People need to stop overreacting about Kamala’s plan to reduce food inflation, as if it would lead to communism, mass starvation, and the end of America.
I worked in M&A in the food industry. Here’s a step-by-step summary of what would actually happen:
1. The government announces that grocery retailers aren’t allowed to raise prices.
2. Grocery stores, which operate on 1-2% net margins, can’t survive if their suppliers raise prices. So the government announces that food producers (Kraft Heinz, ConAgra, Tyson, Hormel, et. al.) also aren’t allowed to raise prices.
3. Not all grocery stores are created equal. Stores in lower-income areas make less money than those in higher-income areas, as the former disproportionately sell lower-margin prepackaged foods (“center of the store”) instead of higher-margin fresh products like meat (“perimeter of the store”). Because stores in lower-income areas aren’t able to cover overhead (remember, even if their wholesale costs are fixed, their labor, utilities, insurance, and other operating expenses aren’t fixed… yet), grocery chains start to shut them down. Food deserts in rural areas and in low-income urban areas alike become worse.
4. Meanwhile, margins for food producers are also quickly eroding. Their primary costs (ingredients, energy, and labor) aren’t fixed, and their shrinking gross profits leave less cash flow available to cover overhead, maintain facilities, and reinvest in additional production capacity.
5. Grocery chains, which have finite shelf space, start to repurpose their stores (those they didn’t have to shut down, I should say) to sell more non-price-controlled items—everything from nutrition supplements to kitchenware to apparel—and less price-controlled food products. Your local Kroger or Safeway starts to look and feel more like a Walmart.
6. Food producers stop making products with lower margins. Grocery chain start competing with each other to secure inventory. Since they can’t compete by offering stronger prices (remember, producers aren’t allowed to raise prices here, and, even if they could, grocery chains no longer have the gross profit to bear price increases), they compete on things like payment terms.
7. Small grocery chains start to shut down entirely, or get sold to larger chains like Kroger. In addition to not being able to cover fixed costs, a major reason for this is because they can no longer reliably secure delivery of products, due to producers prioritizing sales to larger customers, which are able to leverage their stronger balance sheets to offer superior payment terms.
8. Smaller food producers—which typically sell via distributors, rather than directly to grocery chains—start to go out of business. Because these producers have an additional step their value chains, and because they have lower volumes over which to spread their fixed costs, their cost structure is inherently disadvantaged compared to major food producers. When grocery stores aren’t able to raise prices, cutting product costs becomes all the more important, and deprioritizing purchases from smaller producers is an easy way to do so.
9. As supply chains break down, lines start to form outside grocery stores every morning. Cities assign police officers to patrol store parking lots, and food producers draft contingency plans to assign armed escorts to delivery trucks.
10. The federal government announces a program to issue block grants for states to purchase and operate shuttered grocery stores. The USDA also seizes closed-down production facilities.
11. The government announces that prices for all key food costs—corn, wheat, cattle, energy, etc.—are also now fixed, to stop “profiteers” from gouging the now-government-operated food industry.
12. Shockingly, the government struggles to operate one of the most complex industries on the planet. The entire food supply chain starts imploding.
13. Communism, mass starvation, and the end of America quickly ensue.
Hey wait a second
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
By now, we all know about the new tariffs on imports from Canada and Mexico. But what does this actually mean for businesses and consumers?
I just downloaded and analyzed a bunch of Trade Department data to find out.
Let’s dig in! 👇
Every year, the US runs a trade deficit with both Canada and Mexico. In simple terms, we import from them more than we export to them.
In 2023, Canada sent us $419B of goods (blue), while we sent them $354B (green). This resulted in a $64B deficit (yellow).
Similarly, the US also runs a persistent trade deficit with Mexico. Mexico’s import numbers aren’t much larger than Canada’s, but, because we export less to them, our trade deficit is larger—$152B in 2023.
I downloaded five years of H-1B data from the US DOL website (4M+ records) and spent the day crunching data.
I went into this with an open mind, but, to be honest, I'm now *extremely* skeptical of how this program works.
Here's what I found 👇
Before I start, one note: All charts in this thread are for applications that were “certified” (in other words, approved for entry into the H-1B lottery). I filtered out applications the gov rejected.
All numbers here are therefore for visas employers actually and realistically attempted to obtain.
To start with, this program is MASSIVELY popular with employers. The program has a statutory limit of 85,000 visas per year, but employers routinely receive approval for more than 800k applications per year (868k, or 10x the limit, in 2024).
My wife is in the middle of a Mexican standoff in the church nursery.
Our two year old got mad and threw a cup of animal crackers on the floor.
My wife refuses to leave until she picks them up. My daughter refuses to clean up until we promise her a cake pop and Bluey at home.
My wife (former Marine) is the most stubborn mom on the planet. My daughter (personality of an ISIS prison guard) will happily scream for hours on end.
I just dropped off a peppermint mocha for my wife. She’s digging in and playing the long game. Our pastor offered to broker a truce, but he left when the toddler hurled an elephant cookie at him, grumbling that our denomination doesn’t pay well enough to deal with situations like this (which is totally fair).
Will keep everyone apprised. If there are any hostage negotiators here with experience defusing toddler meltdowns, please reach out.
Update: My daughter is now demanding the removal of all US troops and naval vessels from the Middle East. This is really escalating out of hand.
The Economist published a brutal takedown of the woke movement this week.
tldr: Wokeism isn’t dead yet, but it’s suffering a significant (and much needed) statistical decline.
Let’s dive into the numbers 👇
Contrary to what many believe, 2020/2021 represented the *peak* of wokeism, not the genesis.
The woke movement gained much of its momentum in 2015, with—you guessed it—the announcement of Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
This peak is evident across public opinion, the media, and higher education alike.
The business world was slower to adopt wokeism, only doing so after the death of George Floyd. But it also now jettisoning it (yes, DEI really was a ZIRP phenomenon).
Don’t get an MBA. You don’t need to spend $200k to learn how to be a business leader or an entrepreneur.
You can get a better business education for $8 per month on Twitter, and in way less time than two years.
From finance to marketing to business law, here’s who to follow! 👇
BUSINESS ETHICS
Business is the voluntary exchange of goods and services. And the foundation of this is ethical behavior.
If you want to learn how to do business the right way, there’s no better teacher than @moseskagan. He’s brilliant, wise, and just a thoroughly decent guy.
MARKETING
Believe it or not, products don’t sell themselves. If you want your business to make it, you need to get in front of potential customers.
@Camp4 is a world-class CMO. Follow him for regular master classes on building a high-performance marketing team for your company.