BREAKING: The American Society of Plastic Surgeons, an organization representing 92% of all board-certified plastic surgeons in the U.S., becomes the first major medical association to break from the consensus over “gender-affirming care” for minors.
This is big news. 🧵
2/ In the U.S., the use of puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and surgeries to help kids who feel distressed about their developing bodies has depended on a perceived consensus of medical groups.
3/ Critics argue that the consensus is manufactured and enforced through suppression of alternative viewpoints and of evidence reviews. The @AmerAcadPeds, for instance, has suppressed member initiatives to get the group to conduct a systematic review of the evidence.
4/ The consensus of medical associations is a chief reason for the growing divide between the U.S. and Europe, where countries have reversed course on youth gender medicine after finding the evidence too weak to support the routine use of Rx.
5/ Court documents recently revealed that @wpath suppressed systematic reviews of evidence and eliminated age minimums for surgery under pressure from HHS’s Rachel Levine (@HHS_ASH). WPATH is the source of the U.S. consensus; its members helped write @TheEndoSociety guidelines.
6/ When I reached out to ASPS (@ASPS_News) for comment on the court/WPATH revelations, the group said it acknowledges the “low quality” nature of the evidence for Rx. It emphasized that it has never endorsed WPATH’s “standards of care” or the Endocrine Society’s 2017 CPG.
7/ ASPS also said it is currently “reviewing and prioritizing several initiatives,” presumably to provide members with better guidance.
8/ My piece also presents, for the first time, data on <18 gender surgeries from an ongoing @ManhattanInst analysis of a national all-payers all-claims U.S. insurance database.
9/ The numbers are higher than even the higher estimates published to date, and that’s still based on a conservative estimate. I present the numbers and trends (including for fast-emerging "non-binary" surgeries") in the piece.
10/ I also discuss how gender clinics provide templates to mental health providers for "letters of support" for surgery. The clinic at @seattlechildren provides a template (link & screenshot in article) designed to bypass any concerns about ROGD. The author of the template appears to be a lecturer in creative writing at a university English department.
11/ At least 7 ASPS members are currently being sued by detransitioners. This includes Winnie Tong, who performed a double mastectomy on Kayla Lovdahl when she was 13 years old. Tong did a 30-minute evaluation of Lovdahl when she was just 12, according to her legal complaint.
12/ I discuss the question of legal liability for plastic surgeons, who, though part of a “multidisciplinary team,” often receive patients after they've been affirmed & medicalized. Gender surgeons seem to defer to clinicians at earlier stages in the “affirming” protocol.
13/ Dr. Sheila Nazarian (@DoctorNazarian), a Beverly Hills-based plastic surgeon who has been following the intl' developments in youth gender Rx, told me that colleagues fear "professional and social blowback" from raising questions or concerns about gender surgery on kids.
14/ The current approach “reduces surgeons to mechanics,” Nazarian says, but “we are not highly trained technicians. We are physicians with responsibility for the health and well-being of our patients… You can’t outsource your professional judgement to other clinicians.”
BREAKING: The New York Times (@nytimes) has just called out the Chair of the Board of the American Medical Association (@AmerMedicalAssn), Dr. David Aizuss (@lasereyedoc), for misrepresenting his organization's recent media statements on pediatric gender medicine.
Here's what happened🧵
On February 3, the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (@ASPS_News) published its policy statement acknowledging the low quality of evidence for hormones and surgeries in <19 and recommending that surgeries be deferred to age 19+.
The following day, the American Medical Association told National Review (@NRO) and the New York Times (@nytimes) that it agreed with ASPS on surgeries.
Here is what the AMA's communications officer, Joshua Zembik, told the NYT:
Two articles came out today on pediatric gender medicine and its current political context.
Both are worth reading🧵
In @TheAtlantic, @benappel writes about the difficulties growing up as an effeminate boy. He would later discover that so-called "progressives" were now nudging effeminate boys to interpret their feelings of difference as evidence that they are really girls.
Appel calls for an honest conversation among liberals of how a regressive outlook, now fueling a medical practice, has managed to pass itself off as progressive. And he calls for greater tolerance for gender nonconformity in boys from liberals and conservatives.
NEW: “I’ve been covering this controversy for about a decade from a left-of-center perspective, and I’ve found that anyone who questions these treatments, even mildly, is invariably accused of bigotry.”
🧵on @jessesingal’s important new piece in the New York Times this morning.
For years, LGBT organizations insisted that the science of youth gender medicine was settled, citing an apparent consensus of medical associations.
Now that the American Society of Plastic Surgeons has backed away from gender surgeries in <19, with the American Medical Association endorsing the move, there is no longer a consensus. The ASPS also acknowledged the lack of supportive evidence for hormones.
🚨A group of 106 members of Congress wrote a letter to Secretary of HHS RJK, Jr., criticizing the Department's efforts to roll back what they call "medically necessary, evidence-based care" in the form of puberty blockers and cross-sex hormones (but not surgeries). 🧵
With surgeries unmentioned, the authors say that endocrine interventions are supported by "every major medical and mental health association in the U.S."
Astoundingly, they claim that "numerous studies and systematic reviews... have confirmed the safety, efficacy, and benefits" of these interventions.
Their only citation is the Utah report, which is not a systematic review.
🚨While attention has been focused on medical groups backing off from gender surgeries in minors and a $2M detransitioner lawsuit, an important exchange has taken place in Stat News Opinion First between authors and critics of the HHS report on pediatric gender dysphoria.
👇
Last week, a group of self-described “pediatric bioethicists” and advocates for pediatric medical transition (PMT), including Yale Medicine’s Meredithe McNamara, criticized the HHS report, writing that “analysis of its poor ethical reasoning remains urgently needed.”
Today, a group of HHS report authors responded, explaining why the report’s reasoning is consistent with widely accepted principles of medical ethics and pointing to serious flaws in the McNamara group’s article.