Scouts and trainers look out for these children, born in rural areas of developing countries, who have papers that say female but who have male bodies.
4) We know female boxers and coaches complained.
According to the International Boxing Association there were complaints about both boxers.
Rafa Lozano, former Olympic boxer and the Technical Commissioner of the Spanish boxing team said that at a training camp in Spain, Khelif caused injuries to every woman. marca.com/radio/2024/08/…
Mexican Brianda Tamara Cruz boxed Khelif at the Golden Belt Series Finals in Guadalajara in 2022. She said "I was hurt a lot by [the] punches, I think I had never in my 13 years as a boxer felt like this, not even in my sparring with men." elespanol.com/deportes/juego…
Joana Nwamerue who sparred with Khelif in Bulgaria said she recognised "male power" but was told by members of the Algerian National Team that Khelif was a woman who had "been biologically altered by living in the mountains" reduxx.info/khelif-is-a-ma…
5) We know that the two boxers underwent a sex test in May 2022 in Istanbul and failed.
6) University biology professor George Cazorla says that Khelif's manager contacted him in late 2022 and asked him to help prepare Khelif for competition.
7) We know that in March 2023 Khelif and Lu Ting were disqualified by the IBA from the women's world championships in New Delhi after failing the sex test again. reuters.com/lifestyle/spor…
We know what the lab results from the new Delhi lab said.
A karyotype means an individual’s complete set of chromosomes. Females have XX chromosomes, males XY.
The lab results for each athlete depict the XY chromosomes photographically.
8) We know that both Khelif and Lin were informed about their exclusion from the Championships for not meeting the IBA eligibility criteria. The athletes received a copy of their testing and were informed about the possibility of appealing to the CAS within 21 days.
9) We know that Lu Ting did not challenge this to the CAS, and that Khelif started a challenge and then dropped it.
10) We know that Cazorla got independent tests done by an endocrinologist from the Parisian University Hospital confirmed "a problem w her hormones, her chromosomes"
11) Cazorla said that Khelif was put on drugs to reduce testosterone to "within the female norm." archive.ph/Nrnw0#selectio…
The IBA say Khelif provided a number of medical documents, which were examined by the IBA Medical Committee.
But ultimately the IBA's criteria were no XY males.
12) We know the IBA wrote to the @iocmedia about the test results in June 2023
13) We know the IOC received the letter but said they couldn't look at it because GDPR
14) But in any case the IOC says that passport sex is what counts in boxing, despite knowing that males with 5-ARD (as well as transgender males) can have a passport that says "F".
The IOC's rules allow males to compete in women's boxing.
This is not fair and not safe.
It is *possible* to argue (as @nike do about Semenya) that boxers with "F" on their passport but XY chromosomes & testes producing T should have the right to compete as women.
This appears to be the position of @hrw @ILGAWORLD @Sport_Rights @amnesty hrw.org/news/2024/08/0…
But what it is not possible to do is to avoid that this is what you are arguing:
"The right to punch" women in the face with the force of a male body.
It's not "misinformation"
I think this is unforgivable.
With thanks to @ReduxxMag @oliverbrown_tel and @alanabrahamson for reporting the news and @FondOfBeetles @Scienceofsport @runthinkwrite for science explanations.
Yu Ting (sp!)
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I have seen quite a lot of this question going around.
Its called the "transman gotcha" and it is addressed in the Supreme Court judgment.
It goes like this: If you exclude "trans women" from women's spaces then you must include burly, bearded "trans men"
The answer in the judgment is that the Equality Act exceptions mean that both sex discrimination and gender reassignment discrimination prohibitions are disapplied so a service provider can lawfully exclude both ways.
There will be much talk of the single-sex exceptions in the Equality Act over the next few days.
These are the exceptions that allow service providers to offer services that are only open to one sex or the other (found at Schedule 3 Part 7 of the Act). (1/7)
Without these provisions service providers would be committing sex discrimination by excluding men or women.
Service providers don’t need to “use these exceptions” to exclude people, they just provide the service in the normal way. If they were to get sued they (or a lawyer) can point to the exceptions to show the service is lawful. (2/7)
The exceptions disapply both the prohibitions against sex discrimination and gender reassignment discrimination.
Again service providers don’t have to “use the exceptions” to exclude someone based on a particular protected characteristic. (3/7)
The CEO of @AdvanceHE has written to university vice chancellors acknowledging that "certain policy statements" cited in the @officestudents decision on @SussexUni "originated in part from" their template.
The parts in yellow came word-for-word from the Equality Challenge Unit/ Advance HE template....
i.e. almost all of it.
... this policy was influential and contributed to the culture of declaring everything "transphobia" and of hounding and not protecting those accused of it.
The ONS have new guidance out on their gender identity data from the census....
They say that you can take it from them with "high confidence" that around 1 in 200 people have a "gender identity different from their sex at birth" 🤨
So who is "Mr X" the trans identifying man held in high security male prison after multiple convictions for luring boys into sex acts while pretending to be a teenage girl on social media?
Could it be former children’s holiday camp manager Cameron Osman who engaged more than 70 teenage boys in sexualised chat pretending to be a 16-year-old girl “Lizzie lemon”.