VLS Enjoyer Profile picture
Aug 31, 2024 22 tweets 8 min read Read on X
A Thread on The Troubled Development of the Sapsan Ballistic Missile, Ukraine’s ATACMS. 1/19 Image
I see a lot of people being confused when referring to this system, switching between Hirm, Grom-2 or Sapsan, hopefully this thread will clarify the situation. 2/19 Image
Back in 2006 the National Security and Defence Concil of Ukraine looked for a system to replace the ageing Totchka-U ballistic missile with its 120km range. Design of that system was given to the Pivdenne Design Bureau known for their work on Soviet ICMBs and rockets. 3/19 Image
The project was called Sapsan, peregrine falcon. Development was supposed to take 10 years with a prototype planned for 2010. A testing ground was supposed to be built at Zheleznyy Port. By 2008, 25 million Hryvnas had been spent with 2 billion more needed for a 2015 IOC. 4/19 Image
However, with the 2008 financial crisis work was stopped before being terminated in 2013, citing a mismanagement of resources by Pivdenne. 5/19 Image
Since 2011 an off-shoot of the Sapsan project was being offered for export, the Hirm-2, also referred to as Grom. In 2013, Pivdenne received funding from an unknown customer to fund the project. 6/19 Image
As we now know that Saudi Arabia sent 40 million dollars to the Pavlograd Chemical Plant for the development of the missile’s solid fuel engine, it is more than likely that unknown customer. 7/19 Image
With the 2014 Russian annexation of Crimea priorities shifted and Pivdenne proposed to the Defence Ministry to restart work on Sapsan with the experience they gained on Hirm-2. The target was for trials to start by 2018. 8/19 Image
Petro Poroshenko greenlit the project and the AM Makarov Machine Building Plant was designated as the missile’s manufacturer. By 2018 engine testing began, with 12 engines produced by September 2019. 9/19 Image
In April 2019 two prototyped had been assembled, one for Saudi Arabia and one for Ukraine. In 2021 Ukraine agreed to fund a first test battery with 2 TELs, 2 mobile loaders and 2 control units. 10/19 Image
On August 27th 2024 president Zhelensky declared a first successful test of a domestically produced ballistic missile. 11/19

I don’t have much to say on the design of the Sapsan itself since actual pictures of the current system are behind a wall of OpSec. Aerodynamically it will be similar to the ATACMS and Iskander with a set of four small tail control surfaces. 12/19 Image
The Sapsan boast a range estimated to reach 500+km, more than the 280km of the Hirm-2 limited by the Missile Technology Control Regime (MTCR). This would allow Ukraine to strike deep inside Russian territory independently. 13/19 Image
The Sapsan would also threaten S-300PM1/2/3 and S-400 not optimized against ballistic threats as the poor performances against ATACMS have highlighted. Other systems such as the S-300Vs and S-500 would be able to intercept it more easily, however. 14/19

To guide its 480kg warhead precisely to its target the system uses Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) coupled with Inertial Navigation system (INS). Ukrainan officials mentioned terminal target acquisition capabilities, but details are unclear. 15/19 Image
That be could an active radar or an electro-optical seeker as is used on optional warheads for the 9M720 Iskander. Such a system would greatly enhance the Circular Error Probability (CEP) of the system but is more challenging to manufacture. 16/19 Image
Batteries are mounted on 10x10 trucks from the Kharkiv Transport Machinery Plant for the TELs, loader and engagement modules. 17/19 Image
Rumors and declarations by Ukrainian officials have pointed to potential uses in attacks on the military airfield in Saki on August 9, 2022, and Feodosia on April 8, 2023, but with no defenitive photographic evidence. 18/19 Image
Still, it seems that development is being prioritized to compensate for the firing restrictions imposed by some partner nations. Hopefully production will ramp up and we could be expecting some spectacular fireworks by next year if trials are conclusive. 19/19 Image
@FRHoffmann1 @ukraine_map @AntoniWalkowski @Iron_Man_Actual @shashj @CovertCabal @MassiasThanos @Firezstarter1 @heatloss1986 @krakek1 @DLT649 @KentLavis @KentLavis @Doha104p3 @VLO225 @John_A_Ridge @ChungTzuW @phoenix_jz @ThrustWR @AirPowerNEW1 @Decis_ @softminus @StrategicTrends @JaredGuP1
Typo: Hrim not Hirm

