BREAKING: Jack Smith has filed a superseding indictment in Trump’s J6 case. Same charges, I’m assuming he deleted elements SCOTUS rules were immune from prosecution 
It appears Smith removed @JeffClarkUS as a co conspirator.
SCOTUS determined Trump’s interactions with his own DOJ clearly represented “official acts” and protected by presidential immunity
Where does Jeff Clark go to get his reputation back?
SCOTUS determined Trump’s interactions with his own DOJ clearly represented “official acts” and protected by presidential immunity
Where does Jeff Clark go to get his reputation back?
@JeffClarkUS Jack Smith also had to present his case to a new grand jury in DC. SCOTUS further ruled immunized conduct could not be used during any phase of the investigation/prosecution including GJ proceedings.
Of course it’s a layup getting an indictment against a Republican in DC.
Of course it’s a layup getting an indictment against a Republican in DC.
Smith did remove the DOJ allegations from 1st indictment.
New one on left, old on right.
New one on left, old on right.
What jumps out at me in the new indictment is the language for 1512c2 does not comport with SCOTUS opinion on Fischer. Smith does not appear to address the document/evidence impairment requirement held by SCOTUS.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
