FIRE Profile picture
Aug 13 13 tweets 5 min read Read on X
WOODROW WILSON may be America’s WORST-EVER president on free speech.

As president, Wilson weaponized fear of spies during WWI to silence critics, arrest suffragists, and even weaponize the postal service. 🧵Image
2/ Although Wilson was hardly a stout defender of the First Amendment in his first term, it wasn’t until the USA entered WORLD WAR I in 1917 that his censorship program began.Image
3/ Wilson began with the Espionage Act banning false information “harmful” to the US war effort and restricting what could be sent through the mail. He effectively weaponized the postal service against his adversaries destroying the distribution channels for 70+ publications.Image
4/ What started out as a noble goal (protecting the US in wartime) still had disastrous consequences for speech. The message was clear: don’t talk. One year into the war, Wilson announced the Sedition Act which escalated the speech restrictions to dire levels.Image
5/ The Sedition Act Banned:
👉🏻 advocating for labor strikes
👉🏻 supporting countries at war with the US
👉🏻 incitement to “insubordination” in military
👉🏻 “disloyal, profane, scurrilous, or abusive language about the government the Constitution, the military or the flag” Image
6/ Ironically, this ban on disloyal speech on the Constitution violated the very principles Wilson was attempting to defend, which raises the question, “What mattered more the Constitution or silencing Wilson’s critics?”Image
7/ The Espionage and Sedition Acts led to 2000+ prosecutions and about 1000 convictions, not to mention a massive violation of American’s free speech rights. As this image points out, even Jesus would have found himself on the wrong side of these rules! Image
8/ Some of those were arrested for protesting Wilson himself! The Women’s Suffrage Movement had long criticized Wilson for his reluctance to champion their voting rights. Image
9/ But in 1919, the tension escalated. The suffragists were fed up with Wilson’s refusal to advocate on their behalf, so they protested outside the White House, burning an effigy of Wilson (a straw-stuffed Wilson doll) to show their anger.Image
10/ “We burn not the effigy of the President of a free people, but the leader of an autocratic party organization,” said one woman. Wilson’s counteraction against the protestors only confirmed this statement.Image
11/ The police arrested dozens of women for making “violent speeches.” But last time we checked, speech isn’t violence. Wilson used force to silence his opposition.Image
12/ And this wasn’t the first time. Suffragists were arrested during a multi-year protest outside the White House. After those imprisoned started a hunger strike, they were even force-fed, as this poster demonstrates.Image
13/ These abuses of government power make Wilson an abominable president for free speech.

The good news is speech triumphed over censorship, the Sedition Act and parts of the Espionage Act were repealed, and the suffragists got the last laugh with the passing of the 19th Amendment in 1920. And the rest is history!Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with FIRE

FIRE Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @TheFIREorg

Aug 8
“There’s no guarantee to free speech on misinformation or hate speech and especially around our democracy.”

Yes, there is. It’s called the First Amendment.

You might’ve heard the words “misinformation” and “disinformation” thrown around by political figures from the left, right, and center.

This viral clip from 2023 features Governor Tim Walz, the Democratic candidate for Vice President, talking about misinformation.

But sadly, calls to censor “misinformation” and “disinformation” are bipartisan these days.

But the answer isn’t censorship — it’s more speech.

In a liberal democracy, there’s only one solution to the problems of “misinformation” and “disinformation”: judging the truth for ourselves.

An informed citizenry that can separate fact from fiction without the heavy hand of government regulation is what separates democracy from dictatorship.

Because the alternative is to trust the government to decide the truth for us.

And FIRE data shows Americans don’t want that.

The third installment of FIRE’s National Speech Index found that roughly six out of ten Democrats, Republicans, and independents do not trust the government “at all” to decide what speech is hateful or false.

Each day, the American people face the all-important task of perpetuating self-government through reflection, debate, and choice.

Free speech is the most effective tool we have at our disposal to inform ourselves.

If the government obtains the power to suppress protected speech as “hateful” or “misinformation,” make no mistake: that power will be abused.

Nobody — not Democrats, not Republicans, and not independents — will be safe from censorship.

As we’ve said before, free speech makes free people.

The freer the speech, the freer the people.
Curious to see how America’s free speech sentiments shift over time?

