WOODROW WILSON may be America’s WORST-EVER president on free speech.
As president, Wilson weaponized fear of spies during WWI to silence critics, arrest suffragists, and even weaponize the postal service. 🧵
2/ Although Wilson was hardly a stout defender of the First Amendment in his first term, it wasn’t until the USA entered WORLD WAR I in 1917 that his censorship program began.
3/ Wilson began with the Espionage Act banning false information “harmful” to the US war effort and restricting what could be sent through the mail. He effectively weaponized the postal service against his adversaries destroying the distribution channels for 70+ publications.
4/ What started out as a noble goal (protecting the US in wartime) still had disastrous consequences for speech. The message was clear: don’t talk. One year into the war, Wilson announced the Sedition Act which escalated the speech restrictions to dire levels.
5/ The Sedition Act Banned:
👉🏻 advocating for labor strikes
👉🏻 supporting countries at war with the US
👉🏻 incitement to “insubordination” in military
👉🏻 “disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the government the Constitution, the military or the flag”
6/ Ironically, this ban on disloyal speech on the Constitution violated the very principles Wilson was attempting to defend, which raises the question, “What mattered more the Constitution or silencing Wilson’s critics?”
7/ The Espionage and Sedition Acts led to 2000+ prosecutions and about 1000 convictions, not to mention a massive violation of American’s free speech rights. As this image points out, even Jesus would have found himself on the wrong side of these rules!
8/ Some of those were arrested for protesting Wilson himself! The Women’s Suffrage Movement had long criticized Wilson for his reluctance to champion their voting rights.
9/ But in 1919, the tension escalated. The suffragists were fed up with Wilson’s refusal to advocate on their behalf, so they protested outside the White House, burning an effigy of Wilson (a straw-stuffed Wilson doll) to show their anger.
10/ “We burn not the effigy of the President of a free people, but the leader of an autocratic party organization,” said one woman. Wilson’s counteraction against the protestors only confirmed this statement.
11/ The police arrested dozens of women for making “violent speeches.” But last time we checked, speech isn’t violence. Wilson used force to silence his opposition.
12/ And this wasn’t the first time. Suffragists were arrested during a multi-year protest outside the White House. After those imprisoned started a hunger strike, they were even force-fed, as this poster demonstrates.
13/ These abuses of government power make Wilson an abominable president for free speech.
The good news is speech triumphed over censorship, the Sedition Act and parts of the Espionage Act were repealed, and the suffragists got the last laugh with the passing of the 19th Amendment in 1920. And the rest is history!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Donald Trump’s nominee to lead the National Institutes of Health, Dr. Jay Bhattacharya, suggested using FIRE’s College Free Speech Rankings to assess grant money applicants. While it’s gratifying to know Dr. Bhattacharya finds CFSR valuable, they should not be used for this. 👇
2/ The College Free Speech Rankings are designed to help students find campuses where they can feel comfortable expressing themselves and incentivize campus leaders to reform speech policies and stop censoring students.
3/ The rankings do not assess a college’s policies about academic freedom rights, the research conduct of professors, or faculty sentiment about their campus climates for free speech. The rankings simply don’t provide the right kind of information to make informed decisions about grant funding.
Free speech on college campuses is a proud American tradition, and — on public campuses — protected by the First Amendment. President Trump's message this morning, combined with other recent executive orders threatening punishment for protected speech, is deeply chilling. 🧵
2/ Two things are true:
1) Peaceful protest isn’t illegal and the government must follow the First Amendment.
2) Misconduct or criminality — like true threats, vandalism, or discriminatory harassment, properly defined — isn’t free speech and must be punished.
3/ The president can’t force institutions to expel students. Students are entitled to due process on public college campuses and, almost universally, on private ones, too.
LAWSUIT: Alexis Luttrell wanted to decorate her yard with giant skeletons for Christmas. The city told her to take them down or appear before a judge.
Now, FIRE is suing the grinchy city of Germantown, TN, over its unconstitutional rules about holiday decorations.
2/ Officials in Germantown claimed Alexis’s holiday skeletons were really Halloween decorations and therefore violated the town’s restrictions on when and how residents can display their holiday decorations.
3/ Who gets to decide which decorations are for which holiday? The First Amendment gives us one clear answer: not the government.
Everyone has the right to their own holiday decor. As The Nightmare Before Christmas established, skeletons can get into the Christmas spirit.
Criticizing Israeli government policy can now get you punished at Harvard. Today, Harvard adopted an expansive version of the viewpoint-discriminatory IHRA definition of anti-Semitism — one that appears to make belief in Zionism a protected status.
2/ FIRE has noted the threat the IHRA definition poses to core political speech since 2015. Groups across the political spectrum — from @ADFLegal to the @ACLU — agree. thefire.org/news/groups-ac…
3/ Today’s settlement resolves two lawsuits against Harvard that accused the university of failing to address anti-Semitism in the wake of the Israel/Hamas war. reuters.com/world/us/harva…
BREAKING: FIRE will defend J. Ann Selzer, the veteran pollster whose last poll before the 2024 election incorrectly predicted Kamala Harris leading in Iowa, against a baseless lawsuit by President-elect Donald Trump that threatens Americans’ First Amendment rights.
2/ Trump’s lawsuit claims Selzer’s poll constitutes “consumer fraud.” That is not what those words mean. Consumer fraud laws are about the scam artist who rolls back the odometer on a used car, not a newspaper pollster whose prediction of an election winner doesn’t pan out.
3/ Selzer used the same methodology as when she previously called the state for Trump in 2016 and 2020, but this time she got it wrong. After Election Day, she released the full results of her telephone survey along with the weighting system used to interpret the data.
ANTHONY COMSTOCK is one of America’s WORST free speech villains, thanks to his weaponization of America’s moral panic in the late 1800s to punish his ideological opponents with prison time and hard labor.
You might not know about Comstock’s reign of terror, but you should 🧵
2/ Comstock first lobbied to create the “Comstock Act,” nicknamed for its father and enforcer, in 1873. Created to stop the spread of vice, the Comstock Act allowed the moral crusader to silence freethinkers, “pornographers,” and pretty much anyone he disagreed with.
3/ The Comstock Act employed broad bans on “immoral,” “lewd,” or “indecent” writings circulating through the mail. You might think those words are vague enough to include just about anything. And you’d be right!