🧵🇺🇸 MAINSTREAM MEDIA SKEWS TRUMP-ELON X SPACE COVERAGE, IGNORES RECORD-BREAKING SUCCESS
Major news outlets show clear bias in reporting the Trump-Elon X Space.
The numbers speak for themselves:
- 1.32+ million live listeners during the Space
- 77+ million impressions in just 3 hours
- Over 343,000 likes, 104,000 reposts, and 318,000 comments
Despite this unprecedented engagement, mainstream media focuses on technical issues, ignoring its massive success and impact on political discourse.
1. MSNBC: "At least he's consistent": Brian Tyler Cohen reacts to Elon Musk's glitchy X interview with Donald Trump"
Consistency in tech issues or in breaking audience records? MSNBC seems confused.
2. AP: "Trump and Musk talk about assassination attempt and deportations during glitchy chat on X"
AP manages to ignore 1.3M listeners while fixating on temporary glitches. Stellar journalism.
3. The Guardian: "US election live: Trump rehashes vitriol and falsehoods in rambling talk with Musk on X"
"Rambling talk" attracts more listeners than Guardian's yearly readership.
4. Bloomberg: "Musk Pitches White House Role in Glitchy Trump Conversation"
Bloomberg pitches bias in glitchy attempt at objective reporting.
5. CNN: "At several points throughout Donald Trump's Monday interview with Elon Musk, the former president's speech sounded as if he had a lisp or was slurring his words, attracting attention online."
CNN obsesses over pronunciation while 1.3M listeners focus on content.
Perhaps it's CNN's journalistic standards that are slurring.
6. The Washington Post: "Live Election Updates: Trump Revisits His Talking Points in Delayed Online Talk With Musk"
WaPo revisits biased reporting in delayed attempt at relevance.
7. New York Times: "Live Election Updates: Trump Revisits His Talking Points in Delayed Online Talk With Musk"
NYT calls familiar policy positions "talking points," ignores massive audience eager to hear them.
8. In closing...
Linda Yaccarino:
"Unscripted. Unfiltered. So Real. So good!"
X's CEO cuts through legacy media spin, highlighting what over 1M listeners already knew - this was groundbreaking, authentic political discourse.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
They recently released Firebase Studio — an AI tool that can build and ship entire applications from a simple idea.
This isn’t just a code generator…
It’s a full-stack app builder powered by AI.
Here’s what you need to know: 🧵
1. Firebase Studio is a new cloud-based development platform made for building AI-powered apps. It brings everything you need into one place — from writing and testing your code to deploying and running apps in production.
It’s designed to save you time, reduce complexity, and help you create high-quality AI applications faster than ever. Whether you're just starting or scaling up, Firebase Studio makes the entire process smoother with built-in tools and automation.
2. Quickly Build AI Apps with Firebase Studio
Firebase Studio makes it easy to start building AI apps using simple prompts, images, or even sketches. Just use the App Prototyping agent to create working web app prototypes (starting with Next.js) in seconds.
When you click “Prototype this app,” it instantly creates a functional Next.js web app — not just the UI, but also the backend setup.
It also connects everything with Genkit and gives you a Gemini API key, so your AI features work right away without any extra setup.
Insane updates from:
🧠 OpenAI
🔍 Google
🧠 Claude
📱 Meta
…and more.
Here’s everything you need to know 👇
1. OpenAI is giving college students in the US and Canada free access to ChatGPT Plus until the end of May.
This $20/month plan includes advanced tools like GPT-4o (its most powerful AI model), image creation, voice features, and better research support — all for free during final exam season. The move is seen as part of OpenAI’s push to compete with rivals like Anthropic in the education space.
2. Google introduces CURIE, a new benchmark to test how well AI can handle scientific tasks.
CURIE stands for long-Context Understanding, Reasoning, and Information Extraction. It's designed to evaluate how large language models (LLMs) can solve complex scientific problems and support researchers in real-world scientific work.