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with VLS Enjoyer

VLS Enjoyer Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VLS_Appreciator

Mar 3
🧵 Thread on France's Ramjet Powered Air-Launched Nuke That May Protect Europe🇪🇺: The ASMPA-R. 1/22 Image
Historically France's deterrence relied on the classic triad of Sea (SLBM), Ground (SRBM/IRBM) and Air with the AN-11 and AN-22, analogous to the US' B61/83. 2/22 Image
However, rapid development of SAM technology in the 70s threatened the use of gravity bombs, prompting the French Air Force to look for a stand-off alternative. 3/22 Image
Read 23 tweets
Dec 10, 2024
The Dragon Eye: Thread On Chinese Destroyers’ Type 346 AESA Radar. 1/17 Image
Being the most important sensor on China’s first rank destroyers, equivalent to the US Navy’s SPY-1/6s, understanding the “Dragon Eye” is critical to correctly evaluate the capabilities of the Chinese navy. 2/17 Image
The development story of the Type 346 is unique in how much we know thanks to the wealth of information shared in 2016 online by one of its key architects who emigrated to North America. It must still be taken cautiously but seems very likely credible information. 3/17 Image
Read 19 tweets
Nov 26, 2024
Drones and the Future of Warfare: Remembering the Lessons of the Jeune Ecole.

A Thread to better understand the issues surrounding the idea that drones are changing warfare, using the lessons learnt from the French Jeune Ecole. 1/15 Image
Since the War in Ukraine of 2022, and to some extend the Nagorno-Karabakh War of 2020, there has been prolific debates on how drones from the TB-2 to the FPV are changing warfare, making expensive legacy systems like tanks, jets or air-defense now obsolete. 2/15 Image
These debates mirror the raging debates that took the French navy by storm in the end of the 19th century. Looking back at these debates gives us the benefit of hindsight and allows us not to repeat the same mistakes again. 3/15 Image
Read 17 tweets
Nov 22, 2024
Thread on the S-300P / S-400 Family: Part 5 Transporter Erector Launchers.

With its many iterations over the decades, the S-300P saw equally as many different TELs designs. From towed, self-propelled and connected ones, this thread will review the main evolutions. 1/11 Image
A first overall comment is that S-300P TELs differ significantly from previous Soviet TELs with fully enclosed missile cannisters and cold-launched ejection. The disposition allowed for easier missiles handling, maintenance and 360° launch capability. 2/11 Image
The initial TEL was the 5P851, a stop gap measure just like the system it equipped with, the S-300PT. Towed by a KrAZ-258 tractor, the trailer launcher can be deployed on an unprepared ground area with a slope of no more than 4º in the horizontal plane. 3/11 Image
Read 12 tweets
Nov 19, 2024
Thread on the S-300P / S-400 Family: Part 4 Target Engagement Radar. 1/14 Image
As we saw in the previous part, in the S-300P systems threats are detected by the long-range radars transferring the tracking data to lower level dedicated engagement radar at the battery level. 2/14 Image
These radars use PESA arrays to combine in a single platform target tracking, missile tracking, and depending on missile command types, sending information to guide the missile to its target. TThese radars usually use narrower band waves, typically X band or adjacent. 3/14 Image
Read 15 tweets
Nov 18, 2024
Thread on the S-300P / S-400 Family: Part 3 Long Range Radars. 1/16 Image
Like older Soviet SAMs using the P-12/14/15/18s, the S-300P uses dedicated long range early detection radars. Due to their high price (command post + RLO was roughly the price of a full battery), they were only at the brigade/regiment level directing 2-6 batteries. 2/16 Image
To reach long ranges these radars use larger band waves, making them unable to direct tracking and threat engagement. The central command post relays relevant information down to the dedicated individual engagement radars at the battery level to perform the engagement. 3/16 Image
Read 17 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(