Heatloss Profile picture
Sep 1, 2024 47 tweets 19 min read Read on X
The RIM-8J was the last of the Talos missiles, and by far the best. With a range of up to 130nmi and a 465 pound warhead, the last model of Unified Talos could claim to be amongst the most lethal surface-to-air missiles of the Cold War, thanks in part to its Fire control System🧵 Image
This thread will skip over the development side and skip straight to the juicy technical bits of the last Talos variant and shipborne radars. For a highly recommended overview including other variants, check out @VLS_Appreciator 's thread on the topic.
Engaging a target with Talos began long before the missile left the ship. It first began with detecting a target with the ship's air search radars.

An operator in the Combat Information Center would then designate a target for attack if it failed IFF and was deemed hostile. Image
This information would be sent to the Weapons Control Room to be displayed on the main Designation Indicator Monitors.
An officer at the Designator Console would select the highest priority target, which would transfer information to the Target Engagement Console.
Image
Image
The Target Engagement Console operator would then designate an SPG-49 operator team to track the target.
These radars were responsible for generating a track solution on the target, as no precise information on the target had yet been gathered. Image
The SPG-49 Fire Control Radar actually consisted of two main feed systems with an illuminator.
The first radar feed provided the Acquisition Console Operator with a 3-dimensional view of the target zone(acquisition field) through his dual displays.
Image
Image
This allowed him to identify the correct target as he slewed the radar through the target area.
The Tracking Console Operator would then identify the target based on the bearing shown on his search radar display and the exact target range along the radar beam on his tracking display. Once the target was selected, automatic track would through the second radar feed.
So how did SPG-49 work?
To begin, we should start with the acquisition scan. To provide enough rapidly updating, hyper-accurate data to allow target discrimination at over 150nmi, an unusual radar design was required. This began at the Foster scanner. Image
Foster scanners should be considered black magic, but they work by simple physics. A very narrow parabolic slot reflector is the source of the radiation. If a differential fold in the path is added, the time spent traversing the longer path changes the direction of the beam. Image
The parabolic reflector is set at a fixed angle with regards to the rest of the system. A cone with a constantly spinning rotor inside of it changes the path length constantly, but it does so at different rates for each end of the cone, since one end is larger than the other.
Image
Image
The end result of this is that the direction of the emitted beam changes constantly from one side to the other at an extremely high rate, and once it finishes one scan, it snaps back to the beginning of its pattern. The output of the foster scanner was horizontally polarized.
But this only took care of one dimension of scan. The other was taken care of by the vertically polarized reflector, seen in the middle of this diagram. This provided another extremely rapid method of scanning, meaning that the acquisition displays updated nearly continuously. Image
Once the target was selected and identified by the Tracking Console, the pulse transmitter feed would be switched from the foster scanner to the tracking horn, a vertically polarized monopulse tracker capable of 0.25 milliradian(0.014 degrees!) accuracy.
Image
Image
Since monopulse is relevant for both the tracker and RIM-8J, this is worth covering now. A monopulse radar is an angular tracking method that works by having four main receiver quadrants, A, B, C, and D. In the case of SPG-49, this works by phase comparison. Image
The outputs of A+B and C+D are combined, with one flipped 180 degrees out of phase. The same is done for A+D and B+C. This means that, if the target is in the exact center of the four quadrants, the output of all of these equations is zero. Thus, the error is zero.
However, if a target is slightly off of the center, there is a slight difference in the phase of the return signals. When run through the signal comparisons explained above, this generates an error. The chart below explains how error signals are interpreted.
Image
Image
These error signals were automatically processed by the fire control computer to change the physical direction of the antenna to constantly point directly at the target.
The final output of this tracking system is the sum of A+B+C+D. The delay between the transmitted pulse and the reception of the output of this sum is directly proportional to the range to the target. To increase range accuracy, a method called pulse compression was utilized.
Pulse compression, in this case, was done by frequency modulation. By constantly varying the frequency of the transmitted pulse in a linear fashion, a much longer pulse containing multiple returns can be split into much smaller returns in the time domain.
Image
Image
This gave SPG-49 a staggering range accuracy of 300 feet in both acquisition and track modes!
Once a target track was achieved, the range, bearing and elevation were transmitted to the fire control computer. The first thing this computer would do is determine the necessary flight trajectory to intercept the target. Image
While the computer was determining the correct solution, the Talos missiles which had been loaded onto the launchers began spooling up their internal gyroscopes and batteries in preparation for flight. Image
Once they were ready, the missile could be launched!
Once the missile was in the air, the first part of guidance could begin. This was controlled by a separate radar, the SPW-2. The purpose of this radar was to provide beam-riding guidance commands for the Talos during boost and cruise phases and track the missile's position.
Image
Image
The SPW-2 emitted 3 coded pulses at a varying interval. These pulses were coded to identify the SPW-2, preventing the Talos from receiving guidance from the wrong radar. These pulses were sent out at a varying rate as the beam rotated in a cone around an axis. Image
The scan rate of 30 hz was processed by the missile's electronics to produce a reference frequency. If the missile was centered, the signal amplitude would be constant. If it was not, the amplitude modulated signal would be shifted in phase away from the reference signal.


