over scientific rigor and debate on the topic of youth gender medicine.
Thread 🧵
2/ My investigative dive into NEJM’s conduct is based on published documents, unpublished submissions and backdoor communications with journal editors.
3/ NEJM publishes original research as well as Perspective pieces, which are supposed to be scientifically informed opinion pieces that undergo peer review.
For the first two articles in this series, I covered the depositions of @Jack_Turban and Meredithe McNamara.
Today’s article in @CityJournal is all about the chair and lead author of @wpath’s latest “standards of care." 🧵
Dr. Eli Coleman, a professor emeritus at @UNM_MEDS and founder of U of M's @Human_Sexuality, which was renamed in his honor, submitted to an 8-hour deposition at the hands of Roger Brooks of @ADFLegal in the context of Boe v. Marshall, the Alabama age restriction lawsuit.
Coleman's most important admissions had to do with conflict-of-interest management in the development of SOC-8. More on that in a moment.
One benefit of the new lawsuit against Johanna Olson-Kennedy is that newspapers will have little choice but to report on it, and on her, and will inevitably reveal to the public one of the darkest and most twisted figures in “gender medicine.”
BREAKING: Johanna Olson-Kennedy, perhaps the top name in pediatric "gender-affirming care" in the U.S., is being sued by a former patient.
@jessesingal reports in @TheEconomist 🧵
JOK does not believe in mental health assessments, Singal reports. "I don't send someone to a therapist when I'm going to start them on insulin," she once explained.
The @ChildrensLA doctor has referred children as young as 12 and 13 for, respectively, hormones and mastectomy.
JOK is also recipient of the largest @NIH grant to study the off-label use of puberty blockers & cross-sex hormones. Recently, the @nytimes revealed that she refused to publish outcome data on puberty blockers, fearing that the unimpressive results would be cited by critics.
NEW: Azeen Ghorayshi reports in the @nytimes that prominent gender clinician Johanna Olson-Kennedy of @ChildrensLA has refused to publish data from a study on puberty blockers, fearing that the unimpressive results will be "weaponized" by critics of "gender-affirming care." 🧵
Olson-Kennedy told the Times that the kids didn't improve because their mental health was "in really good shape" at the start of the study.
As Ghorayshi notes, this seems to contradict what Olson-Kennedy et al. reported in 2022 about the study's cohort at baseline.
Olson-Kennedy fears the study's results could be cited by critics of pediatric sex "change" in court cases. She doesn't seem to think that, as a medical researcher and clinician, her primary responsibility is to her current and future patients.