Heatloss Profile picture
Sep 1 47 tweets 19 min read Read on X
The RIM-8J was the last of the Talos missiles, and by far the best. With a range of up to 130nmi and a 465 pound warhead, the last model of Unified Talos could claim to be amongst the most lethal surface-to-air missiles of the Cold War, thanks in part to its Fire control System🧵 Image
This thread will skip over the development side and skip straight to the juicy technical bits of the last Talos variant and shipborne radars. For a highly recommended overview including other variants, check out @VLS_Appreciator 's thread on the topic.
Engaging a target with Talos began long before the missile left the ship. It first began with detecting a target with the ship's air search radars.

An operator in the Combat Information Center would then designate a target for attack if it failed IFF and was deemed hostile. Image
This information would be sent to the Weapons Control Room to be displayed on the main Designation Indicator Monitors.
An officer at the Designator Console would select the highest priority target, which would transfer information to the Target Engagement Console.
Image
Image
The Target Engagement Console operator would then designate an SPG-49 operator team to track the target.
These radars were responsible for generating a track solution on the target, as no precise information on the target had yet been gathered. Image
The SPG-49 Fire Control Radar actually consisted of two main feed systems with an illuminator.
The first radar feed provided the Acquisition Console Operator with a 3-dimensional view of the target zone(acquisition field) through his dual displays.
Image
Image
This allowed him to identify the correct target as he slewed the radar through the target area.
The Tracking Console Operator would then identify the target based on the bearing shown on his search radar display and the exact target range along the radar beam on his tracking display. Once the target was selected, automatic track would through the second radar feed.
So how did SPG-49 work?
To begin, we should start with the acquisition scan. To provide enough rapidly updating, hyper-accurate data to allow target discrimination at over 150nmi, an unusual radar design was required. This began at the Foster scanner. Image
Foster scanners should be considered black magic, but they work by simple physics. A very narrow parabolic slot reflector is the source of the radiation. If a differential fold in the path is added, the time spent traversing the longer path changes the direction of the beam. Image
The parabolic reflector is set at a fixed angle with regards to the rest of the system. A cone with a constantly spinning rotor inside of it changes the path length constantly, but it does so at different rates for each end of the cone, since one end is larger than the other.
Image
Image
The end result of this is that the direction of the emitted beam changes constantly from one side to the other at an extremely high rate, and once it finishes one scan, it snaps back to the beginning of its pattern. The output of the foster scanner was horizontally polarized.
But this only took care of one dimension of scan. The other was taken care of by the vertically polarized reflector, seen in the middle of this diagram. This provided another extremely rapid method of scanning, meaning that the acquisition displays updated nearly continuously. Image
Once the target was selected and identified by the Tracking Console, the pulse transmitter feed would be switched from the foster scanner to the tracking horn, a vertically polarized monopulse tracker capable of 0.25 milliradian(0.014 degrees!) accuracy.
Image
Image
Since monopulse is relevant for both the tracker and RIM-8J, this is worth covering now. A monopulse radar is an angular tracking method that works by having four main receiver quadrants, A, B, C, and D. In the case of SPG-49, this works by phase comparison. Image
The outputs of A+B and C+D are combined, with one flipped 180 degrees out of phase. The same is done for A+D and B+C. This means that, if the target is in the exact center of the four quadrants, the output of all of these equations is zero. Thus, the error is zero.
However, if a target is slightly off of the center, there is a slight difference in the phase of the return signals. When run through the signal comparisons explained above, this generates an error. The chart below explains how error signals are interpreted.
Image
Image
These error signals were automatically processed by the fire control computer to change the physical direction of the antenna to constantly point directly at the target.
The final output of this tracking system is the sum of A+B+C+D. The delay between the transmitted pulse and the reception of the output of this sum is directly proportional to the range to the target. To increase range accuracy, a method called pulse compression was utilized.
Pulse compression, in this case, was done by frequency modulation. By constantly varying the frequency of the transmitted pulse in a linear fashion, a much longer pulse containing multiple returns can be split into much smaller returns in the time domain.
Image
Image
This gave SPG-49 a staggering range accuracy of 300 feet in both acquisition and track modes!
Once a target track was achieved, the range, bearing and elevation were transmitted to the fire control computer. The first thing this computer would do is determine the necessary flight trajectory to intercept the target. Image
While the computer was determining the correct solution, the Talos missiles which had been loaded onto the launchers began spooling up their internal gyroscopes and batteries in preparation for flight. Image
Once they were ready, the missile could be launched!
Once the missile was in the air, the first part of guidance could begin. This was controlled by a separate radar, the SPW-2. The purpose of this radar was to provide beam-riding guidance commands for the Talos during boost and cruise phases and track the missile's position.
Image
Image
The SPW-2 emitted 3 coded pulses at a varying interval. These pulses were coded to identify the SPW-2, preventing the Talos from receiving guidance from the wrong radar. These pulses were sent out at a varying rate as the beam rotated in a cone around an axis. Image
The scan rate of 30 hz was processed by the missile's electronics to produce a reference frequency. If the missile was centered, the signal amplitude would be constant. If it was not, the amplitude modulated signal would be shifted in phase away from the reference signal.