Image
Image
Image
Image
The phase shift would indicate the direction of the error, and the amplitude would indicate the magnitude of the error. The SPW-2 would guide the Talos through its flight path until it came time to activate the onboard seeker.
So what about that flight? The RIM-8J achieved its impressive 130nmi range through the use of a ramjet, which necessitated the booster for launch. After it got up to speed, it ignited the ramjet which blew the booster away.


Image
Image
Image
Image
One of the changes in RIM-8J was the move to a more energetic fuel that increased the missile's range. This was called "Dimer fuel." JP-5 was used in older models, but Dimer significantly increased the effective range of Talos. Image
During this flight, the Fire Control Computer began measuring the difference in speed between the launching ship and the target. This version of Talos used semi-active radar guidance in the terminal phase, and it guided on the relative doppler shift of the target. Image
The advantage of this method of guidance is that the target speed would almost always be separated from ground clutter, and therefore the missile could track a target flying very low against the ocean. Image
Now, remember the part of the SPG-49 diagram that said "CW illuminator"? That's where this comes in. The CW illuminator was fed through the Foster scanner locked in the boresight position, meaning it aligned perfectly with the pulsed emissions of the monopulse tracking horn. Image
The estimated target doppler sent from the ship was called the GAA signal, and when fed into the rear reference receiver, would provide a narrow window of frequencies that could be processed by the front receiver.

This made doppler-based jamming extremely difficult.

Image
Image
Image
So how did the homing system work without a radar dish? Interferometers. The four spikes around the front of the Talos missile were each a radar receiver. These were paired together diagonally to detect differences in signal phase for elevation and azimuth. (Homing Antenna) Image
These differences, when measured, would give an azimuth/elevation error signal. When Az/El were combined, a two-dimensional effective scan angle could be measured. Image
In older versions of Talos, the azimuth and elevation angles were measured sequentially, but this was vulnerable to angle-jamming and had to be changed. In RIM-8J, the original CW seeker was replaced with a new Monopulse CW seeker. Image
The new monopulse seeker processed each antenna output simultaneously and combined them to create a phase shift signal after some basic signal processing, further reducing the possibility of effective jamming.

ωₛ was the phase difference signal for each pair of antennae. Image
This guidance method, combined with a Home on Jam mode was, in practice, unjammable. In fact, the HOJ mode INCREASED the accuracy of RIM-8J, as it provided a very clear point-source rather than the complicated radar return of an Aircraft's aluminum skin.


Image
Image
Image
Image
At the same time as the seeker was activated, 15 seconds before impact, the fuze was too. This was connected, of course, to the warhead, the final part of Talos we're going to cover today.
This was as a colossal 465-pound Continuous Rod warhead, containing 225 pounds of 25/75 Cyclotol, a 25% RDX and 75% TNT mixture. The expanding ring had a maximum expansion diameter of 90 feet and an initial velocity of 4,600 feet per second.
Image
Image
Continuous Rod warheads have their downsides, but they can also provide immense amounts of damage to a target if accurate fuzing is provided.
Image
Image
In the case of Talos, this accuracy was provided by an active fuzing system.
This used a pulse radar with a "sea tracking gate", which constantly monitored returns from the sea if the missile had to intercept at low altitude to prevent returns from the sea activating the warhead.

Image
Image
Image
Although I cannot find any photos or videos of a test with a live conventional warhead, I think one can assume the outcome.
Unfortunately, the service life of RIM-8J would be short. Though it was only introduced in 1971, it was removed from service in 1979.
Standard Missile-ER (SM-2) would replace it as the fleet's long-range SAM. Although effective, it didn't have quite the "cool factor" of Talos. Image
As requested @Lantirn40K @actualjib @TomcatJunkie @SpockNC @NotLuca81087036 @Thatdude2531 @m43day @ond144 @VLO225 @taiwaneseprick @RokkerBoyy @peck_oh @steeljawscribe @KiranPfitzner @whatismoo @VLS_Appreciator @Doha104p3 @BaA43A3aHY @StrokeNdistance @EricWelch42 @coldfoot666
special thanks goes out to the crew at Okieboat. There are a few diagrams and systems explanations that only they have on their website, and were crucial in the making of this thread.okieboat.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Heatloss

