Claire's Trans Talks Profile picture
Aug 16 25 tweets 10 min read Read on X
I promised you a parting gift - so here it is.

Ive been seriously data gathering around adult GICs across the UK for the last year, all obtained under FOI.

I have 5 years of comparative data, pre covid, 18/19 to 22/23.

Link at end of thread.

Buckle up.

1/?
In it you will find data around referrals, waiting lists, staffing, budget, and lots of other stuff.

Ive focussed on GICs as at this point the pilot schemes were not tendered as live services.

This is for the whole of the UK.

Lets dive in

2/?
Referrals :

Have effectively been flatlined for the last 5 years, with the main increase due to the new Welsh gender service

Referrals increased by about 14% in 5 years, but in numbers this is 120 per month, nationally.

Wales accounted for an average of 71 of this 120.

3/?
Image
Image
Waiting Lists:

Waiting Lists however have increased hugely, by 144% in the last 5 years, adding almost 21,000 people to a GIC waiting list, which sat at around 35,000 people as of 31 March 2023.

Only Notts / EoE GIC shows a significant decrease in waiting lists.

4/?
Image
Image
Referrals Vs Waiting Lists :

The picture becomes more stark when you compare the two.

Nationally, referrals have increased year on year by an average 4.5%, while waiting lists have increased by over 25% as a year on year average.

6/? Image
Heres the breakdown by country.

As we can see, Wales is basically static, all others have increased hugely.

7/?


Image
Image
Image
Image
Initial Assessments (IAs) :

Across the UK, the number of initial assessments being offered by clinics has increased by 18%, or only 65 per month.

Referrals are double that figure.

Only Wales has increased the number of initial assessments, every other country has declined

8/? Image
Its even worse when you look at individual clinics.

Almost every clinic are offering less IAs than they were compared to 5 years ago.

Take special note of London GIC, we will come back to that in particular later.

9/? Image
Total Appointments (TAs) :

This basically mirrors IAs, but we also have to remember this includes IAs.

Overall, TAs have increased by only 10%, or 365pcm nationally.

10/?
Image
Image
What if we exclude IAs?

The national trend doesnt change much, but theres a clear difference at clinic level, where its clear some clinics have shifted focus from IAs.

One response to an FOI suggested that this was at the direct instruction of the UK Gov via the DHSC.

11/?
Image
Image
Treatment Duration :

Only some clinics in England were able to provide this data, because they discharge service users to fend for themselves. Others were not because service users are never discharged, so remain under GIC care due in part to transphobic GPs.

12/?
Heres the graphs.

Overall, treatment durations increased by 71%, or 611 days.

Treatment Duration was 2.3 years in 18/19. By 22/23 it is over 4 years.

Only Notts / EoE GIC reduced treatment duration.

13/?
Image
Image
2nd Appt Duration :

Again, not all clinics held this data, but again its clear. there has been a substantial induced delay between IAs and 2nd Appts, which has increased by 81%, or 144 days from about 6 months to 11 months over the last 5 years.

14/?
Image
Image
Budgets :

Lets talk money.

Overall, budgets have increased nationally by 133%, or an average of 25% year on year, over the last 5 years.

Thats around £12.3 million, to over £21M.

Most of this has occurred in England, remembering we are *just* looking at GIC budgets.

15?/ Image
Wheres the money going?

Well, its not on admin staff, which explains why GIC admin in notoriously crap.

And while all clinics have invested in clinical staff, some have done so more than others.

16/?
Image
Image
How was the money distributed?

Again, note the London GIC, which got a staggering £2.2M extra.

The London GIC budget (£6.7M in 22/23) accounts for about 40% of the entire GIC budget of England, but is one of the worst performing services.

17/? Image
Clinical Staff :

Heres where it starts to get *really* interesting.

Nationally, clinical staffing increased by 81% over the last 5 years, by an extra 75 people (full time equivalent).

18/? Image
So why are they delivering so few appointments?

