FaithIntellect Profile picture
Aug 17 24 tweets 6 min read Read on X
THREAD 🧵 Refuting the Lies of @SagasofBharat

@SagasofBharat you lying Piece of Human Garbage you literally lied about the verse without providing any proof. Her claim that Quran 5:32, where it states “if anyone kills a person unjustly, it is as if he has killed all of
Image
humanity,” is only for the Children of Israel is completely unfounded. Scholars affirm that this verse is a universal commandment for all Muslims to follow. Tafsir of these verses shows that this principle applies to every soul, not just to Image
a specific group. For example, in the Tafsir, it explains that saving life means avoiding unjust killing, and this act saves the lives of all people from harm. Scholars emphasize that the message of this verse is intended for the broader Muslim community and humanity at large,
rejecting the claim that it is limited to the Children of Israel. In another Tafsir, it is stated, “Whoever kills one soul that Allah has forbidden killing is just like he who kills all mankind.” Sa’id bin Jubayr explains that “He who allows himself to shed the blood of a Image
Muslim is like he who allows shedding the blood of all people. He who forbids shedding the blood of one Muslim is like he who forbids shedding the blood of all people.” Additionally, Ibn Jurayj reports that Al-A’raj and Mujahid commented on the verse, saying,
“He who kills a believing soul intentionally, Allah makes Hell his abode, and his punishment will be equivalent to if he had killed all people.” This interpretation further solidifies that the verse applies universally to all Muslims and emphasizes the seriousness of unjust
Killing.” In the Tafsir, there is a clear warning to those who commit mischief and exceed limits. Allah says, “(And indeed, there came to them Our Messengers with Al-Bayyinat),” meaning that despite clear evidences, signs, and proofs, many continued in disobedience. Image
The Tafsir criticizes those who commit prohibitions even after knowing they are forbidden. The Jews of Al-Madinah—Banu Qurayzah, An-Nadir, and Qaynuqa’—are specifically mentioned for their hypocrisy in fighting alongside Khazraj or Aws during Jahiliyyah and later ransoming
captives and paying blood money. This behavior is condemned by Allah in Surat Al-Baqarah for violating divine laws despite understanding them.
In another Tafsir, it is stated, “Whoever kills one person, merits punishment as if he had slain all the men in the world.” This clearly indicates that the verse refers to the entire human race. The Tafsir further explains, “The survival of human life depends on everyone Image
respecting other human beings and contributing actively to the survival and protection of others. Whoever kills unrighteously is guilty not only of wronging one person but shows by his act that his heart lacks respect for human life and sympathy for humanity as a whole.
Such a person is an enemy of all mankind because, if this mindset became widespread, it would lead to the destruction of the entire human race.” Conversely, preserving even one life is seen as protecting all of humanity.
This interpretation clearly demonstrates that the verse is a universal command, extending beyond the Children of Israel.
Now her claim about Quran 5:33 she deliberately Didn’t include the Context of the verse because she knows she’s lying. This verse refers to those who commit heinous acts like murder, armed robbery, or attempting to destabilize an Islamic state through violence and rebellion. Image
The Tafsir of this verse clarifies that the phrase “Allah is Oft-Forgiving, Most Merciful” was revealed in relation to the idolators. It explains that the verse decrees that if one among the idolators repents before being apprehended, there is no right to punish them. Image
However, this does not apply to Muslims who commit murder, cause mischief in the land, or wage war against Allah and His Messenger and then defect to the disbelievers before being caught by the Muslims. Such individuals remain liable for punishment for the crimes they committed.
Abu Dawud and An-Nasa’i reported that Ikrimah said that Ibn Abbas made this clarification regarding the verse.
This video explains that Quran 5:33 refers to people who force Muslims to worship false gods or prevent them from worshiping Allah. The verse speaks about individuals who hinder the spread of Allah’s message, which is: “There is only one God who is beyond comprehension,
and we will be accountable for our deeds on the Day of Judgment.” Muslims are obligated to spread this message peacefully. The part of the verse that discusses cutting off limbs or crucifying the corrupters is directed at those who commit severe crimes such as as murder, rape,
and armed robbery or who will be exiled from their land. The video emphasizes that no verse in the Holy Quran permits Muslims to kill non-Muslims unless it is in self-defense on the battlefield or to avoid an attack. Verses 5:32 and 5:33 indicate that even Muslims who kill non-
Muslims unjustly are subject to the death penalty. Furthermore, the Hadith in Volume 9, Book 93, Number 473, narrated by Jarir bin ‘Abdullah, states: “Allah’s Apostle said, ‘Allah will not be merciful to those who are not merciful to mankind.’” Image
This reinforces the importance of mercy and justice toward all of humanity.