Image
Image
Image
Image
The phase shift would indicate the direction of the error, and the amplitude would indicate the magnitude of the error. The SPW-2 would guide the Talos through its flight path until it came time to activate the onboard seeker.
So what about that flight? The RIM-8J achieved its impressive 130nmi range through the use of a ramjet, which necessitated the booster for launch. After it got up to speed, it ignited the ramjet which blew the booster away.


Image
Image
Image
Image
One of the changes in RIM-8J was the move to a more energetic fuel that increased the missile's range. This was called "Dimer fuel." JP-5 was used in older models, but Dimer significantly increased the effective range of Talos. Image
During this flight, the Fire Control Computer began measuring the difference in speed between the launching ship and the target. This version of Talos used semi-active radar guidance in the terminal phase, and it guided on the relative doppler shift of the target. Image
The advantage of this method of guidance is that the target speed would almost always be separated from ground clutter, and therefore the missile could track a target flying very low against the ocean. Image
Now, remember the part of the SPG-49 diagram that said "CW illuminator"? That's where this comes in. The CW illuminator was fed through the Foster scanner locked in the boresight position, meaning it aligned perfectly with the pulsed emissions of the monopulse tracking horn. Image
The estimated target doppler sent from the ship was called the GAA signal, and when fed into the rear reference receiver, would provide a narrow window of frequencies that could be processed by the front receiver.

This made doppler-based jamming extremely difficult.

Image
Image
Image
So how did the homing system work without a radar dish? Interferometers. The four spikes around the front of the Talos missile were each a radar receiver. These were paired together diagonally to detect differences in signal phase for elevation and azimuth. (Homing Antenna) Image
These differences, when measured, would give an azimuth/elevation error signal. When Az/El were combined, a two-dimensional effective scan angle could be measured. Image
In older versions of Talos, the azimuth and elevation angles were measured sequentially, but this was vulnerable to angle-jamming and had to be changed. In RIM-8J, the original CW seeker was replaced with a new Monopulse CW seeker. Image
The new monopulse seeker processed each antenna output simultaneously and combined them to create a phase shift signal after some basic signal processing, further reducing the possibility of effective jamming.

ωₛ was the phase difference signal for each pair of antennae. Image
This guidance method, combined with a Home on Jam mode was, in practice, unjammable. In fact, the HOJ mode INCREASED the accuracy of RIM-8J, as it provided a very clear point-source rather than the complicated radar return of an Aircraft's aluminum skin.


Image
Image
Image
Image
At the same time as the seeker was activated, 15 seconds before impact, the fuze was too. This was connected, of course, to the warhead, the final part of Talos we're going to cover today.
This was as a colossal 465-pound Continuous Rod warhead, containing 225 pounds of 25/75 Cyclotol, a 25% RDX and 75% TNT mixture. The expanding ring had a maximum expansion diameter of 90 feet and an initial velocity of 4,600 feet per second.
Image
Image
Continuous Rod warheads have their downsides, but they can also provide immense amounts of damage to a target if accurate fuzing is provided.
Image
Image
In the case of Talos, this accuracy was provided by an active fuzing system.
This used a pulse radar with a "sea tracking gate", which constantly monitored returns from the sea if the missile had to intercept at low altitude to prevent returns from the sea activating the warhead.