Because most GICs are not investing in staff capable of delivering diagnostic assessments.

London GIC have only increased diagnostic capacity by 0.2 FTE (one fifth of a person) in 5 years, from 9.8 to 10 diagnostic staff.

19/? Image
Clinician Workload :

Lets look at workload by diagnostic clinician. How many initial assessments do they do per month?

Not very many, and *significantly* less than they did 5 years ago, almost across the board.

Most clinicians are not even doing 1 IA a day.

20/? Image
What about all appointments?

basically the same.

A serious question has to be asked of most GICs in 'What the hell are staff doing all day, playing Minesweeper?'

Because they sure as hell arent working, and Im sure theyll have tons of excuses.

21/? Image
So, what have we learned from this data?

The NHS has this data available, but has never bothered to collect it, let alone analyse it, despite knowing gender services have been in crisis for a least 8 years.

Nor have LGBT & Trans Orgs.

If I can do it, why havent they?

22/?
The data exposes every lie GICs tell about 'unprecedented rises in referrals', 'huge volumes of patients', 'no budget' and 'no staff' to excuse growing waiting lists.

In my option theres probably a number of factors at play, with low rates of clinician processing at No 1

23/?
What causes that? your guess is as good as mine, but based on both experience and talking to others, Id put most of my money on clinicians being both lazy and punch drunk on power, coupled with a service spec and diagnostic process that is over complex.

24/?
But what is clear is that

1) Clinicians simply arent doing their jobs.
2) GICs are catastrophically failing as a service model
3) Both the NHS and Gov are lying about 1 & 2.

The Welsh model seems to offer a way forwards, but even that appears to be stalling.

25/?
Anyway - thats not the end of it.

My real gift to you all is the data, available here :



Im also waiting on data for the last year to come in, and Ill make that available when its all come in.

26/ Enddocs.google.com/spreadsheets/d…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Claire's Trans Talks

Claire's Trans Talks Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CTransTalks

Apr 25
My response to the @EHRC following their unsolicited letter last night.

Dear Baroness Falkner

I thank you for your completely unsolicited letter of 24th April 2024.

I am indeed fully aware of your upcoming special review by the UN Sub Committee for Accreditation, as well

1/?
as the events that have led the EHRC to this point.

I note that you include a number of supposed 'achievements' that are anything but. To address some of your points, although I strongly suspect you will not agree with my positions :

2/
The Cass Review will be viewed in time to be one of the worst and most flagrant examples of scientific fraud designed to meet an ideological and political agenda. It does nothing to help transgender children in any capacity, but instead serves as a vehicle to erase the

3/
Read 20 tweets
Mar 14
The laundry list of unethical behaviour at @thecassreview gets longer.

Thanks to some outstanding research from @FierceMum, we now know that the NICE review on PBs later used by Cass was also chaired by Cass - a major conflict of interest.

This is on top of...

1/
Excluding trans people from the governance process, but including conversion therapy advocates, having known anti-trans bigots deciding what research is valid, Cass herself following multiple anti-trans groups prior to the review, the SI which effectively tried to out every

2/
Trans person with a GRC to the research team, and the deeply unethical and coercive research programme on PBs.

And thats just off the top of my head.

The whole thing has been a stitch up from the start.

3/
Read 4 tweets
Mar 3
Found something rather interesting today in regards to the 'investigation' into the EHRC Chair (Kishwer Falkner) and her bully of staff & transphobic comments.

🧵

In short it seems to reveal that Badenoch is indeed running the EHRC as a puppet organisation,

1/
in direct contravention to the UNs requirement under the Paris Principles to be independent from Government.

We all know that Badenoch is anti-trans, and has stocked the EHRC to the gills with anti-trans commissioners.

2/
You may remember that the investigation into Falkner was started in May 2023 after claims of bullying and transphobic comments. This was demanded by the UN.



3/chamberuk.com/chair-of-ehrc-…
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(