Islam is a religion of peace, mercy, and justice, with teachings that emphasize the value of all human life. The Quran and Hadith promote compassion, fairness, and respect for others.
Do not listen to those who misinterpret or distort its teachings for their own agendas. Always seek accurate knowledge from authentic sources.
@threadreaderapp Unroll

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with FaithIntellect

FaithIntellect Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IslamicIns70668

Aug 15
THREAD 🧵 Debunking Ancestral Vril’s Lies @AncestralVril

I’ll be debunking the lies spread by Ancestral Vril and exposing the truth behind his misinformation. The claim by Ancestral Vril that Islam allows pedophilia is absolutely false, and no credible Islamic scholar or
orientalist would support such an accusation. His assertion that Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) raped Aisha at 9 is entirely baseless, with no evidence to support it. The two Hadiths he cited—Sahih Al-Bukhari 5133 and Sunan An-Nasa’i 3379—mention nothing about rape. Image
It simply says what age Aisha was when the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) married her. Ancestral Vril’s objection to Aisha’s age is baseless, as her marriage to Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him) was normal for 7th-century Arabia.
Image
Image
Read 26 tweets
Aug 11
THREAD 🧵 The Early Church did not Believe in the trinity Response to @InspiringPhilos

The Trinity was not taught by the earliest Christians, nor is it explicitly found in the Bible. InspiringPhilosophy’s claim that the Trinity was an original Christian belief is misleading and
ignores historical evidence showing that this doctrine developed centuries later. Bart Ehrman, a renowned New Testament scholar, has stated that the doctrine of the Trinity is illogical and was not taught by the earliest Christians.
He argues that the concept of the Trinity developed over 300 years after the time of Jesus and was not part of the original Christian teachings. This perspective challenges the idea that the Trinity is a fundamental, ancient Christian belief.
Read 19 tweets
Aug 5
THREAD 🧵 Understanding Prophet Muhammad’s Marriage to Aisha in Historical Context.

Prophet Muhammad’s marriage to Aisha bint Abu Bakr, which historical records suggest was contracted when she was six years old and consummated when she was nine, is often scrutinized through the Image
lens of modern societal norms. However, to fully understand this marriage, it is crucial to consider the cultural, social, and historical context of 7th century Arabia.
Historical and Cultural Context:

In 7th century Arabia, as in many ancient and medieval societies, marriage practices were significantly different from contemporary standards. Marriages were often arranged based on familial alliances, tribal affiliations, and social
Read 25 tweets
Jun 8
THREAD 🧵 Debunking ISIS: Exposing the Un-Islamic Nature and Universal Condemnation by Muslim Scholars.

ISIS claims to represent Islam, but the reality is far from their twisted narrative. Join me as I expose the truth about ISIS and highlight the united condemnation Image
from Muslim scholars worldwide.

Many Islamic scholars label ISIS as Khawarij, an early extremist sect known for their violent and rebellious interpretations of Islam. In this video lecture, Sheikh Ibn Othaymeen explains how ISIS embodies the traits of the Khawarij, who are
notorious for declaring other Muslims as unbelievers and justifying violence against them. He highlights their extremism in religion, misinterpretation of texts, and rebellion against legitimate authority, all of which starkly contrast with true Islamic teachings.
Read 21 tweets
May 19
THREAD 🧵 Debunking lies about The Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him)

It’s amazing how fake Ex Muslims try getting popular by spreading Misinformation about Islam so in this thread I’ll be Debunking Infidel Noodle and her arguments against Islam.
Her First Argument Against our Prophet is that he kept Slaves.

Slavery was practiced throughout history until the Twentieth century. It is not something introduced by Islām. Islamic Slavery was not race based Slavery Muslims never mistreated any of their slaves.
Image
Image
John locke, the founding father of secularism, says Slavery doesnʼt exist in the Bible because you werenʼt allowed to kill them.

By this definition, Islām didnʼt even had any concept of slavery. Islām treated them unlike anyone else.
Image
Image
Read 22 tweets
Apr 28
THREAD 🧵 Debunking Sagasofbharat Claims about Devadasi with proper evidence and evidence from Hindu Scriptures.

Deva means god, Dasi means female slave, Devadasi means slave to god. Where according to ancient Hindu practices, young pre-pubescent girls are married off and given
Away. The devadasi practice is one in which low-caste girls, who have not yet reached puberty and who may even be as young as four or five years old, are married' or dedicated' to a Hindu goddess. The practice requires the girl to become sexually available for community members Image
leading to these children being sexually exploited by temple patrons and higher caste individuals From these temples the devadasis are meant to sexually satisfy the priests, zamindars (landlords) or higher caste patrons because "for her service to them is akin to service to God"
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(