Image
Image
Image
Although I cannot find any photos or videos of a test with a live conventional warhead, I think one can assume the outcome.
Unfortunately, the service life of RIM-8J would be short. Though it was only introduced in 1971, it was removed from service in 1979.
Standard Missile-ER (SM-2) would replace it as the fleet's long-range SAM. Although effective, it didn't have quite the "cool factor" of Talos. Image
As requested @Lantirn40K @actualjib @TomcatJunkie @SpockNC @NotLuca81087036 @Thatdude2531 @m43day @ond144 @VLO225 @taiwaneseprick @RokkerBoyy @peck_oh @steeljawscribe @KiranPfitzner @whatismoo @VLS_Appreciator @Doha104p3 @BaA43A3aHY @StrokeNdistance @EricWelch42 @coldfoot666
special thanks goes out to the crew at Okieboat. There are a few diagrams and systems explanations that only they have on their website, and were crucial in the making of this thread.okieboat.com

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Heatloss

Heatloss Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @heatloss1986

Aug 21
This is the same fallacy that many fall into: the cheaper unit that can be produced in greater quantity is better than the expensive unit.
In saving cost, you sacrifice on capability. At some point, the lost capability makes the unit so ineffective that the cost is irrelevant. 🧵
Here's an example: an AIM-9M in 1986 was ~179,000 in 2024 dollars. Using numbers from the same source, the AIM-9B in 1964 was ~30,000 in 2024 dollars.
The AIM-9B in Vietnam had a probability of kill (Pk) of ~15%. In the Gulf War, the AIM-9M had a Pk of ~55%!
Image
Image
Keep in mind this was not against the same targets.
Flares were extremely common in the Gulf war, and shots were taken from the front, side, and rear against maneuvering targets.
The advanced technology in the AIM-9M could handle these countermeasures with ease.
Read 11 tweets
Jul 6
Here's some semi-informed thoughts that I'd like to use to start a discussion more than "be right".

This indicates to me that AIM-260 JATM is going to not be focused solely on long range, and that there is a serious threat posed by a Chinese air-breathing weapon. Short 🧵
One of the major improvements that AMRAAM provided over Sparrow was an increase in F-pole range. This refers to the distance between the launching aircraft and the target when the missile impacts. This is increased by higher missile speed.
Higher F-pole=safer launching aircraft.
AIM-174 is a fantastic missile with great range, but the weight and cost likely make it non-viable as a fighter-to-fighter weapon for air superiority.
Its performance and weight lends itself better to bomber/strike aircraft/AEW&C/cruise missile interception, much like Phoenix.
Read 15 tweets
Jun 27
I'm sure by now most of you have seen this... contraption. And I know for a fact that there's been a lot of speculation as to what it was. Well, I've got answers. Mini🧵 Image
Right off the bat, the term "MRASM BKEP" needs to be deciphered a bit.
MRASM, or AGM-109, was a version of Tomahawk designed for launch by aircraft, thus the AGM designation. They shared significant components, so the -109 designation was retained. Image
AGM-109L was the true stubby tomahawk, but AGM-109H is where the minihawk of legend comes from. Image
Read 7 tweets
Jun 26
For a long time, I've derided the AIM-54 as being a poor anti-fighter missile. However, I've stumbled across some information that makes me reconsider what I've said. A short🧵 Image
While reading old congressional hearings, I found this passage. There are three major portions to this performance that I think are worth touching on. Increased energy, autopilot efficiency, and control efficiency and design. Image
The first should be pretty self-explanatory. The motor on Phoenix propels it to speeds higher than Sparrow could dream of, at ranges of over 100 nautical miles, about double the aerodynamic range of AIM-7F.
At short ranges, this means vastly increased available missile energy. Image
Read 10 tweets
Jun 16
The AIM-7E-2 "Dogfight Sparrow" is one of the least well-understood variants of the Sparrow, and yet one of the most important ones in the transition between the Sparrow as a bomber-hunter and the Sparrow as a dogfight missile. A short 🧵to explain the changes. Image
The first thing to get out of the way is the identification: the AIM-7E-2 is identical to the AIM-7E visually, except for black stripes on the forward wings. A common myth about the 7E-2 is that it incorporated "clipped wings", but this is wrong. (7E | 7E-2 pictured)
Image
Image
The biggest changes to the AIM-7E-2 were the decrease in the minimum range, from approximately 3,300 feet on the AIM-7E to 1,500 feet on the 7E-2 under ideal situations, and a significant increase in combat maneuverability.
Image
Image
Read 23 tweets
Jun 6
Finally, more information on Diamondback!
There are a few frames in here which display the seeker design. This is fascinating. A short thread to describe what's going on:🧵
In short, this is another fantastic design out of China Lake. This is a dual mode seeker, likely using the lower error or stronger of the two returns at a given point in time, which allows for long range guidance over radar and short range, more accurate guidance over IR. Image
The mesh used for the radar reflector would have to be very thin wire, so as not to disrupt the IR signal. However, mesh makes for a very good radar reflector material. The radar reflector was likely angled to create a conical scan, like that of AIM-9C.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(