Explore FIRE’s National Speech Index for new quarterly data, breaking down how and why 69% of Americans think we’re on the wrong track when it comes to free speech. thefire.org/news/survey-sh…
Still have questions about what is "misinformation" and how it differs from "disinformation"? FIRE’s @mharwood31 breaks down the important distinction.
thefire.org/research-learn…
Read 4 tweets
Aug 6
Free speech hero DEMOSTHENES fought an epic battle against conquering king Philip II of Macedon.

Demosthenes used his voice; Philip the sword.

Despite personal danger, The orator spent his life reminding Athens of its duty to defend democracy in the face of tyranny. 🧵Image
2/ By 384 BC when Demosthenes was born, the Greek city-state of Athens was no longer in its prime. The Athenians lacked confidence after crushing military defeats first by the Persians and then by the Spartans. The city’s distinctive democracy had even disappeared for a time.Image
3/ Then another existential threat rose against Athens: KING PHILIP II OF MACEDON. Philip was a gifted general and strategist who revolutionized the Greek phalanx or soldier formation so that his spears could reach his opponents before the enemy’s spears presented a threat.Image
Read 16 tweets
Jul 1
BREAKING: Should the government have the power to dictate the opinions you see on social media?

If you said “hell no,” then we’ve got good news: The Supreme Court agrees.Image
2/ This morning, the Court rejected the idea that the government can force social media companies to host certain speech on their platforms, even if they don’t want to.

That’s a big win for free speech and a free internet.

supremecourt.gov/opinions/23pdf…
3/ Today’s opinion makes clear there’s no social media exception to the First Amendment.

The government can’t dictate what posts must be seen on X or Facebook any more than it can dictate what op-eds run in The New York Times or the Wall Street Journal.
Read 8 tweets
May 30
This morning, the Supreme Court unanimously reaffirmed a foundational First Amendment principle: “A government official cannot coerce a private party to punish or suppress disfavored speech on her behalf.”

The Court held the @NRA plausibly alleged New York state officials violated the First Amendment by coercing financial institutions to abandon the group to punish it for its advocacy.

The Court’s decision is a resounding win for the First Amendment.Image
2/ “The coercive tactics used by New York officials were a naked attempt to evade the Constitution,” said Robert Corn-Revere, FIRE’s chief counsel.“The Supreme Court’s unanimous decision sends a clear message that the government cannot use its bully pulpit to censor speech it doesn’t like without violating the First Amendment. Today’s decision is a major victory for free expression and the rule of law.”
3/ FIRE filed two friend-of-the-court briefs with the Supreme Court in support of the NRA’s First Amendment rights: Last April, we asked the Court to hear the case, and this January, we urged it to reach exactly today’s result.
thefire.org/cases/nra-v-vu…
Read 5 tweets
May 28
BREAKING: In a major win for free speech and academic freedom, @Harvard announced it will no longer make “official statements of empathy” about policy issues.Image
2/ As the full report from the faculty-led “Institutional Voice” working group says, “The purpose of the university is to pursue truth. In that pursuit, the university as an institution can never be neutral, because we believe in the value of seeking truth through open inquiry, debate, and weighing the evidence, as opposed to mere assertion or unjustified belief. . . .

The university and its leaders should not, however, issue official statements about public matters that do not directly affect the university’s core function.”Image
Image
Image
3/ FIRE strongly agrees. Last year, we endorsed institutional neutrality, which preserves colleges and universities’ ability to defend the rights of all students and faculty without apology or qualification.
Read 4 tweets
May 14
The University of Texas at San Antonio reportedly banned student protestors from:

• Using the words ‘Zionism’ and ‘Israel’;

• Chanting "From the river to the sea;"

• Speaking in Arabic.

It's unconstitutional censorship, plain and simple.

FIRE wrote @UTSA to demand that it reassure students that the First Amendment protects these words, phrases, and languages.

A public university should jump at the chance to show its commitment to the First Amendment, but UTSA ignored us.

So we wrote them again.Image
Image
2/ UTSA appeared on FIRE’s radar after reports indicated an administrator directed pro-Palestinian protestors to avoid using terms officials deemed “antisemitic hate speech,” apparently in an attempt to abide by Gov. Greg Abbott’s March 27 Executive Order.
3/ The gov’s EO directs Texas state universities to provide evidence they’re addressing anti-Semitism on campus. It specifically mentions certain phrases — like “From the river to the sea” — that the UTSA administrator later cited as examples of “antisemitic hate speech.”
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(