Scoop in @politico: @SenBlumenthal & @GrahamBlog told @ZelenskyyUa they'll push for another Ukraine supplemental this year, as well as to lift U.S. weapons restrictions on Ukrainian strikes into Russia.
Thoughts on why now is the right time and why a new supp is necessary🧵
First, the timing:
People forget what the purpose of the last supp was—the @WhiteHouse originally asked in August for an aid package that would last through 2023. After McCarthy's ouster, it then asked for a supp to last through 2024 to insulate Ukraine from the U.S. elections.
The military assistance in the April supplemental package is largely long-term contracts for production here in the U.S. It replenished the immediate military assistance pot (Presidential Drawdown Authority) by only $7.8 billion. This will last maybe to early 2025.
While European allies are codifying long-term military assistance to Ukraine, the U.S. is still only giving Ukraine enough to plan ahead by ~9 months at a time.
It's time to change that, and codifying the U.S.-Ukraine bilateral security agreement in Congress could fix that.
We saw how bleak things got when U.S. aid was blocked by Republicans afraid of losing their seats. Russia was in its best position since the start of the invasion.
Now, thanks to allied support, Ukraine is proving in Kursk that this war isn't a stalemate and wins are possible.
I'm optimistic a new supp won't face the same challenges as last time. Republicans saw they won't pay a real political price for supporting Ukraine. The "Putin caucus" is disempowered & nowadays @SpeakerJohnson sounds more like @LeaderMcConnell on Ukraine.
There's a key reason for this: as of a few weeks ago, every single Republican member of Congress who voted for Ukraine aid in April won their primary election. Phony arguments that they put "Ukraine first, America last" fell flat with voters.
A new supp can ensure Ukraine can plan for next year to capitalize on successes like the Kursk offensive. But Congress has to match our allies and pass meaningful long-term assistance.
We can't keep debating whether to help Ukraine every year. Let's decide to help Ukraine win.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Head of the Presidential Office of Ukraine @AndriyYermak invokes America’s Founding Fathers, past presidents, and the dark parallels to the rise of Nazism in a direct appeal to Congress to pass aid to Ukraine. A few key quotes 🧵thehill.com/opinion/intern…
“Today, Ukraine hoists democracy’s torch and reflects on the words of John Adams: ‘Liberty must at all hazards be supported. We have a right to it, derived from our maker.’”
“On the cusp of war in 1938, Britain and France negotiated a deal with Nazi and fascist regimes to stop Hitler from waging war. Far from pacifying Hitler, they gave him room to plunge the world into the greatest war the world had ever seen.”
Sources confirm that Trump is directly trying to tank Ukraine/border negotiations to deny Biden a political win and keep immigration as a campaign issue this year.
There's a few ways this might go. Few are good for Ukraine, and above all, precious time has been wasted. 🧵
Despite McConnell's comments, not all Republicans are on board.
"Somebody who is trying to defeat legislation, all in the name of running for office? That is irresponsible," @BillCassidy told @USATODAY. usatoday.com/story/news/pol…
🚨The @guardian has learned a major anti-Ukraine conference will be held in Washington, DC tomorrow.
@Heritage Foundation will bring together Hungarian President Viktor Orbán’s team & Republican congressmen to strategize how to end US support for Ukraine. theguardian.com/us-news/2023/d…
A diplomatic source close to the Hungarian embassy told the @guardian: “Orbán is confident that the Ukraine aid will not pass in Congress. That is why he is trying to block assistance from the EU as well.”
@guardian Ukraine aid was blocked in the Senate last week. That sent a dangerous signal to Putin and other strongmen like Orbán and Xi that our divisions can be exploited to harm Ukraine and weaken America.
Orbán is trying exactly that, tomorrow in Washington and this week with the EU.
We're still getting more details about today's strike against a Russian military airfield at Novofedorivka in occupied Crimea, but a few big implications are already clear.
Chief among them: The West has spent months investing in Ukraine—now we're starting to see the payoff.🧵
A defining feature of this war is how quickly and smartly Ukraine's employed sophisticated weapons systems from a West that hasn't always been eager to provide them.
Each time UA got something, it used it effectively and showed that more and better weapons wouldn't go to waste.
The latest example of this is HIMARS. The West was supremely reluctant to provide multiple launch rocket systems, but after pressure, finally provided them.
By all accounts, the system has been a game-changer.