In the United States, federal law ensures that U.S. military forces are not to be used as part of domestic law enforcement.
But an old law—the Insurrection Act of 1807—allows the President of the United States…
1/
to remove that bar and order National Guard or active-duty military to quell unrest, “domestic violence” or “conspiracy” that he deems a domestic rebellion or insurrection.
The Act’s language is so open-ended (“bafflingly broad,” according to the @BrennanCenter ), it gives
2/
the President “almost limitless discretion” to determine what meets the Act’s standards.
And an old Supreme Court decision ruled that it is “exclusively” the President’s decision to make.
No surprise, experts like @RepRaskin call for the Insurrection Act to be reformed.
3/
Here’s the problem: it is well documented that in his first term, Donald Trump pressed to invoke the Insurrection Act in wake of the Black Lives Matters protests in June 2020.
That’s when he infamously asked military leaders: “Can’t you just shoot them?…
4/
…Just shoot them in the legs or something?”
He even had an order drafted to that effect.
Even worse, it is equally well documented that Trump associates are “drafting plans to potentially invoke the Insurrection Act on his first day in office to allow him to deploy…
5/
the military against civil demonstrations.”
On the campaign trail, Trump himself suggests he would “unilaterally send troops into Democratic-run cities.”
And his goal (and that of Project 2025) is to politicize the upper echelons of the military so next time he demands..
6/
to invoke the Insurrection Act, no one will stop him.
Folks, this is deadly serious stuff.
And we should take it seriously.
Because the prospect of a fully armed US military policing American cities under Trump’s direction is dangerous as hell.
7/
2025, “Chapter 9,” imagines the scene of a second-term President Trump fulfilling his and his allies’ desire to use the US military to crack down on protests in American cities.
And as we enter the new school year, and the end of the first full year of universal vouchers in Ohio, the numbers continue to explode (as they are in other states).
1/
As @clevelanddotcom wrote Tuesday, the total cost of private school vouchers for the last school year (through August 7) ended up being….
And no surprise, the big jump in spending came from the newest voucher “program”—the one that eliminated all restrictions on who’s eligible to receive those vouchers:
“Enrollment in EdChoice-Expansion ballooned last school year…”
3/
They are on the ropes. Trump. Vance. America's far right.
Losing momentum. Running from their core beliefs. Panicking. Trying to change the subject.
Don't. Let. Them.
1/
So in my latest installment in exposing their plans, I explain how they will destroy America's public education if they are given the opportunity.
What they are planning to do is deeply unpopular across the country.
Which, again, is why they don't want to talk about it.
2/
What's their plan for education?
Basically, it's to double down on their reckless right-wing policies that are already tanking outcomes and destroying public education in state after state.
Here's the plan:
1) they will divert huge chunks of the federal education
3/
The nightmare of universal vouchers is already playing out across the country, siphoning away billions to private schools while dramatically underfunding public education.
1/
Project 2025 doubles down on all of it, converting precious federal funds that lift communities and kids in need into even more private vouchers.
Throw in censorship, Trump's promise to end vaccinations and the elimination of wide-ranging support services in public schools
2/
and what you get is a true meltdown of education across the board.
Chapter 8 of "2025" shows how this will play out for schools and families trying to educate kids.
A 🧵 on the embarrassment that is the Ohio Supreme Court (GOP majority)
Just when you thought it couldn’t get worse for the GOP majority of the Ohio Supreme Court, they got fact-checked….by the dictionary!
1/
Remember, the Court (the appointed and unqualified Justice Deters writing for the four GOP members) wrote that no reasonable person could conclude that the word “boneless” could mean without bones, and in doing so, denied a man a jury trial
2/
for near-death injuries he suffered from a chicken bone that punctured his windpipe.
Because in Ohio, everyday Ohioans lose to the big interests--even if it means you have to distort the obvious meaning of the clearest of words.