Heatloss Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @heatloss1986

Nov 25, 2025
Someone asked me to do a comparison of capabilities between F-35A and JAS-39E Gripen. A ton of material is classified but I will do my best here.
In short, Gripen is not even in the same class as F-35A. It isn't awful, but it is not a competitor with F-35. Image
Image
Let's start with one of the greatest advantages of the Gripen: its electronic warfare systems. The Gripen has a relatively robust signal receiver network across the aircraft, with several antennas capable of electronic attack, such as the wingtip pods and external jammers. Image
Image
Image
Image
The Gripen's wingtip pods provide an uncommon capability called "crosseye jamming." Crosseye jamming can create a positional false target in the horizontal or vertical plane, rather than just range. Image
Read 25 tweets
Jun 24, 2025
Optically guided missiles seem enticing until you realize the litany of problems with them. In this short thread, I'll explore a few.

The first and easiest counter is to fly at night. F-117 Nighthawk combat missions were flown at night, as was Midnight Hammer with B-2 over Iran. Image
Image
If you want to try to optically track a target with damn near zero contrast, be my guest.

The Japanese Navy found that at night the human eye struggled to pick up ships over about five miles. A ship on the horizon is a significantly bigger target than a B-2 or F-117.
For a computer, greater signal to noise ratios are required to effectively track a target. This is why imaging infrared is preferable to optical contrast. Shown below is the last few seconds of flight of an AIM-9X.
This uses imaging infrared to detect and track the target.
Read 11 tweets
May 27, 2025
Since the end of the Cold War in 1991, the US Navy's ability to conduct air superiority and offensive strikes has been slowly diminishing. Today, we stand at an inflection point, where the F/A-XX program to deliver a new strike fighter to the Navy is in Jeopardy.
🧵 Image
This thread is a pitch for a congressional write-in campaign. The first part is a history of the degradation of the Navy's air wing. The second part is an analysis of a recent oversight hearing. The last post of this thread contains instructions for emailing your representatives.
In the 1980s, the A-6F was proposed for development. This was to be an updated A-6E including modern avionics, new engines, and AMRAAM. This would have provided the Navy with a relatively low cost program, retaining a two-seat crew with a large payload and good mission systems. Image
Read 24 tweets
May 12, 2025
Some very interesting stuff going on here with the Shenyang aircraft. 🧵

Exhaust appears visually similar to the F-22's with 2D thrust vectoring and shrouding. Wing shaping is nothing particularly special but seems good. Like JH-36, it retains some conventional control surfaces.
The all moving wingtips are a novel solution. I don't know what the trade offs are but they must be at least somewhat worth it. Potentially these are considered lower risk, higher strength, or more effective than the semi-morphing control surfaces on the JH-36. Image
The intake design is interesting. Unlike JH-36, which uses caret intakes underneath and uses a DSI above, the Shenyang aircraft uses what appears to be two DSIs below. The gear appears to fold sideways into a bay ABOVE the side bays, giving it a J-20-esque four bay arrangement. Image
Read 6 tweets
Apr 20, 2025
With the renewed interest in the Europa wars, this may be the best time to bring up the unusual short ranged missile developed for space-superiority craft.

The AIM-95E "Europa Agile," the only missile designed for operation in deep space AND within thin atmospheres.🧵 Image
First off, I apologize in advance for the lack of photos on this topic. All existing photos of Agile are of the ones designed in the 1970s for operation within Earth's atmosphere. Therefore, you will have to imagine some of these changes to the system.
The Agile for aerial use was cancelled in the mid 1970s after about $50m was wasted developing several different airframes and seekers. This spelled the end for the program as most know it, but this would only be the starting point for the Europa Agile. Image
Read 16 tweets
Apr 16, 2025
For my entire life I have been taught about the importance of effective searches. Since May 2024, I have fought with an unwanted feature that has made my experience worse.

A rant about "AI Overview," AI assisted search and their impact on using Google as a tool for research.🧵 Image
Google has billed these features as "taking the legwork out of searching" and "able to answer complex questions." This is a bald faced lie.
The AI has wasted more time than it has saved me, lied about results, and forced me to learn methods to get around it rather than to use it. Image
Image
Image
I do a lot of research using keywords that I need matched exactly. For example, right now, I was looking up the specific thrust of the General Electric F414 engine used in the X-59, an experimental plane in development for NASA. This should be a simple question to answer. Image
Image
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(